A murderer, who experienced years of abuse at
1. A murderer, who experienced years of abuse at the hands of his victim, finally "snapped" and killed his girlfriend. Should this offender be considered for a sentence of community supervision? Why or why not? In addition to providing justification with resources, detail two factors you took into consideration in determining whether or not they should receive this sentence.
2. A college student who has no previous criminal record engaged in reckless driving and a pedestrian was killed as a result. Should this offender be considered for a sentence of community supervision? Why or why not? In addition to providing justification with resources, detail two factors you took into consideration in determining whether or not they should receive this sentence
Below are scenarios of two crimes. The questions for the discussion follow each of the scenarios.
1. A murderer, who experienced years of abuse at the hands of his victim, finally "snapped" and killed his girlfriend. Should this offender be considered for a sentence of community supervision? Why or why not? In addition to providing justification with resources, detail two factors you took into consideration in determining whether or not they should receive this sentence.
2. A college student who has no previous criminal record engaged in reckless driving and a pedestrian was killed as a result. Should this offender be considered for a sentence of community supervision? Why or why not? In addition to providing justification with resources, detail two factors you took into consideration in determining whether or not they should receive this sentence.
,
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment – CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 1/4
CJIF Program Discussion Rubric 11/2020 Course: CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222)
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Content of
original
post/demon
stration of
material
command/in
tegration of
course
materials
and other
readings.
/ 2020 points
Demonstrate
d a clear
understandi
ng of the
weekly
material/sub
ject and
articulated
command of
content/subj
ect into well
stated post
responses;
and/or
displayed
critical
thinking by
bringing in
more than 2
relevant
resources
and by
promoting
significant
further
thought on
the topic.
Points
available: 18
-20
17.9 points
Displayed a
good
understandi
ng of
weekly
material
/subject that
was
presented in
most posts;
and/or
displayed
critical
thinking by
bringing in at
least 2
relevant
resources
promoting
further
thoughts on
the topic.
Points
available: 16
-17.9
15.9 points
Displayed an
understandi
ng of weekly
material/sub
ject but did
not fully
articulate
their
understandi
ng; and/or
displayed
minimal
critical
thinking by
bringing in
only 2
relevant
resources
that
minimally
promoted
further
thoughts on
the topic.
Points
available:
14-15.9
13.9 points
Displayed
very little
understandi
ng of the
weekly
material
/subject and
did not
articulate an
understandi
ng; and/or
did not
demonstrate
critical
thinking as
evidenced
by having 1
or less
relevant
resources
which
minimally
promoted
further
thoughts on
the topic;
and/or
displayed
poor
command of
subject
matter.
11.9 points
Failed to
display any
understandi
ng of the
week's
materials;
and/or
incorrectly
addressed
the weekly
material/sub
ject; and/ or
did not
display
critical
thinking; or
did not bring
in relevant
resources to
support
thoughts; or
did not
promote
further
thoughts on
the topic; or
did not
display
command of
subject
matter.
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment – CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 2/4
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Timeliness
of original
post
/ 5
Points
available:
12-13.9
Points
available F: 0
– 11.9
No post = 0
5 points
Posts
original
discussions
by day two
(2) of the
academic
week.
Points
available:
4.5-5
4.4 points
Posts
original
discussions
by day three
(3) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 4-
4.4
3.9 points
Posts
original
discussions
by day four
(4) of the
academic
week.
Points
available:
3.5-3.9
3.4 points
Posts
original
discussion
by day five
(5) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 3-
3.4
2.9 points
Posts
original
discussion
by day six (6)
or seven (7)
of the
academic
week. Points
available
F: 0-2.9
No Post = 0
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment – CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 3/4
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Peer
response
content/we
ekly
involvement
in discussion
board.
/ 10
Timeliness
of peer
posts.
/ 5
10 points
Engaged in
discussion
with at least
three (3)
peers
whereby an
idea was
built upon or
refuted and
displayed
exemplary
critical
thinking.
Points
available: 9-
10
8.9 points
Engaged in
discussion
with at least
two (2) peers
whereby an
idea was
built upon or
refuted and
displayed
good critical
thinking.
Points
available: 8-
8.9
7.9 points
Engaged in
discussion
with at least
one (1) peer
whereby an
idea was
built upon or
refuted.
Points
available: 7-
7.9
6.9 points
Replies to
others but
did not built
upon or
refute peer
thoughts.
Points
available D:
6-6.9
F: 0-5.9
0 points
Did not
engage in
discussion
with peers
5 points
Posts peer
discussions
by day three
(3) of the
academic
week.
Points
available:
4.5-5
4.4 points
Posts peer
discussions
by day four
(4) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 4-
4.4
3.9 points
Posts peer
discussions
by day five
(5) of the
academic
week.
Points
available: 3.5
-3.9
3.4 points
Posts peer
discussion
by day six (6)
of the
academic
week.
Points
available D:
3-3.4
2.9 points
Posts peer
discussion
on day six
(7) of the
academic
week. Points
available
Points
available F:
0-2.9
No Post = 0
4/30/22, 8:16 AM Rubric Assessment – CCJS 100 7382 Introduction to Criminal Justice (2222) – UMGC Learning Management System
https://learn.umgc.edu/d2l/lms/competencies/rubric/rubrics_assessment_results.d2l?ou=631928&evalObjectId=3664125&evalObjectType=5&userId=2… 4/4
Total / 50
Overall Score
Criteria Excellent Above Average
Average Below Average
Poor Criterion Score
Adherence
to
Discussion
Forum
Standards
and
Guidelines.
/ 1010 points
All standards
followed as
required (i.e.
APA format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available: 9-
10
8.9 points
1 discussion
standard not
followed (i.e.
APA format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available: 8-
8.9
7.9 points
2-3
discussion
standards
not followed
(i.e. APA
format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available: 7-
7.9
6.9 points
4 or more
discussion
standards
not followed
(i.e. APA
format;
grammar;
citations;
references,
other
standards as
required).
Points
available D:
6-6.9
Points
available F:
0-5.9
0 points
No posts for
the
discussion.
Excellent –
Equivalent to
an A 45 points minimum
Above Average –
Equivalent to an B 40 points minimum
Average –
Equivalent to
an C 35 points minimum
Below Average –
Equivalent to an D 30 points minimum
Poor –
Equivalent to
an F 0 points minimum
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
