MY Selected Research Topic: Supply Chain Flexibility and Firm Performance evaluation (excluding title page and References section) of your research on globa
100% Original Work only
I hv already selected research topic from Weekly Learning resource,
Plz read questions, & instruction carefully
Paper should be follow Rubric Superior Criteria
Week 7 Final paper (Due in 2 days) Urgent/.Week 7 Final paper (Required Assignment) so Urgent.docx
100% Original Work (9 Pages Required) excluding title page and References section (Due in 2 days)
Paper must be follow Rubric Superior Criteria
Paper Format attached according to Rubric
Assignment: Final Paper
MY Selected Research Topic: Supply Chain Flexibility and Firm Performance
Submit an 9- to 12-page evaluation (excluding title page and References section) of your research on global supply chain management. In your evaluation, be sure to address the following:
Analysis of the Field
· What is your analysis of the state of the field of global supply chain management? Describe important issues or current dilemmas in the field.
Research Topic
· State and provide background information for your research topic.
· What are the current theories and areas of debate for your topic?
· Are there particular industries or technologies that will be impacted by your topic? If this impact is positive, how can it be maximized, and if negative, how can this impact be mitigated?
Future Directions
As a global change agent, consider the future directions of global supply chain management to address the following:
· Indicate specific areas of further research in this topic that would prove beneficial.
· What potential impact might the topic that you have chosen have on the overall state of the field and the future directions of global supply chain management research in the next 3–5 years?
· Identify the implications for future social change from your topic area.
Be sure to review the Final Paper Guidelines and Week 7 Assignment Rubric. Use the APA Course Paper Template, located in the Learning Resources for this 2-week unit. Your paper should include the following headings: Analysis of the Field, Research Topic, and Future Directions. Please Note: For each page of your paper, you must include a minimum of two APA-formatted scholarly citations.
Follow Week 7 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
Paper Format According to Rubric
Element 1: Research Topic – Analysis of the Field
Element 2a: Research Topic – Background Information
Element 2b: Research Topic – Current Theories and Areas of Debate
Element 2c: Research Topic – Industries or Technologies Impacted
Element 3a: Future Directions – Further Research
Element 3b: Future Directions – Overall State of the Field
Element 3c: Future Directions – Future Social Change
Element 4: Critical Thinking
Conclusion
Element 5: Written Delivery Style & Grammar
Element 6: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations)
Rubric Detail
|
|
Superior Criteria |
Excellent Criteria |
Satisfactory Criteria |
Marginal Criteria |
Unsatisfactory Criteria |
Not Submitted |
|
Element 1: Research Topic – Analysis of the Field |
40 (20%) Student presents a thorough and detailed analysis of the state of the field of global supply chain management and thoroughly describes important issues or current dilemmas in the field. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
38 (19%) Student presents a thorough and detailed analysis of the state of the field of global supply chain management and thoroughly describes important issues or current dilemmas in the field. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors. |
34 (17%) Student presents an analysis with some details of the state of the field of global supply chain management and describes important issues or current dilemmas in the field. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
30 (15%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete analysis with vague or missing details of the field of global supply chain management and describes with vague or missing details of the important issues or current dilemmas in the field. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
20 (10%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 2a: Research Topic – Background Information |
10 (5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of the background information for his/her research topic. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
9.5 (4.75%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of the background information for his/her research topic. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors. |
8.5 (4.25%) Student presents an evaluation with some details of the background information for his/her research topic. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
7.5 (3.75%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation with vague or missing details of the background information for his/her research topic. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
5 (2.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 2b: Research Topic – Current Theories and Areas of Debate |
10 (5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of the current theories and areas of debate for his/her research topic. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
9.5 (4.75%) Student presents a thorough and detailed evaluation of the current theories and areas of debate for his/her research topic. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors. |
8.5 (4.25%) Student presents an evaluation with some details of the current theories and areas of debate for his/her research topic. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
7.5 (3.75%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete evaluation with vague or missing details of the current theories and areas of debate for his/her research topic. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
5 (2.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 2c: Research Topic – Industries or Technologies Impacted |
10 (5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of any particular industries or technologies that will be impacted by his/her topic and, if impact is positive, explains how it can be maximized and, if negative, explains how this impact can be mitigated. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
9.5 (4.75%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of any particular industries or technologies that will be impacted by his/her topic and, if impact is positive, explains how it can be maximized and, if negative, explains how this impact can be mitigated. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors. |
8.5 (4.25%) Student presents an explanation with some details of any particular industries or technologies that will be impacted by his/her topic and, if impact is positive, explains how it can be maximized and, if negative, explains how this impact can be mitigated. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
7.5 (3.75%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of any particular industries or technologies that will be impacted by his/her topic and, if impact is positive, explains how it can be maximized and, if negative, explains how this impact can be mitigated. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
5 (2.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 3a: Future Directions – Further Research |
10 (5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of specific areas of further research on this topic that would prove beneficial. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
9.5 (4.75%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of specific areas of further research on this topic that would prove beneficial. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors. |
8.5 (4.25%) Student presents an explanation with some details of specific areas of further research on this topic that would prove beneficial. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
7.5 (3.75%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of specific areas of further research on this topic that would prove beneficial. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
5 (2.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 3b: Future Directions – Overall State of the Field |
10 (5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of the potential impact the topic that he/she has chosen might have on the overall state of the field and the future directions of global supply chain management in the next 3–5 years. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
9.5 (4.75%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of the potential impact the topic that he/she has chosen might have on the overall state of the field and the future directions of global supply chain management in the next 3–5 years. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors. |
8.5 (4.25%) Student presents an explanation with some details on the potential impact the topic that he/she has chosen might have on the overall state of the field and the future directions of global supply chain management in the next 3–5 years. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
7.5 (3.75%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details on what potential impact the topic that he/she has chosen might have on the overall state of the field and the future directions of global supply chain management in the next 3–5 years. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
5 (2.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 3c: Future Directions – Future Social Change |
20 (10%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of the implications for future social change from his/her topic area. Several sources and examples support thinking. |
19 (9.5%) Student presents a thorough and detailed explanation of the implications for future social change from his/her topic area. Several sources and examples support thinking. There are one or two minor errors in explanation. |
17 (8.5%) Student presents an explanation with some details of the implications for future social change from his/her topic area. Some sources and examples support thinking. |
15 (7.5%) Student presents a cursory or incomplete explanation with vague or missing details of the implications for future social change from his/her topic area. Few sources or examples support thinking. |
10 (5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 4: Critical Thinking |
30 (15%) Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments. |
28.5 (14.25%) Writing exhibits excellent evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking; careful examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with detailed supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned, superb arguments. There are one or two minor errors in explanation. |
25.5 (12.75%) Writing exhibits some evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. A good examination is made of assumptions and possible biases, with some supporting rationale. Writing synthesizes the classroom experiences and content; analyzes patterns or connections between theory and practice; and draws logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments adequately, but not superbly. |
22.5 (11.25%) Writing exhibits little evidence of thoughtful critical analysis and thinking. Examination is not made of assumptions and possible biases. Writing does not synthesize the classroom experiences and content, nor analyze patterns or connections between theory and practice. Logical conclusions based on well-reasoned arguments are not exhibited. |
15 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 5: Written Delivery Style & Grammar |
30 (15%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are no spelling or grammar errors. |
28.5 (14.25%) Student consistently follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are one or two minor errors in spelling or grammar. |
25.5 (12.75%) Student mostly follows APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style. Student mostly communicates in a cohesive, logical style. There are some errors in spelling or grammar. |
22.5 (11.25%) Student does not follow APA writing style and basic rules of formal English grammar and written essay style and does not communicate in a cohesive, logical style. |
15 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
|
Element 6: Formal and Appropriate Documentation of Evidence, Attribution of Ideas (APA Citations) |
30 (15%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements, including for each page of his/her paper a minimum of two APA-formatted scholarly citations, and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. There are no APA errors. |
28.5 (14.25%) Student demonstrates full adherence to scholarly reference requirements, including for each page of his/her paper a minimum of two APA-formatted scholarly citations, and adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. There are one or two minor errors in APA style or format. |
25.5 (12.75%) Student mostly adheres to scholarly reference requirements, including for each page of his/her paper a minimum of two APA-formatted scholarly citations, and mostly adheres to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. There may be some errors in relevance of sources and/or APA format and style. |
22.5 (11.25%) Student demonstrates weak or inconsistent adherence scholarly reference requirements, does not include for each page of his/her paper a minimum of two APA-formatted scholarly citations, and/or weak or inconsistent adherence to APA style with respect to source attribution, references, heading and subheading logic, table of contents, and lists of charts, etc. There are several errors in APA format and style. |
15 (7.5%) Does not meet minimal standards. |
0 (0%) Did not submit element. |
Week 7 Final paper (Due in 2 days) Urgent/Lerning Resources.docx
MY Selected Research Topic: Supply Chain Flexibility and Firm Performance
U can use some reference from below list
Recommended Readings
Avittathur, B., & Jayaram, J. (2016). Supply chain management in emerging economies. Decision, 43(2), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40622-016-0130-8
Jean, R.-J., Wang, Z., Zhao, X., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2016). Drivers and customer satisfaction outcomes of CSR in supply chains in different institutional contexts: A comparison between China and Taiwan. International Marketing Review, 33(4), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-04-2014-0115
Maryniak, A. (2017). Competitive instruments preferred by customers versus the level of pro-environmental activities in a supply chain. LogForum, 13(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2017.2.4
Moosmayer, D. C., & Davis, S. M. (2016). Staking cosmopolitan claims: How firms and NGOs talk about supply chain responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 135(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2456-5
Recommended Readings
Bag, S., Wood, L. C., Xu, L., Dhamija, P., & Kayikci, Y. (2020). Big data analytics as an operational excellence approach to enhance sustainable supply chain performance. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104559
Maheshwari, S., Gautam, P., & Jaggi, C. K. (2021). Role of big data analytics in supply chain management: current trends and future perspectives. International Journal of Production Research, 59(6), 1875-1900. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1793011
Maloni, M. J., Hiatt, M. S., & Astrachan, J. H. (2017). Supply management and family business: A review and call for research. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 23(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2016.12.002
Rodríguez-Ferradas, M. I., & Alfaro-Tanco, J. A. (2016). Open innovation in automotive SMEs suppliers: An opportunity for new product development. Universia Business Review, 50, 142–157. https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2016.V13.N2.05
Tarei, P.K., Thakkar, J.J., & Nag, B. (2020). Benchmarking the relationship between supply chain risk mitigation strategies and practices: An integrated approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 27(5), 1683-1715. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2019-0523
Nematollahi, M., Hosseini-Motlagh, S.-M., & Heydari, J. (2017). Coordination of social responsibility and order quantity in a two-echelon supply chain: A collaborative decision-making perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.11.017
Wang, C., Zhang, Q., & Zhang, W. (2020). Corporate social responsibility, green supply chain management and firm performance: The moderating role of big-data analytics capability. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 37, 100557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2020.100557
Recommended Readings
Flynn, B. B., Koufteros, X., & Lu, G. (2016). On theory in supply chain uncertainty and its implications for supply chain integration. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 52(3), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/jscm.12106
Ishida, S. (2020). Perspectives on supply chain management in a pandemic and the post-COVID-19 era. IEEE Engineering Management Review, 48(3), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMR.2020.3016350
Mandal, S. (2016). Towards an integrated logistics capabilities model of supply chain flexibility: A social exchange perspective. Romanian Economic and Business Review, 11(3), 44–67.
Maurer, S. M. (2017). The new self-governance: A theoretical framework. Business & Politics, 19(1), 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2016.4
Oey, E., Wijaya, W. A., & Hansopaheluwakan, S. (2020). Forecasting and aggregate planning application-a case study of a small enterprise in Indonesia. International Journal of Process Management and Benchmarking, 10(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPMB.2020.104229
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
