Classroom management plans are created by teachers to assist in the planning and implementation of a positive classroom environment that is efficient, proactively addresses issu

Creating a Classroom Management Plan – Rubric

Statement of Purpose and Rules 9 points

Criteria Description

Statement of Purpose and Rules

5. Target 9 points

Classroom management plan statement of purpose is mindful and comprehensive. Realistic classroom rules,

positive reinforcements, and consequences are thoughtfully designed.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Classroom management plan statement of purpose is clear and reasonable. Relevant classroom rules, positive

reinforcements, and consequences are clearly presented.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Classroom management plan statement of purpose is vague. Description of classroom rules, positive

reinforcements, and consequences is provided, but missing key elements.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Classroom management plan statement of purpose is ineffective. Inadequate classroom rules, positive

reinforcements, and consequences are provided.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Procedures and Classroom Environment 9 points

Criteria Description

Collapse All

Procedures and Classroom Environment

5. Target 9 points

Classroom procedures and routines are realistically and thoughtfully designed. Classroom environmental

considerations are of high quality and ideal for meeting student needs.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Classroom procedures and routines are reasonably presented. Classroom environmental considerations are

mindful of student needs.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Classroom procedures and routines are marginal. Classroom environmental considerations are missing key

elements and not clearly mindful of student needs.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Classroom procedures and routines are illogically presented. Classroom environmental considerations are

inappropriate for student needs.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Implementation Plan 13.5 points

Criteria Description

Implementation Plan

5. Target 13.5 points

Implementation plan proficiently explains how classroom management plan will be introduced and how rules

and procedures will be taught to students and paraeducators.

4. Acceptable 11.75 points

Implementation plan soundly describes how classroom management plan will be introduced and how rules

and procedures will be taught to students and paraeducators.

3. Approaching 9.99 points

Implementation plan minimally describes how classroom management plan will be introduced and how rules

and procedures will be taught to students and paraeducators.

2. Insufficient 9.32 points

Implementation plan is unintelligible or describes ineffective methods for how classroom management plan

will be introduced and how rules and procedures will be taught to students and paraeducators.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Documentation Plan, Con�dentiality and Ethical Considerations Plan 9 points

Criteria Description

Documentation Plan, Confidentiality and Ethical Considerations Plan

5. Target 9 points

Documentation plan includes how to realistically and creatively document student behavior and the

effectiveness of the classroom management plan. Consideration of how to handle confidential documents,

protect student rights, and protect confidential information of individuals with disabilities is well-thought out

and professional.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Documentation plan includes how to appropriately document student behavior and the effectiveness of the

classroom management plan. Consideration of how to handle confidential documents, protect student rights,

and protect confidential information of individuals with disabilities is reasonable and clear.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Documentation plan simplistically addresses how to document student behavior and the effectiveness of the

classroom management plan. Consideration of how to handle confidential documents, protect student rights,

and protect confidential information of individuals with disabilities is cursory.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Documentation plan illogically addresses how to document student behavior and the effectiveness of the

classroom management plan. Consideration of how to handle confidential documents, protect student rights,

and protect confidential information of individuals with disabilities is inappropriate.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Crisis Management Plan 9 points

Criteria Description

Crisis Management Plan

5. Target 9 points

Crisis management plan skillfully describes steps to de-escalate behavior, addressing the safety of students

and staff with efficiency.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Crisis management plan soundly describes steps to de-escalate behavior, addressing the safety of students

and staff with accuracy.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Crisis management plan broadly describes steps to de-escalate behavior, addressing the safety of students

and staff.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Crisis management plan inaccurately describes steps to de-escalate behavior, addressing the safety of

students and staff.

1. No Submission 0 points

Substitute Teacher Plans 9 points

Criteria Description

Substitute Teacher Plans

5. Target 9 points

Substitute teacher plans skillfully describe information that would be left for a substitute teacher.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Substitute teacher plans soundly describe information that would be left for a substitute teacher.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Substitute teacher plans broadly describe information that would be left for a substitute teacher.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Substitute teacher plans inaccurately describe information that would be left for a substitute teacher.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Rationale 9 points

Criteria Description

Rationale

5. Target 9 points

Rationale comprehensively explains how the plan meets the needs of students in the Class Profile, proficiently

referencing the CEC Professional Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

Rationale clearly explains how the plan meets the needs of students in the Class Profile, soundly referencing

the CEC Professional Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

Rationale minimally describes how the plan meets the needs of students in the Class Profile, vaguely

referencing the CEC Professional Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Rationale unconvincingly describes how the plan meets the needs of students in the Class Profile, poorly

referencing the CEC Professional Ethical Principles and Professional Practice Standards.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Organization 9 points

Criteria Description

Organization

5. Target 9 points

The content is well-organized and logical. There is a sequential progression of ideas that relate to each other.

The content is presented as a cohesive unit and provides the audience with a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

The content is logically organized. The ideas presented relate to each other. The content provides the audience

with a clear sense of the main idea.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

The content may not be adequately organized even though it provides the audience with a sense of the main

idea.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

An attempt is made to organize the content, but the sequence is indiscernible. The ideas presented are

compartmentalized and may not relate to each other.

1. No Submission 0 points

Research Citations and Format 9 points

Criteria Description

Research Citations and Format

5. Target 9 points

All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.

4. Acceptable 7.83 points

All required aspects of APA format are correct within the submission.

3. Approaching 6.66 points

APA is attempted where required, but some aspects are missing or mistaken.

2. Insufficient 6.21 points

Many citations are missing where needed; or many of the sources are inappropriate for the submission; or APA

is attempted where required, but many aspects are missing or mistaken.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 4.5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Target 4.5 points

Submission is virtually free of mechanical errors. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and

content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging.

4. Acceptable 3.92 points

Submission includes some mechanical errors, but they do not hinder comprehension. A variety of effective

sentence structures are used, as well as some practice and content-related language.

3. Approaching 3.33 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or

word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

2. Insufficient 3.1 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice

or sentence construction is used.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Total 90 points