Patient education is an effective tool in supporting compliance and treatment for a diagnosis. It is important to consider effect
Patient education is an effective tool in supporting compliance and treatment for a diagnosis. It is important to consider effective ways to educate patients and their families about a diagnosis—such as coaching, brochures, or videos—and to recognize that the efficacy of any materials may differ based on the needs and learning preferences of a particular patient. Because patients or their families may be overwhelmed with a new diagnosis, it is important that materials provided by the practitioner clearly outline the information that patients need to know.
Patient Education for Children and Adolescents
Patient education is an effective tool in supporting compliance and treatment for a diagnosis. It is important to consider effective ways to educate patients and their families about a diagnosis—such as coaching, brochures, or videos—and to recognize that the efficacy of any materials may differ based on the needs and learning preferences of a particular patient. Because patients or their families may be overwhelmed with a new diagnosis, it is important that materials provided by the practitioner clearly outline the information that patients need to know.
For this Assignment, you will pretend that you are a contributing writer to a health blog. You are tasked with explaining important information about an assigned mental health disorder in language appropriate for child/adolescent patients and/or their caregivers.
To Prepare
· By Day 1, your Instructor will assign a mood or anxiety disorder diagnosis for you to use for this Assignment.
· Research signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals.
The Assignment
In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience, explain signs and symptoms for your diagnosis, pharmacological treatments, nonpharmacological treatments, and appropriate community resources and referrals. Although you are not required to respond to colleagues, collegial discussion is welcome.
PLEASE NOTE: My own disorder diagnosis is BIPOLAR DISORDER
,
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric's layout.
Content
Name: NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience: • Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis. | Points: Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. | Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. Feedback: |
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback: |
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: |
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list. | Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) APA format errors Feedback: | Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback: |
Show Descriptions Show Feedback
In a 300- to 500-word blog post written for a patient and/or caregiver audience: • Explain signs and symptoms for the assigned diagnosis in children and adolescents.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response accurately and concisely explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response accurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis in language and tone appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains signs and symptoms of the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
· Explain pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments for children and adolescents with the diagnosis.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) The response accurately and concisely explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Good 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) The response accurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Fair 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Poor 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains pharmacological and nonpharmacological treatments. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
· Explain appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The response accurately and concisely explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are engaging and appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Good 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The response accurately explains appropriate community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis in language and tone that are appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Fair 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The response somewhat vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are mostly appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Poor 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The response vaguely or inaccurately explains community resources and referrals for the assigned diagnosis. Language and tone are not appropriate for a patient/caregiver audience. Or the response is missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction are provided that delineate all required criteria.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion are provided that delineate all required criteria. Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are stated, yet they are brief and not descriptive. Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment are vague or off topic. Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity <60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion were provided. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/narrative in-text citations, and reference list.–
Levels of Achievement: Excellent 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors Good 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains one or two APA format errors Fair 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains several (three or four) APA format errors Poor 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (five or more) APA format errors Feedback:
Total Points: 100 |
---|
Name: NRNP_6665_Week5_Assignment_Rubric
,
PLEASE FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS AS INDICATED BELOW:
1). ZERO (0) PLAGIARISM.
2). AT LEAST 5 REFERENCES, NO MORE THAN 5 YEARS (WITHIN 5YRS, OR LESS THAN 5YRS)
3). PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED: Rubric details, Assignment details/Instructions.
4). Please review and follow the grading rubric details, and include each component in the assignment as required. Also, follow the APA 7 writing rules and style/Format.
Thank you.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
