PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:

,

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

In 2–3 pages, address the following:

• Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected personality or paraphilic disorder.

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of the controversy within the field related to the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Explain your professional beliefs about your selected disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response includes a thorough and well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale demonstrates critical thinking and is strongly supported with three scholarly references. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response includes a well-organized explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is clear and appropriately supported with three scholarly references. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response includes a somewhat vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is somewhat unclear and references either provide weak support for the rationale or are not scholarly/current. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response includes a vague explanation of the student's professional beliefs about the disorder. Rationale is unclear and references are inappropriate. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Good 80%–89% 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response includes an accurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Fair 70%–79% 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response includes a vague or inaccurate explanation of strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a client that may present with the disorder. Or the response is missing. Feedback:

• Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) The response includes an accurate and concise explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Good 80%–89% 12 (12%) – 13 (13%) The response includes an accurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Fair 70%–79% 11 (11%) – 11 (11%) The response includes a somewhat vague or incomplete explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 10 (10%) The response includes a vague and inaccurate explanation of ethical and legal considerations related to the disorder that are important to clinical practice and why they are important. Or, response is missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

— Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1-2 APA format errors Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3-4 APA format errors Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains five or more APA format errors Feedback:

Name: NRNP_6675_Week7_Assignment_Rubric

,

Assignment: Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders

Between 10% and 20% of the population experience personality disorders. They are difficult to treat as individuals with personality disorders are less likely to seek help than individuals with other mental health disorders. Treatment can be challenging as they do not see their symptoms as painful to themselves or others.

Paraphilic disorders are far more common in men than in women, and generally quite chronic, lasting at least two years. Treatment of these disorders usually involves both psychotherapeutic and pharmacologic treatments.

In this Assignment, you will explore personality and paraphilic disorders in greater detail. You will research potentially controversial elements of the diagnosis and/or treatment and explain ethical and legal considerations when working with these disorders.

To Prepare

· Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on assessing, diagnosing, and treating personality and paraphilic disorders.

· Select a specific personality or paraphilic disorder from the DSM-5-TR to use for this Assignment.

· Use the Walden Library to investigate your chosen disorder further, including controversial aspects of the disorder, maintaining the therapeutic relationship, and ethical and legal considerations. 

·

The Assignment

In 2–3 pages:

· Explain the controversy that surrounds your selected disorder.

· Explain your professional beliefs about this disorder, supporting your rationale with at least three scholarly references from the literature.

· Explain strategies for maintaining the therapeutic relationship with a patient that may present with this disorder.

· Finally, explain ethical and legal considerations related to this disorder that you need to bring to your practice and why they are important.

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.