Based on the appraisals of the two articles, complete the following question for both articles mentioned below: 1) http://www.to
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →Based on the appraisals of the two articles, complete the following question for both articles mentioned below:
1) http://www.tobaccopreventioncessation.com/pdf-143077-69866?filename=Efficacy%20and%20safety%20of.pdf
2) A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation (Gary C.K. Chan a, *, Daniel Stjepanovi ́c a, Carmen Lim a, Tianze Sun a,
Aathavan Shanmuga Anandan a, Jason P. Connor a, b, Coral Gartner c, Wayne D. Hall a, Janni Leung a)
Grove: Understanding Nursing Research, 7th Edition
Critical Appraisal for Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis
Group #/Names:
Intervention PIO/PICO Question:
Article citation:
Article design:
Step 1: Did the title indicate if a systematic review or meta-analysis was conducted?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 2: Did the abstract include a structured summary of the research synthesis?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 3: Was a significant, clear clinical question developed to direct the research synthesis?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 4: Were the purpose and/or the objectives or aims of the review expressed?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 5: Was the literature search criteria clearly identified?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 6: Was a comprehensive, systematic search of the research literature conducted?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 7: Was the process for selecting the studies for review detailed?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 8: Were publication biases addressed?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 9: Were key elements of the studies presented?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 10: Were the studies critically appraised and the risks for biases described?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 11: Was a meta-analysis conducted as a part of the systematic review?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 12: Were the results of the review clearly presented?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 13: Did the report conclude with a clear discussion section?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Step 14: Was a clear and concise report developed for publication?
Comments: Quality and rationale
Modified from Grove: Understanding Nursing Research, 7th Edition for educational purposes only.
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds