Evaluation Plan Project: Evaluation Methodology The why,? who,? when,? what,? and how? of HIT and informatics systems are the thr
Evaluation Plan Project: Evaluation Methodology
The “why,” “who,” “when,” “what,” and “how” of HIT and informatics systems are the threads that are woven throughout the evaluation plan. They help formulate viewpoints and guide goals. Answers to these questions help ensure the positive effects of health information technology and systems on outcomes.
For this work, reflect on viewpoints and the answers to key questions about Health Information Technology Evaluation related to Interoperability. Then, describe the evaluation methodology plan to be used to evaluate the situation in a case study (need to develop a case study).
Work requirement:
In a 3-page describe the evaluation methodology plan to be used to evaluate interoperability in Health Information Technology (HIT).
Be sure to address the following:
· Specify which research design, information sources, and data collection methods to use.
· Identify the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data.
· Provide a list of the stakeholders in your selected case study.
· Justify your selections.
· Write a paragraph describing the key components of your evaluation—the “who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how” of your evaluation.
· Explain how you would measure success in your evaluation. Be specific.
· Explain how you would summarize your results. Be specific.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 1/5
Rubric Detail Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Describe the evaluation methodology plan you would use to evaluate your case study in a 2- to 3-page paper. You will:
Specify which research design, information sources, and data collection methods you would use.
23 (24.21%) – 25 (26.32%)
The response clearly, accurately, and with detail speci�es which research design, information sources, and data collection methods to use.
20 (21.05%) – 22 (23.16%) The response speci�es which research design, information sources, and data collection methods to use.
18 (18.95%) – 19 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately speci�es which research design, information sources, and/or data collection methods to use.
0 (0%) – 17 (17.89%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately speci�es which research design, information sources, and/or data collection methods to use, or fails to address one or more items.
Name: NURS_6541_Week7_Assignment_Rubric EXIT
Grid View List View
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 2/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Identify the types of analyses you would perform on the gathered data.
Justify your selections.
Provide a list of stakeholders in your selected study.
23 (24.21%) – 25 (26.32%)
The response clearly, accurately, and in speci�c detail identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data, justi�es selections, and provides a complete list of stakeholders in the selected study.
20 (21.05%) – 22 (23.16%) The response identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data, justi�es selections, and provides a list of stakeholders in the selected study.
18 (18.95%) – 19 (20%) The response identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data in a vague or inaccurate manner, weakly justi�es selections, and/or provides an incomplete list of stakeholders in the selected study.
0 (0%) – 17 (17.89%)
The response identi�es the types of analyses to perform on the gathered data in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner, provides a weak or nonexistent justi�cation of the selections, and/or provides an incomplete or nonexistent list of stakeholders in the selected study.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 3/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a paragraph describing the key components of your evaluation—the “who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how” of your evaluation.
14 (14.74%) – 15 (15.79%)
The response clearly, accurately, and with speci�c detail describes the components of the evaluation, including the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”
12 (12.63%) – 13 (13.68%) The response describes the components of the evaluation, including the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”
11 (11.58%) – 11 (11.58%) The response describes the components of the evaluation in a vague and/or inaccurate manner, including details regarding the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”
0 (0%) – 10 (10.53%)
The response describes the components of the evaluation in a vague, inaccurate, and/or incomplete manner, including details regarding the "who,” “what,” “when,” “where,” and “how.”
Explain how you would measure success in your evaluation. Be speci�c.
Explain how you would summarize your results. Be speci�c.
14 (14.74%) – 15 (15.79%)
The response clearly, accurately, and in speci�c detail explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.
12 (12.63%) – 13 (13.68%) The response explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.
11 (11.58%) – 11 (11.58%) The response in a vague and/or inaccurate manner explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.
0 (0%) – 10 (10.53%)
The response in a vague, inaccurate, or incomplete manner explains how to measure success in the evaluation and how to summarize the results.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 4/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting — Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well- developed ideas, �ow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.
5 (5.26%) – 5 (5.26%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria.
4 (4.21%) – 4 (4.21%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet are brief and not descriptive.
3 (3.16%) – 3 (3.16%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or o� topic.
0 (0%) – 2 (2.11%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for �ow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.
No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided.
Written Expression and Formatting — English Writing Standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 (5.26%) – 5 (5.26%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
4 (4.21%) – 4 (4.21%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3 (3.16%) – 3 (3.16%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2.11%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
2/24/22, 12:49 PM Rubric Detail – Blackboard Learn
https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/bbgs-deep-links-BBLEARN/app/course/rubric?course_id=_16936340_1&rubric_id=_2920717_1 5/5
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Written Expression and Formatting — The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running heads, parenthetical/in- text citations, and reference list.
5 (5.26%) – 5 (5.26%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
4 (4.21%) – 4 (4.21%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3 (3.16%) – 3 (3.16%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
0 (0%) – 2 (2.11%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 95
Name: NURS_6541_Week7_Assignment_Rubric
EXIT
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
