Please use article in link at end https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/organisation-management/5b-understanding-ofs/managing-
Please use article in link at end
https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/organisation-management/5b-understanding-ofs/managing-internal-external-stakeholders
In this assignment, you will critique a health or healthcare program based on the provided literature. Before beginning this assignment, please visit the module Resources section and explore the program critique reading resource.
This assignment will help you predict the importance of a system-thinking approach in program planning. It will help you consider how to construct your program planning team. This activity will also help you understand the role of adequate communication when developing a program plan, design, and evaluation.
Findings from this assignment will help you analyze and improve your program’s team development and communication aspects.
Prompt
Write a program critique that examines a health or healthcare program intended to meet a specific health need.
Specifically, you must address the following rubric criteria:
- Systems Thinking: Explain how the program considers a systems-thinking approach in program planning. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
- What role does systems thinking play in making program planning more adaptive, transparent, and evidence based?
- How does systems thinking help with team development and communication?
- Stakeholders’ and Team Members’ Roles: Analyze the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders and team members in the program’s planning. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
- How did the inclusion of stakeholders help minimize the risks associated with the program?
- What would you change in the given program’s team-building efforts to make it more collaborative?
- Communication Tools and Techniques: Determine whether the program’s activities and resources use adequate communication tools and techniques to achieve the desired outcomes. Consider the following questions to guide your response:
- How did ineffective communication negatively impact the given program and its stakeholders?
- What would you change to improve the communication with the stakeholders?
- Summary and Recommendations: Summarize your findings from the program analysis, and share at least two recommendations about the appropriate use of systems thinking and inclusion of stakeholders in program planning. Consider the following question to guide your response:
- How would you use systems thinking to plan the activities for the given program differently?
Note that all the claims in your deliverable should be evidence based. Your citations should be from your independent search for evidence (not from the scenario, textbook, or module resources) of credible sources and be current within the last five years. You are required to cite a minimum of two sources overall. Refer to the Shapiro Library Guide: Nursing—Graduate located in the Start Here section of the course for additional support. If you need writing support, access the Online Writing Center through the Academic Support module of your course.
Guidelines for Submission
Your submission should be a 2- to 3-page Word document. Also include a title page. Use 12-point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style.
Supporting Materials
The following resources support your work on the assignment:
https://www.healthknowledge.org.uk/public-health-textbook/organisation-management/5b-understanding-ofs/managing-internal-external-stakeholders
IHP 670 Program Critique Template
Use this template to help you format your program critique assignments in this course. If you choose to use this template, be sure to replace all text in brackets with your responses and remove the bracketed text before submitting this completed template for grading.
Please note that not all the suggested information in this template may be applicable to your assignment, depending on the module in which you submit it. Refer to your specific module’s program critique guidelines and rubric for additional details.
Name: [Insert student name.]
Date: [Insert date.]
APA-formatted reference for article reviewed in this critique: [Insert APA-formatted reference]
Introduction
[Insert a paragraph that includes the article/resource title and the author and summarizes the core idea or goal of the program. Also, provide a 1- to 2-sentence summary of your critique for this program.]
Program Summary
[Insert a summary of the program based on information you gained from reviewing the provided resource. You may include information such as population need, targeted population and location, resources used, activities or interventions implemented, outcome measures and desired results, and authors’ conclusions and recommendations.
Be sure to address rubric-specific criteria from your module’s program critique guidelines and rubric information in this section, as appropriate.]
Critique
[Insert your critique of this program based on information you gained from reviewing the provided resource and other module resources. You may include information such as strengths and weaknesses of the program, whether the program results reflected success, and whether you agreed with the author or program’s conclusions and/or recommendations, as well as why you feel that way.
Be sure to address rubric-specific criteria from your module’s program critique guidelines and rubric information in this section as appropriate.]
Conclusion
[Insert a paragraph that summarizes the major points of the program and your critique. You may include information such as summarizing the key activities and results of the program, stating whether you believe the program should be replicated for other populations and why, and expressing your conclusions with suggestions for how future programs can use this program’s experience.
Be sure to address rubric-specific criteria from your module’s program critique guidelines and rubric information in this section as appropriate.]
,
IHP 670 Program Critique Guide
This guide will help you understand the purpose and step-by-step process of writing a program critique. Use it to help you construct your program critique activities in the course.
The first step to critiquing an article is to understand the difference between the verbs “to criticize” and “to critique.” According to Seager (2018), “criticism is judgmental and focused on finding fault, while critique is descriptive and balanced” (para. 6). The following chart compares these two actions:
|
Critique |
Criticism |
|
Comes from a position of expertise |
Comes from a position of ignorance |
|
Constructive (offers ideas to improve components of the program) |
Destructive (emphasizes what was done wrong) |
|
Selfless (respects the author’s work) |
Selfish (advances personal goals) |
|
Specific |
Vague |
|
Focuses on the creation of the program and its component parts |
Focuses on the creator of the program |
|
Offered to assist the author |
Offered to highlight faults within the work |
The program critique assignments ask that you critique a program described within an identified article. These articles were chosen because they relate to the module’s topics and demonstrate some common problems that programs encounter. Critique the program’s components—its resources, activities, outcome measures, and use of feedback loops. Find areas that could be/need to be improved and offer recommendations. The following outline will help you structure your critique. We have also included a Sample Critique for you to review.
Critique Paper
1. Format your cover page per APA guidelines.
2. Introduce the assigned article with the title, authors, and an appropriate citation. Present the main point of the article. Describe the health or healthcare need or disparity the program tries to address.
3. Briefly summarize the program described within the article. Include a description of the program’s goals and desired outcomes.
4. Identify key resources and activities used.
5. Determine if the desired results were achieved. Did the author(s) report statistical significance?
6. Describe any actions the program takes to adjust and improve.
7. Review the program aspects you believe were well done; review the aspects you believe should be strengthened.
8. Summarize your analysis of the program.
9. Offer recommendations for future programs designed to address similar needs or disparities.
Reference
Seager, T. P. (2018). Critique vs. criticism. https://medium.com/storygarden/critique-vs-criticism-36ddf0d191ff
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
