Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long re
Assessment Description
Students are required to submit weekly reflective narratives throughout the course that will culminate in a final, course-long reflective journal due in Topic 10. The narratives help students integrate leadership and inquiry into current practice.
This reflection journal also allows students to outline what they have discovered about their professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses, and additional resources that could be introduced in a given situation to influence optimal outcomes. Each week students should also explain how they met a course competency or course objective(s).
In each week's entry, students should reflect on the personal knowledge and skills gained throughout the course. Journal entries should address one or more of the areas stated below. In the Topic 10 graded submission, each of the areas below should be addressed as part of the summary submission.
- New practice approaches
- Interprofessional collaboration
- Health care delivery and clinical systems
- Ethical considerations in health care
- Practices of culturally sensitive care
- Ensuring the integrity of human dignity in the care of all patients
- Population health concerns
- The role of technology in improving health care outcomes
- Health policy
- Leadership and economic models
- Health disparities
While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
Rubric reflective journal
Professional Capstone and Practicum Reflective Journal – Rubric
Collapse All Professional Capstone And Practicum Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All
New Practice Approaches
0 points
Criteria Description
New Practice Approaches
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
New practice approaches are present, complete, and incorporate additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
New practice approaches are present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
New practice approaches are present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
New practice approaches are present, but they are incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
New practice approaches are not present.
Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)
0 points
Criteria Description
Interprofessional Collaboration (C4.3)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Interprofessional collaboration information is not present.
Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems
0 points
Criteria Description
Health Care Delivery and Clinical Systems
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Health care delivery and clinical systems information is not present.
Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)
0 points
Criteria Description
Ethical Considerations In Health Care (C2.3)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding ethical considerations in health care is not present.
Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)
0 points
Criteria Description
Practice of Culturally Sensitive Care (C5.3)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the practice of culturally sensitive care is not present.
Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)
0 points
Criteria Description
Preservation of Integrity of Human Dignity in the Care of All Patients (C5.4)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding the preservation of integrity and human dignity in the care of all patients is not present.
Population Health Concerns
0 points
Criteria Description
Population Health Concerns
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information regarding population health concerns is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information regarding population health concerns is not present.
Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)
0 points
Criteria Description
Role of Technology in Improving Health Care Outcomes (C4.1)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information on the role of technology in improving health care outcomes is not present.
Health Policy
0 points
Criteria Description
Health Policy
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Health policy information is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Health policy information is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Health policy information is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Health policy information is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Health policy information is not present.
Leadership and Economic Models
0 points
Criteria Description
Leadership and Economic Models
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information on leadership and economic models is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information on leadership and economic models is not present.
Health Disparities
0 points
Criteria Description
Health Disparities
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Information on health disparities is present, complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Information on health disparities is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Information on health disparities is present Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Information on health disparities is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Information on health disparities is not present.
Outline of Overall Personal Discovery
0 points
Criteria Description
Outline of Overall Personal Discovery
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete, and incorporates additional relevant details and critical thinking to engage the reader.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present and complete. The submission provides the basic information required.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present. Some minor details or elements are missing, but the omissions do not impede understanding.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is present, but it is incomplete or otherwise lacking in required detail.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Outline of what student discovered about professional practice, personal strengths and weaknesses that surfaced, additional resources and abilities that could be introduced to a given situation to influence optimal outcomes, and how the student met the competencies aligned to this course is not present.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. 5: Excellent
0 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. 4: Good
0 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. 3: Satisfactory
0 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. 2: Less Than Satisfactory
0 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. 1: Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
