Read the following 3 articles and synthesize (Combine the ideas of all three sources into one overall point – DO NOT SUMMARIZE) ?

Educators’ Challenges of Including Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in Mainstream Classrooms

Sally Lindsay*, Meghann Proulx, Nicole Thomson and Helen Scott

Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, The University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Although children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are increasingly being placed within mainstream classes, little is known about the challenges that teachers encounter with including them as full participants in the class. This qualitative study draws on a purposive sample of 13 educators who have experience teaching children with ASD within two cities in Ontario, Canada. Through in-depth interviews we asked about teachers’ challenges regarding creating an inclusive environment within their classroom. Teachers reported several challenges, including: understanding and managing behaviour; socio-structural barriers (i.e., school policy, lack of training and resources); and creating an inclusive environment (i.e., lack of understanding from other teachers, students and parents). Teachers recommend that more resources, training and support are needed to enhance the education and inclusion of children with ASD.

Keywords: Asperger’s; autism spectrum disorder; children; inclusive education; mainstream classroom; qualitative research; social inclusion; teachers

Introduction

Educators have reported a notable increase in students with autism over the past few years (Geneva Centre for Autism, 2010; Lindsay et al., 2013). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is one of the most common childhood neurological disorders (Autism Society Canada, 2010), which is characterised by problems in communication (i.e., delay or lack of lan- guage development), social development (i.e., lack of development of peer relationships, impaired non-verbal behaviour), ritualistic behaviour and resistance to change (American Psychiatric Association, 2012). With more students with ASD in mainstream classrooms, educators are expected to create an inclusive educational environment, often with few or no guidelines on how to do so (Horrocks, White, & Roberts, 2008; Lindsay et al., 2013). Researchers have also highlighted that many schools are struggling to keep pace in meet- ing the needs of students with ASD (Humphrey & Lewis, 2008; Symes & Humphrey, 2010). Many teachers and parents agree that more needs to be done to create inclusive social environments within classrooms (Hinton, Sofronoff, & Sheffield, 2008; McGregor & Campbell, 2001; Smith & Brown, 2000). Despite these obstacles, very little is known about educators’ challenges with teaching children with ASD.

Evidence on inclusive education shows that successful implementation of inclusive principles can lead to increased student engagement in social interaction, higher levels

*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2013 Vol. 60, No. 4, 347–362, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.846470

� 2013 Taylor & Francis

of social support, social networks and advanced education goals compared with their counterparts in segregated settings (Bredekamp & Copple, 1997; Chandler-Olcott & Kluth, 2009; Eldar, Talmor, & Wolf-Zukerman, 2010; Vakil, O’Connor, & Kline, 2009). Despite these potential benefits, the inclusion of children with ASD in the mainstream classroom can be challenging for teachers.

Given the social and behavioural impairments of children with ASD, teachers often face considerable obstacles in appropriately managing their needs (Bowe, 2004; Wilmhurst & Brue, 2010; Lindsay et al., 2013). Evidence consistently shows that many teachers feel unprepared to support students with ASD socially, academically, and behaviourally (Hinton et al., 2008; Horrocks et al., 2008; Symes & Humphrey, 2010). Indeed, one of the most important challenges in working with students with autism in integrated classrooms is inadequate knowledge about ASD and lacking access to con- sultation support and advice (De Boer & Simpson, 2009). For example, one UK-based study found that only 5% of teachers received training about autism even though the majority of teachers had a child with autism in their class (McGregor & Campbell, 2001). Such gaps in training can leave teachers feeling discouraged while students with ASD may miss opportunities to reach their full potential (Allen & Cowdery, 2005; War- nock, 2005). Past research has typically focused on the challenges of managing individ- ual behaviours in attempting to include children with ASD in the classroom. This study addresses an important gap in the literature by also exploring the socio-structural factors influencing the inclusion of these children. As a first step in building a more inclusive environment where children are all considered an equally valued member of the class (Eldar et al., 2010), it is critical to understand the challenges educators may encounter when creating inclusive classroom environments, particularly for children with ASD.

In Ontario, Canada, where this study was conducted, school boards are required to provide students with exceptionalities (i.e., behavioural, communication, intellectual, physical or multiple) with appropriate special education programmes and services to best meet their educational needs (Lindsay, Proulx, Scott, & Thomson, 2013; Ontario Ministry of Education, 2012). Such students may receive these services once an Identification, Placement and Review Committee have formally identified them (Ontario Ministry of Education, 2012; Lindsay et al., 2013).

Within Ontario, Canada, the Ministry of Education has identified the inclusion of students with ASD in school environments as an area of priority for action (Lindsay et al., 2013; Minister’s ASD Reference Group, 2007). Other researchers also highlight the need to develop a better understanding of educators’ challenges in working with children who have ASD (Davis & Florian, 2004; Humphrey & Parkinson, 2006; National Autism Society, 2003). The Ontario Ministry of Education (2012) has sup- ported this inclusive approach with the Education Act and a commitment to support children with disabilities in the Ontario school curriculum (Lindsay et al., 2013).

Theoretical Perspective: Inclusive education

The provision of inclusive and accepting social climates within schools is necessary to help children reach their full potential and for them to feel important, welcome, and appreciated (De Winter, Baeveldlt, & Kooistra, 1999). The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) stipulates that all children, “should enjoy a full and decent life, in conditions which ensure dignity, promote self-reliance and facilitate the child’s active participation in the community” (Article 23). We draw on Lipsky and Gartner’s (1997) model on the essential elements of inclusion to inform our analysis.

348 S. Lindsay et al.

Their model outlines seven essential elements that can be used to guide an inclusive education programme. These elements include: visionary leadership, collaboration, refo- cused use of assessment, support for staff and students, funding, effective parental involvement as well as curricular adaptation and effective instructional practices. This model offers a framework by which inclusion can be achieved (Lynch & Irvine, 2009), and is consistent with Ferguson’s (1995) concept of authentic inclusion where organ- ising an education programme based on these elements can meet the needs of all stu- dents. We argue that applying best-practice elements of inclusion may be difficult for teachers who are including students with high-functioning autism within their class.

Methods

This qualitative design explored educators’ challenges in and strategies for including children with ASD in mainstream classrooms (see Lindsay et al. [2013] for methods and findings on strategies) while applying Lipsky and Gartner’s (1997) model of essen- tial elements of inclusion. Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics review boards at a children’s hospital and two local district school boards.

Sample

This study drew on a purposive sample of educators to gain a better understanding of the challenges they experience when including children with ASD in their classrooms. Teachers were recruited through contacts with a local district school board. Information letters were given to contacts of designated schools. Once the school board approved the project, information letters were sent to teachers who were thought to meet the inclusion criteria (see below). Participants who were interested in taking part contacted the research team to set up a convenient time to be interviewed. Each participant was screened by telephone to determine eligibility prior to the interview. Participants were included if they met the following criteria: they had at least two years of teaching expe- rience in an integrated class; they are currently an educator within an elementary school within a local district school board; and/or they have experience teaching a student with ASD within a mainstream class (Lindsay et al., 2013).

Our sample consisted of 13 educators (10 females, three males) who taught a wide range of classes (see Table 1) (Lindsay et al., 2013). While current teaching roles may not necessarily have been within a “regular” classroom (i.e., one teacher was currently employed in a developmental disability programme, and six teachers were working in a special education room), each educator interviewed was asked to draw on their previous experiences, ranging from three to 22 years, teaching in a mainstream classroom. Satu- ration was reached when no new or relevant data emerged (Strauss & Corbin, 1998). Five of the teachers were based at a school in a rural area while eight were at an urban school setting. Twelve of the teachers had earned additional qualifications in special education (Lindsay et al., 2013).

Data Gathering

The interviews followed an in-depth, semi-structured format exploring teachers’ challenges on including children with ASD in mainstream classrooms. The first two authors conducted the interviews between June 2011 and February 2012—these lasted an average of 38 minutes (Lindsay et al., 2013). Informed consent was obtained from

Educators’ Challenges of Including Children with ASD 349

T ab le

1 .

P ar ti ci p an t su m m ar ie s.

T ea ch er

G en d er

C u rr en t ex p er ie n ce

P re v io u s ex p er ie n ce

R el ev an t ed u ca ti o n an d tr ai n in g

C h al le n g es

C u rr en t ro le a

T y p e o f

sc h o o l (r u ra l,

u rb an )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(y ea rs )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(G ra d es )

B E d b

M E d c

S E A Q d

S ch o o l- b as ed

au ti sm

tr ai n in g e

1 M al e

S p ec ia l ed u ca ti o n

te ac h er

U rb an

1 0

4 – 6

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

2 M al e

D D f cl as sr o o m

te ac h er

U rb an

4 4 – 8

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

3 F em

al e

G ra d e 2 /3

te ac h er

g R u ra l

1 4

2 U

– U

– S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d

m an ag in g b eh av io u r

4 F em

al e

G ra d e 3 te ac h er

R u ra l

11 1 – 8

U –

U U

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

5 F em

al e

G ra d e 1 te ac h er

R u ra l

1 2

JK – 6

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

(C o n ti n u ed )

350 S. Lindsay et al.

T ab le

1 . (C o n ti n u ed .)

T ea ch er

G en d er

C u rr en t ex p er ie n ce

P re v io u s ex p er ie n ce

R el ev an t ed u ca ti o n an d tr ai n in g

C h al le n g es

C u rr en t ro le a

T y p e o f

sc h o o l (r u ra l,

u rb an )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(y ea rs )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(G ra d es )

B E d b

M E d c

S E A Q d

S ch o o l- b as ed

au ti sm

tr ai n in g e

6 F em

al e

G ra d e 7 te ac h er

R u ra l

1 5

1 /2

g , 6

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

M an ag in g an d u n d er st an d –

in g b eh av io u r

7 F em

al e

S p ec ia l ed u ca ti o n

te ac h er

R u ra l

2 1

1 – 6

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

8 F em

al e

T ea ch er

(o n le av e)

N /A

2 2

J/ K h – 8

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

9 F em

al e

G ra d e 7 /8

te ac h er

g U rb an

1 3

6 – 8

U –

– –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

(C o n ti n u ed )

Educators’ Challenges of Including Children with ASD 351

T ab le

1 . (C o n ti n u ed .)

T ea ch er

G en d er

C u rr en t ex p er ie n ce

P re v io u s ex p er ie n ce

R el ev an t ed u ca ti o n an d tr ai n in g

C h al le n g es

C u rr en t ro le a

T y p e o f

sc h o o l (r u ra l,

u rb an )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(y ea rs )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(G ra d es )

B E d b

M E d c

S E A Q d

S ch o o l- b as ed

au ti sm

tr ai n in g e

1 0

F em

al e

S p ec ia l ed u ca ti o n

te ac h er

U rb an

2 0 +

J/ K , S /K

i , 1

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

11 M al e

S p ec ia l ed u ca ti o n

te ac h er

U rb an

8 1 , 2 , 4 , 5 ,

p h y si ca l

ed u ca ti o n

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

1 2

F em

al e

S p ec ia l ed u ca ti o n an d

p h y si ca l ed u ca ti o n

te ac h er

U rb an

5 1 – 6

U U

U U

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

(C o n ti n u ed )

352 S. Lindsay et al.

T ab le

1 . (C o n ti n u ed .)

T ea ch er

G en d er

C u rr en t ex p er ie n ce

P re v io u s ex p er ie n ce

R el ev an t ed u ca ti o n an d tr ai n in g

C h al le n g es

C u rr en t ro le a

T y p e o f

sc h o o l (r u ra l,

u rb an )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(y ea rs )

T ea ch in g

ex p er ie n ce

(G ra d es )

B E d b

M E d c

S E A Q d

S ch o o l- b as ed

au ti sm

tr ai n in g e

1 3

F em

al e

JK /S K

te ac h er

g U rb an

3 JK

/S K g

U –

U –

S o ci o -s tr u ct u ra l b ar ri er s

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ar en ta l en g ag em

en t

In cl u si v e en v ir o n m en t –

p ee r u n d er st an d in g an d

ac ce p ta n ce

U n d er st an d in g an d m an ag –

in g b eh av io u r

N o te s:

a In d ic at es

cu rr en t te ac h in g p o si ti o n . E d u ca to rs

w er e as k ed

to d ra w

o n th ei r cu rr en t an d p re v io u s ex p er ie n ce s.

A ll te ac h er s h ad

p re v io u s ex p er ie n ce

w o rk in g in

m ai n st re am

cl as sr o o m s.

b B ac h el o r o f E d u ca ti o n . A ll ed u ca to rs

re q u ir e th is d eg re e to

te ac h in

O n ta ri o .

c M as te r’ s in

E d u ca ti o n . N o t a re q u ir em

en t.

d S p ec ia l E d u ca ti o n A d d it io n al

Q u al ifi ca ti o n .

e R efl ec ts th o se

ed u ca to rs

w h o ci te d a sc h o o l- b as ed

au ti sm

tr ai n in g p ro g ra m m e (t y p ic al ly

w o rk sh o p s) .

f D ev el o p m en ta l D is ab il it y p ro g ra m m e.

g In d ic at es

a sp li t- g ra d e cl as sr o o m .

h Ju n io r K in d er g ar te n .

i S en io r K in d er g ar te n .

Educators’ Challenges of Including Children with ASD 353

each participant prior to the interview. Demographic information was also collected, including number of years taught, grades taught, type of school (rural/urban) and addi- tional qualifications (refer to Table 1).

Interview questions asked the following: Can you please describe how long you have been teaching for and your training background?; Can you describe the types of children that you have experience teaching (probe for autism)?; What is your approach to teaching children with autism spectrum disorder?; Have you encountered any challenges in educating children with autism within mainstream classes? If so, can you give an example? (probe for essential elements of inclusion according to Lipsky and Gartner’s model); and, Is there anything else that you would like to add that we did not get a chance to talk about? These questions are consistent with Lindsay et al.’s (2013) study.

Data Analysis

The interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed verbatim. The analysis began with the first two authors independently reading through each interview several times and noting key emerging themes. We drew on Lipsky and Gartner’s (1997) model on the essential elements of inclusion (i.e., visionary leadership, collaboration, refocused use of assessment, support for staff and students, funding, effective parental involve- ment, curricular adaptation and effective instructional practices) to inform our analysis. Codes with similar meanings were developed, examined and re-defined as necessary. A constant comparative approach of organising the data with continual adjustment and discussion amongst the research team was used throughout the analysis (Grbich, 2007; Lindsay et al., 2013). Quotes that were reflective of each theme were extracted. Code– recode and peer examination helped to establish the trustworthiness of the findings (Grbich, 2007). An audit trail of analytical decisions regarding the themes was kept.

Results

Challenges in including children with ASD, as reported by the teachers interviewed, are as follows: understanding and managing behaviour; socio-structural barriers (i.e., school policy, lack of training and resources); and creating an inclusive environment (i.e., lack of understanding from other teachers, students and parents). Table 1 provides an over- view of the challenges reported by each educator. We did not notice any patterns regarding the type of school (rural versus urban), the number of years taught, or the grade levels taught and the number or types of challenges that were reported.

Understanding and Managing Behaviour

Understanding and managing student behaviour was a challenge to fully including children with ASD. Teachers felt they lacked adequate information about ASD, particu- larly with respect to specific ways to work with a child in the classroom and how to appropriately manage a child when a behavioural outburst occurs. One teacher gives an example:

There are days where you may have a student with autism who has a meltdown and you can’t deal with it right then and there … You just can’t always work with just one child. (Teacher 12)

354 S. Lindsay et al.

Another behavioural management concern was around how to handle unstructured time such as recesses or field trips, occasions where routines might be broken causing distress in a child with ASD. As one teacher shared:

When we have something like the play day or something that’s not structured, let’s say they’re shooting hoops and [the student] misses three, he gets mad and screams and goes and sits in the corner … He doesn’t know how to have fun if he’s not winning … The chal- lenges are when there’s an outbreak what do you do with the rest of the kids? (Teacher 3)

With multiple children to supervise, this type of situation makes it difficult for teachers, as one teacher said it best: “The biggest challenge is explaining to the other children that [the student with ASD] needs more time or care” (Teacher 10).

Some teachers found it difficult to engage students with ASD in lessons, noting that they often have specific interests and become frustrated when asked to do something else. For example, a teacher said, “It’s difficult to involve my kids with autism into my lessons where they’re engaged and participating in a way that isn’t distracting, yet pro- ductive for them” (Teacher 13). Another teacher also spoke about the challenge of expanding their specific interests:

One student was quite defiant and quite loud and oppositional towards the general class- room structure. He did get along well with at least one other student but it was a constant challenge with his behaviour and trying to include him within the lessons and the class- room because he had his mind set on working on the computer and doing his own thing versus a specific lesson. So inclusion was much more difficult. (Teacher 11)

Establishing a rapport with a student was noted by teachers as being an important element for helping a child in distress to calm down. This was often a difficult task for some teachers, making it challenging to include students with their peers. For example, one teacher describes:

I think the biggest challenge is when they shut down and you don’t know how to get through to them. Like in the primary grade they might get underneath a table, not talk to you and refuse to do what you want. (Teacher 5)

In sum, teachers often felt unprepared to manage the behaviour of a child with ASD.

Socio-structural Barriers

A second challenge with including a child who has ASD involved socio-structural barriers such as lack of training, availability of resources and school policies. Ten teach- ers felt they lacked training and continuing education opportunities on how to work with children with ASD. For example: “There’s a lot of kids who enter the classroom and the teachers don’t know what to do. So these kids are underserviced. If we don’t really understand the core problems with the kids, you can’t really teach them” (Teacher 1). Other teachers described how more support is needed to be able to fully include children with ASD. For instance:

There is very little support for teachers in doing the planning [for students with ASD]. Unless you have Special Education qualifications there really isn’t time or attention given to working on those practices of planning for inclusivity. (Teacher 9)

Educators’ Challenges of Including Children with ASD 355

Some teachers advocated for a more consistent process in training and supporting teachers. For example, in regards to the special education additional qualification courses: “I think the additional qualifications courses in Special Education have to have an autism component. I think boards have a responsibility to in-service their teachers on meaningful professional development for autism” (Teacher 9). Others commented: “We need more teachers especially trained in autism” (Teacher 10). Some teachers said that although training is available on understanding the basics of ASD behaviour, it is not helpful for learning specific teaching methods to work with students. One teacher commented, “There’s a lot about working with students with autism and tracking their behaviors but there’s not a lot of workshops on how to teach them, different strategies” (Teacher 12).

Another teacher noted that approaches to working with children with ASD could be more proactive rather than reactive. For example: “most of the energy is spent on cor- recting difficulties as opposed to making things that are going ok better” (Teacher 4).

Another structural barrier mentioned by eight teachers involved lacking appropriate resources (i.e., financial resources, access to training opportunities, funding for an edu- cation assistant) and equipment (i.e., computer software, assistive technology, “fidget toys”) for students with ASD. One teacher explains:

Access to resources is a problem. For example, you know, I had a boy with autism and it was quite a challenge to get that resource because he was in a regular program. There wasn’t any money assigned to buying the equipment that he would need … assistive equip- ment for example a whoopee cushion … or a weighted vest. Or even, you know took me a long time, even you know the [software]. I had to go to other schools with special needs programs to use their [software]. How is it you are able to program for the student if you don’t have the necessary things to help the student? (Teacher 1)

Teachers found this frustrating and often had to advocate on the child’s behalf on their own time to access these helpful resources. They noted that it was a particular challenge for children with Asperger’s syndrome or high-functioning autism because most of the resources tend to go towards children with lower-functioning autism. For example, one teacher explains:

Even if he just has Asperger’s he’s still on the spectrum but there’s really not a lot of human resource time or financial resource time given to him because, well, it’s just Asperger’s. You know, it’s not like he’s a runner or a hitter or non-verbal or anything like that so kind of “just deal with it” sort of thing. I think it’s really more of the Asperger’s end that I would say is under-funded or under-supported. (Teacher 4)

In addition to lacking resources for equipment and teaching materials, teachers also mentioned there was a lack of funding for education assistants. For example: “There’s very little support in terms of EA [education assistant] time unless the child is a threat to themselves or others in a physical way” (Teacher 7). Another teacher agreed: “It would be nice if they [school board] stopped cutting EAs” (Teacher 2). Seven teachers felt quite strongly about having an education assistant in the classroom to integrate the students with ASD.

Barriers were also found at the school policy level, where teachers described the difficulties in meeting the Ministry of Education standards on test scores despite having children with diverse needs in their classroom. One teacher shared her example:

356 S. Lindsay et al.

With special needs students it makes it really hard because there’s an expectation from the Ministry [of Education] that a certain percentage of kids will get to a certain level and it’s hard when you have those needs in the class and that’s not something they’re going to be able to achieve. (Teacher 4)

Teachers especially felt this pressure when there were students with ASD in their class- room.

Teachers lacked time to provide additional help to children with ASD, especially in older grades where there are larger class sizes. Five of the teachers mentioned that class sizes were a challenge for being able to successfully include a child with ASD. For example, one teacher commented:

For some of these ASD kids when they get into Grade 4 where all of a sudden there are 30 kids in their class, double to what they’re used to having, then the attention from their teacher probably gets cut in half. (Teacher 6)

The increased class sizes contribute to the teachers’ workload, which “can make it diffi- cult to give proper consideration to the way we can support students with special needs” (Teacher 9). Teachers explained that integrated classrooms can be very over- whelming for children with ASD, especially with the class sizes and the noise they can produce. For example: “In an integrated environment they’re lost. There’s too much stimulus, too much everything. The noise, the kids, the class,

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.