Workplace Environment Assessment
Order Instructions
Assignment: Workplace Environment Assessment
Clearly, diagnosis is a critical aspect of healthcare. However, the ultimate purpose of a diagnosis is the development and application of a series of treatments or protocols. Isolated recognition of a health issue does little to resolve it.
In this module’s Discussion, you applied the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory to diagnose potential problems with the civility of your organization. In this Portfolio Assignment, you will continue to analyze the results and apply published research to the development of a proposed treatment for any issues uncovered by the assessment.
To Prepare:
Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template*.
Reflect on the output of your Discussion post regarding your evaluation of workplace civility and the feedback received from colleagues.
Select and review one or more of the following articles found in the Resources:
Clark, Olender, Cardoni, and Kenski (2011)
Clark (2018)
Clark (2015)
Griffin and Clark (2014)
*Template completed in the Week 7 discussion should not be submitted with this assignment.
The Assignment (3-6 pages total):
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment (1-2 pages)
Review the Work Environment Assessment Template you completed for this Module’s Discussion.
Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea you believed prior to conducting the Assessment that was confirmed.
Explain what the results of the Assessment suggest about the health and civility of your workplace.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature (1-2 pages)
Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article(s) you selected.
Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article(s) relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article(s) to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams (1–2 pages)
Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
PLEASE NOTE
Please do not add the template in the paper and do not attach the template to the submission. Only the paper is required for week 9.
Use the template only to collect the information then answer the questions that are required for the assignment.
You will use heading levels for all the required criteria for the paper.
Part 1: Work Environment Assessment
*Template, completed in the week 7 discussion, should not be submitted with this assignment
· Describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment you completed on your workplace.
· Identify two things that surprised you about the results and one idea that you believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
· Explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of your workplace.–
Excellent 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.
The responses thoroughly and clearly identify two surprising things about the results and thoroughly describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain in detail what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
Good 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The responses accurately describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace.
The responses accurately identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed.
The responses accurately explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace.
Fair 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggests about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague or inaccurate.
Poor 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The responses describe the results of the Work Environment Assessment completed on a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses identify two surprising things about the results and describe at least one idea that was believed prior to conducting the assessment that was confirmed that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain what the results of the assessment suggest about the health and civility of a workplace that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Part 2: Reviewing the Literature
· Briefly describe the theory or concept presented in the article you selected.
· Explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of your Work Environment Assessment.
· Explain how your organization could apply the theory highlighted in your selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams. Be specific and provide examples.–
Excellent 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The responses accurately and thoroughly describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.
The responses accurately and completely explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately and thoroughly explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
Specific and detailed examples are provided which fully support the responses.
Good 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
The responses accurately describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected.
The responses accurately explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or stronger work teams.
Specific examples are provided which may support the responses.
Fair 11 (11%) – 11 (11%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate.
The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague or inaccurate.
Vague or inaccurate examples are provided which may support the responses.
Poor 0 (0%) – 10 (10%)
The responses describe the theory or concept presented in the article selected that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain how the theory or concept presented in the article relates to the results of the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
The responses explain how an organization could apply the theory highlighted in the selected article to improve organizational health and/or create stronger work teams that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.
Specific examples are not provided to support the responses.
Part 3: Evidence-Based Strategies to Create High-Performance Interprofessional Teams
· Recommend at least two strategies, supported in the literature, that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.
· Recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in your Work Environment Assessment.–
Excellent 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
Using the literature, the responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses clearly and thoroughly recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
Good 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Using the literature, the responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
The responses accurately recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment.
Fair 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague or inaccurate, or only recommends one strategy.
Poor 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
Using the literature, the responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to address any shortcomings revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
The responses recommend at least two strategies that can be implemented to bolster successful practices revealed in the Work Environment Assessment that is vague and inaccurate, only recommends one strategy, or is missing.
Resource Synthesis–
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource.
Fair 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources.
Poor 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided, which delineates all required criteria.–
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided, which delineates all required criteria.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated but are brief and not descriptive.
Fair 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Poor 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity less than 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion is provided.
Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.–
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Fair 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Poor 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting:
The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.–
Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (one or two) APA format errors.
Fair 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (three or four) APA format errors.
Poor 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (five or more) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_6053_Module04_Week09_Assignment_Rubric
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
