Please answer the following two HR questions and please cite your sources in APA format. Please use the resources attached as references for in text
Please answer the following two HR questions and please cite your sources in APA format. Please use the resources attached as references for in text citations.
Please answer the following two HR questions and please cite your sources in APA format. Please use some of the resources attached as references.
Question 1:
Strategic planning is a process that helps an organization allocate its resources to capitalize on opportunities in the marketplace. Let's look at a fictitious example of strategic decision making:
ABC Corporation has an organizational objective to implement new technologies to streamline various processes. HR notices a trend toward applicants with excellent customer service skills but without the technical skills that align with this organizational goal. Given this information, HR might inform senior management of this gap in skills an offer the strategic solution to hire these candidates, but also provide them with technical training to give them the skills necessary to serve the organizational objective.
Now, it's your turn.
Post an example of how HR might use knowledge of external and/or internal forces to inform strategic decision making in an organization, including the following:
· Choose an external or internal force that affects HR – for example, changing demographics, globalization, technology
· Identify an organizational goal that relates to that force.
· Identify a potential challenge related to that goal that HR may face.
· Assess the gap between the force you've chosen and the relevant organizational goal.
· Suggest an approach to bridging that gap.
· Include in-text citations to support your post.
Question #2:
What is the organizational structure of an organization you work for or have been involved in? How is it aligned to the mission and vision of your organization?
Describe an example of an organizational structure in use and explain how the structure aligns with the mission and vision of the organization.
,
5/20/22, 10:59 PMFunctional Areas of Business
Page 1 of 4https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/functional-areas-of-business-.html?ou=683266
Functional Areas of Business
What you'll learn to do: Identify the primary functional areas within a business and describe their contribution to the organization
The decisions about how best to use the factors of production to provide the goods or services of the
business require a team of people working in a variety of jobs. As businesses grow larger and their products
and services become more complex, the number of functional areas within a business grows. Each
functional area makes specific and valuable contributions to the organization as a whole. In this section we
will explore some of the most common functional areas in a business and how each contributes to the
overall success of the business.
Learning Outcomes
Identify the primary functional areas within a business
Identify key people and explain the activities within each functional area
Introduction
Just as different functions in the human body are performed and regulated by different organs, different
functions within a business are performed and controlled by different parts of the business. One of the
reasons for separating business operations into functional areas is to allow each to operate within its area of
expertise, thus building efficiency and effectiveness across the business as a whole. The key functional areas
of a business are the following:
Management
Operations
Marketing
Accounting
Finance
Management
The primary role of managers in business is to supervise other people’s performance. Most management
activities fall into the following categories:
Planning: Managers plan by setting long-term goals for the business, as well short-term strategies
Learning Resource
5/20/22, 10:59 PMFunctional Areas of Business
Page 2 of 4https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/functional-areas-of-business-.html?ou=683266
needed to execute against those goals.
Organizing: Managers are responsible for organizing the operations of a business in the most efficient
way, enabling the business to use its resources effectively.
Controlling: A large percentage of a manager’s time is spent controlling the activities within the
business to ensure that it’s on track to achieve its goals. When people or processes stray from the path,
managers are often the first ones to notice and take corrective action.
Leading: Managers serve as leaders for the organization, in practical as well as symbolic ways. The
manager may lead work teams or groups through a new process or the development of a new product.
The manager may also be seen as the leader of the organization when it interacts with the community,
customers, and suppliers.
Operations
Operations is where inputs (factors of production) are converted to outputs (goods and services).
Operations is like the heart of a business, pumping out goods and services in a quantity and of a quality that
meets the needs of the customers. The operations manager is responsible for overseeing the day-to-day
business operations, which can encompass everything from ordering raw materials to scheduling workers to
produce tangible goods.
Marketing
Marketing consists of all that a company does to identify customers’ needs and design products and services
that meet those needs. The marketing function also includes promoting goods and services, determining
how the goods and services will be delivered, and developing a pricing strategy to capture market share
while remaining competitive. In today’s technology-driven business environment, marketing is also
responsible for building and overseeing a company’s Internet presence (e.g., the company website, blogs,
social media campaigns, etc.). Today, social media marketing is one of the fastest growing sectors within the
marketing function.
Accounting
Accountants provide managers with information needed to make decisions about the allocation of company
resources. This area is ultimately responsible for accurately representing the financial transactions of a
business to internal and external parties, government agencies, and owners/investors. Financial
accountants are primarily responsible for the preparation of financial statements to help entities both inside
and outside the organization assess the financial strength of the company. Managerial accountants provide
information regarding costs, budgets, asset allocation, and performance appraisal for internal use by
management for the purpose of decision-making.
Finance
Although related to accounting, the finance function involves planning for, obtaining, and managing a
company’s funds. Finance managers plan for both short- and long-term financial capital needs and analyze
the impact that borrowing will have on the financial well-being of the business. A company’s finance
department answers questions about how funds should be raised (loans vs. stocks), the long-term cost of
borrowing funds, and the implications of financing decisions for the long-term health of the business.
5/20/22, 10:59 PMFunctional Areas of Business
Page 3 of 4https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/functional-areas-of-business-.html?ou=683266
Answer the following questions to see how well you understand the topics covered in this
chapter. This short quiz does not count toward your grade in the class, and you can retake it
as many times as you wish.
Use this quiz to decide whether to study the chapter further or move on.
Choose the BEST answer.
Question 1
What business function is responsible for making sure that organizational strategies and goals
are aligned with staffing plans?
operations
management
accounting
Question 2
InfoTech is a computer application firm based in Silicon Valley and has been responsible for
introducing some of the highest rated applications available for personal productivity. Two
brothers originally founded the company, but they quickly realized they needed to convert the
business into a corporation and establish functional areas within the company to handle
various aspects of operations. The company is now considering expanding operations by
building a production facility in another country. The Board of Directors has approved this
move, and now it will become the responsibility of which functional area to secure the
necessary funding for the expansion?
marketing
accounting
finance
Question 3
What function is responsible for ensuring that products and services, which are produced or
provided, meet high quality standards?
finance
accounting
operations
Check Your Knowledge
5/20/22, 10:59 PMFunctional Areas of Business
Page 4 of 4https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/functional-areas-of-business-.html?ou=683266
Licenses and Attributions
Introduction to Functional Areas (https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-
introbusiness/chapter/functional-areas/) from Introduction to Business by Linda Williams and Lumen
Learning is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license. UMGC has modified this work and it is available
under the original license.
Functional Areas of Business (https://courses.lumenlearning.com/wmopen-
introbusiness/chapter/functional-areas-of-business-2/) from Introduction to Business by Linda Williams
and Lumen Learning is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) license. UMGC has modified this work and it is available
under the original license.
© 2022 University of Maryland Global Campus
All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the validity or integrity of information located at
external sites.
,
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 1 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
Common Organizational Structures
Organizations can be structured in various ways. The structure of an organization determines how it
operates and performs.
Functional Structure
Key Terms
silo—in business, a unit or department in which communication and collaboration occur vertically,
with limited cooperation outside the unit
departmentalization—organization into groups by function, geographic location, or other factors
Organizations commonly use a functional structure, which divides people into smaller groups by areas of
specialty such as IT, finance, operations, and marketing. Some refer to these functional areas
as silos because they are operate vertically and are disconnected from each other. In a functional
organizational structure, the company’s top management team typically consists of several functional
heads, such as the chief financial officer and the chief operating officer. Communication generally occurs
within each department and is transmitted across departments through the department heads.
Functional structures appear in a variety of organizations across many industries. They may be most
effective within large corporations that produce relatively homogeneous goods. Smaller companies that
require more adaptability and creativity may feel confined by the silos that functional structures tend to
produce.
Advantages of a Functional Structure
Learning Resource
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 2 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
Functional Structure at FedEx
This organizational chart shows a broad functional structure at FedEx. Each function—such as HR, finance, and marketing—is
managed from the top down via functional heads (CFO, CIO, vice presidents, etc.).
Functional departments arguably permit greater operational efficiency, because employees with shared
skills and knowledge are grouped together. Each group of specialists can therefore operate independently.
Management acts as the point of cross-communication between functional areas. This arrangement
enables specialization.
Disadvantages of a Functional Structure
A disadvantage of this structure is the tendency for functional groups to not communicate with one
another, potentially decreasing flexibility and innovation. Functional structures may also be susceptible to
tunnel vision, with each function perceiving the organization only from its group's frame of reference.
Recent trends to mitigate these disadvantages include using cross-departmental teams and promoting
cross-functional communication.
Divisional Structure
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 3 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
Key Terms
parent company—an entity that owns or controls another entity
division—a section of a large company
subsidiary—a company owned by a parent company or holding company
A divisional structure groups organizational functions into divisions by product or region. Each division
contains all the necessary resources and functions to support a particular product line or geography (e.g.,
its own finance, IT, and marketing departments). Product and geographic divisional structures may be
characterized as follows:
Product departmentalization. A divisional structure organized by product departmentalization means
that the various activities related to the product or service are under the authority of one manager. If
the division builds luxury sedans or SUVs, for example, the SUV division will have its own sales,
engineering, and marketing departments distinct from the departments within the luxury sedan
division.
Geographic departmentalization. Geographic departmentalization involves grouping activities based
on geography, such as an Asia/Pacific or Latin America division. Geographic departmentalization is
particularly important if tastes and brand responses differ across regions, as it allows for flexibility in
product offerings and marketing strategies (an approach known as localization).
A common legal structure known as the multidivisional form (M-form) also uses the divisional structure. In
this form, a parent company owns subsidiary companies, each of which uses its brand and name. The
whole organization is ultimately controlled by central management; however, most decisions are left to
autonomous divisions. This business structure is typically found in companies that operate worldwide—for
example, Virgin Group is the parent company of Virgin Mobile and Virgin Records.
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 4 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
US Department of Energy Organizational Chart
DOE divisions are organized under three undersecretaries. Each DOE division has a specific responsibility: nuclear security,
science, or energy.
Advantages of a Divisional Structure
Generally, divisions work best for companies with wide variance in product offerings or regions of
geographic operation. The divisional structure can be useful because it affords the company greater
operational flexibility. In addition, the failure of one division does not directly threaten the others. In the
multidivisional structure, subsidiaries benefit from the use of the brand and capital of the parent company.
Disadvantages of a Divisional Structure
Some disadvantages of this structure include operational inefficiencies from separating specialized
functions—for example, finance personnel in one division not communicating with those in other divisions.
Disadvantages of the multidivisional structure can include increased accounting and tax implications.
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 5 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
Matrix Structure
The matrix structure is a type of organizational structure in which individuals are grouped by two different
operational perspectives simultaneously. This structure has both advantages and disadvantages but is
generally best employed by companies large enough to justify the increased complexity.
In matrix management, the organization is grouped by two perspectives the company deems most
appropriate. Common organizational perspectives include function and product, function and region, or
region and product. In an organization grouped by function and product, for example, each product line will
have management that corresponds to each function. If the organization has three functions and three
products, the matrix structure will have nine (3 × 3) potential managerial interactions. Thus, matrix
structures are inherently more complex than other more linear structures.
Advantages of a Matrix Structure
Proponents of matrix management suggest that it allows team members to share information more readily
across task boundaries, countering the tendency to construct silos within functional management. Matrix
structures also allow for specialization that can both increase depth of knowledge and assign individuals
according to project needs.
Disadvantages of a Matrix Structure
A disadvantage of the matrix structure is the increased complexity in chain of command when employees
are assigned to both functional and project managers. The higher manager-to-worker ratio that sometimes
results can increase costs or lead to conflicting employee loyalties. It can also create a gridlock in decision
making if a manager on one end of the matrix disagrees with another manager. Blurred authority in a
matrix structure can reduce agility in decision making and conflict resolution.
A matrix structure should generally only be used when the operational complexity of the organization
demands it. A company that operates in various regions with various products may require interaction
between product development teams and geographic marketing specialists—suggesting a matrix may be
applicable. Generally, larger companies with a need for a great deal of cross-departmental communication
benefit most from this model.
Team-Based Structure
The team structure is considered a newer structure for large organizations. It is less hierarchical, less
structured, and more fluid than traditional structures like functional or divisional organization. A team is a
group of employees—ideally with complementary skills and synergistic efforts—working toward a common
goal. Teams are created by grouping employees in a way that generates a variety of expertise and
addresses a specific operational component of an organization. These teams can change and adapt to fulfill
group and organizational objectives.
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 6 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
Some teams endure over time, while others—such as project teams—are disbanded when a project ends.
Teams that include members from different functions are known as cross-functional teams. Although
teams are described as less hierarchical, they typically still include a management structure.
Critics argue that using the word team to describe modern organizational structures is a fad, and that some
teams are not really teams at all but rather groups of staff. That said, team-building is now a frequent
practice of many organizations and can include activities such as bonding exercises and even overnight
retreats to foster team cohesion. To the extent that these exercises are meaningful to employees, they can
be effective in improving employee motivation and company productivity.
Integration With Other Structures
One aspect of team-based structures that will likely persist indefinitely is the integration of team cultures
within a broader structure (e.g., a functional structure with teams interspersed). Such integration allows for
the authority and organization of a more concrete structure while at the same time capturing the cross-
functional and projected-oriented advantages of teams.
For example, imagine Procter & Gamble brings together a group of employees from finance, marketing, and
research and development—all representing different geographic regions. This newly created team is
tasked with creating a laundry detergent that is convenient, economical, and aligned with the company’s
manufacturing capabilities. The project team might be allocated a certain number of hours a month to
devote to team objectives; however, members of the team would still be expected to continue with their
responsibilities within their functional departments.
Network Structure
Key Terms
synergistic—cooperative, working together, interacting, mutually stimulating
hierarchical—classified or arranged according to various criteria into successive ranks or grades
In the network structure, managers coordinate and control both internal and external relationships with
their firm. The network structure is a newer type of organizational structure often viewed as less
hierarchical (i.e., more flat), more decentralized, and more flexible than other structures. Managers
coordinate and control relations that are both internal and external to the firm.
The concept underlying the network structure is the social network—a social structure of interactions. At
the organizational level, social networks can include intraorganizational or interorganizational ties
representing either formal or informal relationships. At the industry level, complex networks may include
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 7 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
technological and innovation networks that may span several geographic areas and organizations. From a
management perspective, the network structure is unique among the other structures in that it focuses on
the internal dynamics within the firm.
A network organization sounds complex, but it is a simple concept. Take, for example, a T-shirt design
company. Because the company is mainly interested in design, it may not want to get too heavily involved
in either manufacturing or retail—both necessary aspects of the business. So, although the company may
rent retail space, it may purchase production capabilities from partner organizations with manufacturing
facilities. While the core company focuses mainly on designing products and tracking finances, this
network of partnerships enables much more than just a design operation.
Advantages of a Network Structure
Proponents argue that the network structure is more agile compared to other structures (functional,
division, and even some team structures). Silos are minimized and communication flows freely, possibly
opening up more opportunities for innovation. Because the network structure is decentralized, it has fewer
tiers in its organizational makeup, a wider span of control, and a bottom-up flow of decision making and
ideas.
Disadvantages of a Network Structure
On the other hand, this more fluid structure can lead to more complex relationships in the organization. For
example, lines of accountability may be less clear, and reliance on external vendors can be quite high.
These potentially unpredictable variables essentially reduce the core company’s control over operational
success.
Modular Structure
Key Terms
disaggregation—division or breaking up into constituent parts, particularly categories which have
been lumped together
modular—consisting of separate units, especially where each unit performs a specified function
and can then be mixed and matched with other units to connect, interact, or exchange resources
In the modular structure, an organization focuses on developing specialized and relatively autonomous
strategic business units (SBUs). The modular structure divides a business into small, tightly knit SBUs that
focus on specific elements of the organizational process. Interdependence among the units is limited
because the focus of many SBUs is more inward than outward, and loyalty within SBUs tends to be very
strong.
5/20/22, 10:59 PMCommon Organizational Structures
Page 8 of 8https://leocontent.umgc.edu/content/umuc/tus/hrmn/hrmn495/2225/learning-resource-list/common-organizationalstructures.html?ou=683266
The term modularity is widely used in studies of technological and organizational systems. Product systems
are deemed modular when they can be broken down into a number of components that can then be mixed
and matched to connect, interact, or exchange resources. Modularization leads to disaggregating the
traditional form of hierarchical governance into relatively small, autonomous organizational units, or
modules. Modules are not generally interdependent, so the modular organization is extremely flexible.
For example, a firm that employs contract manufacturing rather than in-house manufacturing is using an
independent organizational component. The organization can switch between different contract
manufacturers that perform different functions (and the contract manufacturer can similarly work for
different companies). Another modular model, one that is more internally focused, involves various
consumer services catering to dramatically different needs or demographics. In health care, for example,
the surgery unit may interact with various other hospital departments at different times for different
reasons.
Advantages of a Modular Structure
One advantage of the modular structure is that loosely coupled structures can enable organizations to be
more flexible and restructure more easily. For example, a company using a modular structure can respond
more quickly to different market needs. An organization can also fill its internal corporate needs by
creating a new modular department that operates interdependently with the whole.
Disadvantages of a Modular Structure
On the other hand, more internalization and more tightly coupled structures can produce better
communication and intellectual property gains. As a result, critics of the modular organization argue that a
firm's modularity should be limited to the extent that its flexible nature affords gains. Various degrees of
modularity are possible but not necessarily useful if the pros do not outweigh the cons. Managers must
carefully consider whether or not a modular structure would be useful, either entirely or partially, for their
own organizations.
Licenses and Attributions
Common Organizational Structures (https://courses.lumenlearning.com/boundless-
management/chapter/common-organizational-structures/) from Boundless Management by Lumen
Learning, originally published by Boundless.com, is available under a Creative Commons Attribution-
ShareAlike 4.0 International (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/) license. UMGC has
modified this work and it is available under the original license.
© 2022 University of Maryland Global Campus
All links to external sites were verified at the time of publication. UMGC is not responsible for the validity or integrity of information located at
external sites.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.