Which Is Better: Traditional Or Online Education? Should Schools Have Armed Guards? It should comprise of 8 paragraphs including an introduction,
I need Rogerian Argument write up for the following topics;
1. Which Is Better: Traditional Or Online Education?
2. Should Schools Have Armed Guards?
It should comprise of 8 paragraphs including an introduction, 6 body paragraphs and a conclusion followilng the Rogerian Argument guidelines and requirements on the attached documents.
I will need the work done in 12 hours from now.
1. Use the Outline you completed in last week's lesson. Write your introduction paragraph, including your previously written thesis statement, and write a complete Rogerian Argument essay of 8 paragraphs. Refer back to the Annotated Rogerian Argument Outline to be sure that you're meeting the purpose of each paragraph.
The essay should include the following:
• MLA Format
· It should have 8 paragraphs( an introduction, 6 body paragraphs, and a conclusion)
• 4-5 pages (double spaced), not including the Works Cited page
• In-text citations in the body of the essay
• Works Cited page with your credible sources
• Minimum of 4 sources ( same sources used for the outline and any other additions as deemed necessary).
Annotated Rogerian Argument Outline
Reflect on the goal of a Classical Argument: to take a position on one side of an issue and try to persuade the audience by refuting the opposing position. Now, consider that a Rogerian Argument objectively explores both sides of the same issue, identifying common ground and proposing a compromise based on that common ground.
This is an annotated outline, meaning it explains the purpose of each paragraph. Read through this document, then use your understanding of the paragraph goals to construct your own outline. A skeleton outline is included at the end of the document for you to copy/paste and build your own outline. Be sure to include all of these paragraphs in the correct order.
Before you begin
Consider the rhetorical situation:
Your Audience: Two groups who share a common problem but disagree about how to solve it.
Your Purpose: To explain each perspective to the other side so that their common goal or value becomes clear, then to propose a compromise that brings each side together to move towards achieving the goal.
Your Role: Although you may prefer one approach over the other, your role is to be an objective mediator who reduces the conflict by proposing a compromise that benefits both sides. Word choice and tone must be free of bias.
Parts of a Rogerian Argument • Introduction:
Provide some history and context for the issue and provide an overview of the controversy or disagreement surrounding it. Appeal to pathos to make a connection with the audience so that they, too, feel a need to reach a compromise. Then, state a thesis that is a Claim of Fact, noting the disagreement and suggesting a way forward through compromise.
• Body Paragraphs:
1. Overview of Side A. Keep the tone objective and support this paragraph by using research that accurately illustrates the views of that side. (Think of this as Side A’s “main claim.”)
2. Validation of Side A. Identify and explain the most convincing points of Side A’s argument. Help the reader see the link between these points and Side’s A’s ultimate goal or value. (Think of this as Side A’s “sub-claims.”)
3. Overview of Side B. Keep the tone objective and support this paragraph by using research that accurately illustrates the views of that side. (Think of this as Side B’s “main claim.”)
4. Preferability of Side B. Focus on the parts of Side B’s viewpoint that are most convincing and use logos and ethos evidence to demonstrate their strength. (Think of this as Side B’s sub-claims).
5. Use one or more paragraphs to do the following:
a. concede that Side B’s perspective is not perfect (provide details), but
b. show that Side B’s approach will best meet the goals and/or values of both sides (explain how and support with evidence).
6. Restate the issue to remind the audience that both sides share a common problem. Point out that both sides have a common goal and shared values, then propose a compromise that will reduce the conflict and move both parties towards the common goal. The compromise must be something new that neither side has considered and it must be achievable. Do not propose something that has already been tried and failed. Do not ask either side to simply change their minds about their position.
Review the strongest points of both sides and identify overlap in views and shared goals. Remind them that the proposed compromise will achieve some, if not all, of the hoped-for outcomes of both sides. Provide a call to action or a warning about the consequences of inaction.
See the next page for a skeleton outline you can copy and paste to create your outline.
II. SIDE A
III. SIDE B
b. PREFERABILITY OF THIS POSITION
IV. CONCESSION AND ADDITIONAL SUPPORT FOR SIDE B
V. PROPOSED COMPROMISE
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we\'ll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.