Imagine that your supervisor has approached you, stating that they feel that recognition is a factor that needs to be addressed with employees in or

IND502 Rubric: Winner, Winner

Criteria Exemplary Proficient Progressing Incomplete Not addressed or Not submitted

25 – 23 points 22-20 points 19-17 points 16-1 points 0 points Goals

At least three goals for the recognition program are clearly articulated. Each goal is specific to Speedy Pro, measurable, and highly inclusive. No goals pivotal to success are missing.

Two goals for the recognition program are articulated. Each goal is specific to Speedy Pro, measurable, and inclusive. No goals pivotal to success are missing. Minor points need further clarification so that the reader understands your chosen goals.

Two goals for the recognition program are identified. Each goal somewhat relates to Speedy Pro, is measurable, and is fairly inclusive. More information is necessary so that the reader understands your chosen goals and how your goals contribute to program success.

An attempt is made to identify at least one goal for the recognition program; the attempt is either over-simplified or overly complicated, not inclusive of major employee groups and lacks measurability. The goals do not relate to Speedy Pro. Extensive edits are necessary so that the reader understands your chosen goals and how your goals could contribute to program success.

Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

25 – 23 points 22-20 points 19-17 points 16-1 points 0 points

Types of

Recognition

The types of recognition provided by the program are highly appropriate to promote further and deeper engagement, broad and applicable across a range of employees. The cost of recognition is appropriate.

The types of recognition provided by the program are appropriate to promote further engagement, broad and applicable across a range of employees. The cost of recognition is appropriate.

The types of recognition provided by the program may be a bit over- simplified or overly complex and partially supports employee engagement, is applicable for only a subset of employees, and/or may not be appropriate in terms

The types of

recognition provided

by the program are

identified, but the

attempt is either over-

simplified or overly

complex, incomplete,

and does not support

employee

engagement. Many

employees are left out

Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

Minor points need further clarification so that the reader understands your employee recognition plan.

of cost. More information is necessary for the reader to understand your employee recognition plan.

of the employee

recognition plan. The

costs may not be

appropriate to what is

being offered.

Extensive edits are

necessary for the

reader to understand

your employee

recognition plan.

25-23 points 22 – 20 points 19-17 points 16-1 points 0 points

Implementation A clear, concise plan for implementing the program is provided, including who will own the program, an inclusive communication plan for the employees, and a clear plan for promoting the program.

A clear plan for implementing the program is provided, including who will own the program, a communication plan for the employees, and a plan for promoting the program. Minor points need further clarification so that the reader understands your plan for implementation.

A very basic outline for implementing the program is provided, including who will own the program, a communication plan for the employees, and a plan for promoting the program. Your plan is missing several important details and/or may be overly simplistic. More information is needed so that the reader understands your plan for implementation.

A plan to implement the program is attempted, but major elements are missing or confusing to the reader. Major facets of your plan may be unrealistic. Your plan is missing a lot of detail and/or may be overly simplistic. Extensive edits are necessary for the reader to understand your plan for implementation.

Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.

15-13 points 12-11 points 10-9 points 8-1 points 0 points

Measuring Success

Metrics and data collection methods are clearly and concisely explained and align seamlessly with the goals of the program.

Metrics and data collection methods are concisely explained and align with the goals of the program. Minor points need further clarification so that the reader fully

Metrics and data collection methods are identified; the connection with the goals of the program is not clearly stated. More information is necessary for the reader to fully

An attempt is made to identify the metrics and data collection methods; the connection with the goals of the program is missing or contains assumptions,

Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy

understands how you will measure success.

understands how you will measure success.

inaccuracies, or potential biases. Extensive edits are necessary for the reader to fully understands how you will measure success.

10-9 points 8-7 points 6-5 points 4-1 points 0 points

Presentation

The choice of presentations mode is appropriate to your audience and the plan you are sharing. The presentation skillfully communicates the message(s) and the language flows seamlessly throughout; there are minimal problems with spelling, punctuation, and grammar; APA style guidelines for citations and references are followed accurately.

The choice of presentation mode is appropriate to your audience and the plan you are sharing. There are few problems with organization, clarity, or conventions that should have been fixed. APA style guidelines for citations and references are followed, with only minor errors.

The choice of presentation mode is somewhat inappropriate for your audience and/or the plan you are sharing. Numerous mechanical errors are distracting; organization of ideas are lacking, but not enough to interfere with meaning. APA style guidelines for citations and references are attempted, with major errors.

The choice of presentation mode is entirely inappropriate for audience and/or the plan you are sharing. Frequent problems with organization, clarity and/or conventions make the paper hard to read. APA style guidelines for citations and references are not adhered to, which increases the risk of plagiarism.

Criterion not addressed. No submission. Does not adhere to Academic Honesty Policy.