Assignment Deliverables – submit 2 files: Written Case (Word only) and Excel document (Excel only) Project Goal: Demonstrate your business analytics skills. Your first s
Assignment Deliverables – submit 2 files: Written Case (Word only) and Excel document (Excel only)
Project Goal: Demonstrate your business analytics skills.
Your first step for this project is to identify a data set appropriate for application of analytics from Kaggle that is amenable to Excel manipulation. The Data Set Assignment link provides more information (see other assignment link).
Here is the source for the data: https://www.kaggle.com/datasets?fileType=csv
The Project:
Apply as many analytics models and calculations (Chapters 1 – 16) as you can about your selected data, within the constraints provided. However, prioritize your insights and focus on what senior managers care about. This project is not a calculation dump — it is a thoughtful report that uses calculations to draw insights (descriptive, predictive, prescriptive) and make conclusions that is of use to management.
The report is to senior management and should detail the insights and conclusions you have drawn from your analysis. The report needs to be an analysis (judgement of good or bad) based on the model calculation outcomes. It is necessary, but not sufficient to state and or exhibit calculation results.
The Excel document needs to exhibit the calculations in a traceable, auditable and readable form. However, keep in mind the grading for the final project is almost exclusively (90%) based on the report and its quality (see rubric) and not the Excel document. That is, make the assumption the reader will not see the Excel document.
Summary: Pick a data set. Submit data set to Sakai. Then work the data, extensively applying analytics calculations (descriptive, predictive and prescriptive) and models using Excel, and write an interesting data driven 7 to 10 page report. The report should be professionally formatted (tables and graphs a must, 1-inch margins), paginated, title page, section headings, coherent paragraphs, show data and come to a conclusion. The page count does not include the cover page, reference page, tables and graphs.
Within the Excel submission provide another copy of the raw data (untouched) to the first worksheet (tab).
Submit the written report and the corresponding Excel document with the calculations See the rubric for how grades are assessed.
Format: Excel and Word
Reference link : https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/mysarahmadbhat/airline-passenger-satisfaction
Final Project OPRE 605 Grading Rubric Summer 2022
Inadequate – 1(0 – 50%) |
Average – 2 (75%) |
Good – 3 (85%) |
Excellent – 4 (95%) |
|
Introduction (15% or 45 points) |
Does not provide adequate background and or purpose for the report. |
Introductory information is adequate but clarity of objective needs development |
Introductory information is clear and professionally developed |
Introduction is excellent: it is clear, engaging, and thorough. As a reader, I know exactly what the report will provide |
Data Analysis, Calculations, and Results Addressing Executive Objectives (30% or 90 points) |
Data analysis not connected to purpose/objectives; presentation and interpretation of results are inaccurate. Insufficient application of concepts and calculations to address objectives identified by executive Zero score (0) if Excel missing |
Data analysis needs to be stronger but is adequate. Results of calculations stated, but not fully analyzed or interpreted. Favors statement of results rather than interpretation and analysis Calculations are somewhat sufficient to meet objectives – i.e. number of applied concepts and calculations |
Data analysis is appropriate and relevant; presentation and analysis of data is good. Favors interpretation and analysis rather than statement of results. Sufficient application of concepts and calculations to address objectives |
Data analysis is appropriate and relevant; presentation and analysis of data are professional, thorough, engaging, and sophisticated. Excellent job. More than sufficient interpretation and analysis of results. Sufficient to address objectives |
Conclusions and Recommendations Addressing Executive Objectives (25% or 25 points) |
Inadequate summary of results of analysis and no action recommendations offered. Few insights Zero (0) score if not provided. |
Non-specific summary of results provided, and a start but imprecise insights and recommendations. |
Specific summary of results provided. Good insights, connections to next steps and recommendations. Realistic |
Summary of results and recommendations are excellent. Demonstrates solid insights, connections to next steps and recommendations. Realistic. |
Report Format and Organization ** (5% or 15 points) |
Sections are poorly organized. Organizationally the report feels messy Formatting errors exist. |
Most necessary sections included but one or two are poorly organized and organizationally needs improvement but could be better. Formatting errors exist. |
All necessary sections included but organizationally the report is professional and constructed with care. Minimal formatting errors exist. |
All necessary sections included, and effectively organized. No formatting errors exist. |
Visual Supplements Integrated (5% or 15 points) |
No visual supplements such as tables or graphs included. Failure to include may lead to a zero (0) |
Supplements included (graphs, tables, exhibits) but construction needs improvement (labels, design, etc.) |
Nearly enough supplements included. Formats a proper but not complete |
Right number of supplements included. Provides valuable information that is clear, professionally presented, and insightful. Constructed properly |
Grammar Mechanics Sentences and Style (10% or 30 points) |
There are numerous grammatical errors exist and impede meaning. Report has numerous punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Sentences contains many errors and impede meaning. Style is not concise or professional. |
Grammatical errors exist but generally don’t impede meaning. Report has some punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Sentences contain some errors but do not impede meaning. Style is generally concise and professional, but some additional editing is warranted. |
Few grammatical errors exist and do not impede meaning. Report has a few punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Sentences contain few errors that do not impede meaning. Style is concise and professional. Both sentences and style are good. Editing and proofreading is good. |
No grammatical errors exist. Report has no punctuation, spelling, or capitalization errors. Sentences contain no errors and are diverse and sophisticated. Style is concise and professional. Care taken in the editing and proofreading of the report. |
Excel (10% or 30 points) |
Excel document not complete Excel infrequently used as quantitative tool Difficult to interpret Zero (0) if Excel not submitted |
Somewhat complete Somewhat modifiable, traceable, auditable, and readable Somewhat uses Excel as a powerful quantitative tool Interpretation accessible |
Mostly complete Mostly modifiable, traceable, auditable, and readable Mostly uses Excel’s functionality as a powerful quantitative tool Mostly able to follow and interpret |
Excellent Modifiable, traceable, auditable, and readable Uses Excel functionality to its full capability Easy to follow and interpret |
(100%)
** Construct the format of the report based on the report’s needs not based on the rubric
Adopted from document originally developed for WRIT 300 – Advanced Expository Writing
,
Sheet 1
Table 1 | |
Field | Description |
ID | Unique passenger identifier |
Gender | Gender of the passenger (Female/Male) |
Age | Age of the passenger |
Customer Type | Type of airline customer (First-time/Returning) |
Type of Travel | Purpose of the flight (Business/Personal) |
Class | Travel class in the airplane for the passenger seat |
Flight Distance | Flight distance in miles |
Departure Delay | Flight departure delay in minutes |
Arrival Delay | Flight arrival delay in minutes |
Departure and Arrival Time Convenience | Satisfaction level with the convenience of the flight departure and arrival times from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Ease of Online Booking | Satisfaction level with the online booking experience from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Check-in Service | Satisfaction level with the check-in service from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Online Boarding | Satisfaction level with the online boarding experience from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Gate Location | Satisfaction level with the gate location in the airport from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
On-board Service | Satisfaction level with the on-boarding service in the airport from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Seat Comfort | Satisfaction level with the comfort of the airplane seat from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Leg Room Service | Satisfaction level with the leg room of the airplane seat from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Cleanliness | Satisfaction level with the cleanliness of the airplane from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Food and Drink | Satisfaction level with the food and drinks on the airplane from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
In-flight Service | Satisfaction level with the in-flight service from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
In-flight Wifi Service | Satisfaction level with the in-flight Wifi service from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
In-flight Entertainment | Satisfaction level with the in-flight entertainment from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Baggage Handling | Satisfaction level with the baggage handling from the airline from 1 (lowest) to 5 (highest) – 0 means "not applicable" |
Satisfaction | Overall satisfaction level with the airline (Satisfied/Neutral or unsatisfied) |
&"Helvetica,Regular"&12&K000000&P
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.