Using A Sociological Approach Overview For your final assignment, you’ll complete a short answer activity in which you will re
Week 10 Assignment 3 – Using A Sociological Approach
Overview
For your final assignment, you'll complete a short answer activity in which you will review a research article to identify the research conclusion. Then, you'll take another look at that conclusion from the perspective of one of the major sociological theories. Use the Assignment 3 template to complete this assignment.
Learn
Review the Article “Money, Not Access, Key to Resident Food Choices in 'Food Deserts'".
- What were the key findings and conclusions from the research?
Theory
Remember: The four major sociological theories are Functionalism, Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, and Rational Choice Theory.
- Choose one of the four major sociological theories – Functionalism, Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, or Rational Choice Theory. (Review Sections 1.8 – 1.12 in your webtext for more information.)
- In your own words, define the theory that you chose.
- Discuss how this theory relates to the research findings in the article.
Evaluate
- Use the article to help answer the questions below.
- What research method was used in the article?
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this research method? (Your response should be a paragraph of at least 5-7 sentences.) See section 2.9 and table 2.1 of the webtext to review the advantages and disadvantages of the different research methods.
- What additional research should be concluded to learn more about the problem examined in the article? (Your response should be a paragraph of at least 5-7 sentences.)
Week 8 Discussion
Your stakeholders have asked the project team to recommend a solution to an unanticipated issue in the project. Describe how you plan to lead your group to make the best decision; address the four major steps. What project management tools would you use to prevent group think? How would you respond if a team member makes the following suggestion: "We should brainstorm and then critique each other's ideas."
Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.
Classmate response :
Hello All
In this week’s discussion were asked to identify the four major steps in making a decision. Next, we’re asked to consider
the following "We should brainstorm and then critique each other's ideas" from another coworker.
First, let's identify the steps according to the web text
1. Identifying problems.
2. Generating alternatives
3. Reaching a decision.
4. Following up.
In my experience, the more brains the better, sometimes you won't have all the answers that's where a team comes in. There has to
be a situation that a team member or another coworker has experienced before and they could provide a different solution. I'll give you an
example of a situation at work where our team had a hard time with a problem and where we often "We should brainstorm and then critique
each other's ideas" off each other in most situations. Before I came into the picture, a group of 5 diesel techs couldn't figure out a fuel stage
issue with one of our test engines. I'll keep it short but here was the problem before I came in, the engine started, ran, and shut down during
the second stage of warm-up. They identified the problem, generated alternatives, reached a decision, and followed up with the same result.
When I entered the situation, they filled me in with what was going on and what they had already done before I got there. In our line of work,
this is pretty standard and we all know the drill however, we rarely run into second-stage fuel issues. After evaluating everything that has been
done, the engine shouldn't have any issues, but I had one more suggestion replace the fuel pump. They criticized me for considering this because
it wouldn't have started if it was a bad fuel pump, much less go through the warm-up and stage 1. Since this was the last resort, we changed it,
and it completed the stage. This was my example of brainstorming and bouncing ideas off each other.
Christopher
Week 9 discussion
our project sponsor is not familiar with earned value management (EVM). You have been asked to provide him with a quick overview of EVM. Using the information covered in the readings, suggest the top three EVM performance measures (some may also be indexes) on which you would educate your project sponsor. Explain what each measure tells the project manager. Also, identify other performance factors beyond EVM that you would communicate to your sponsor. Provide a rationale for your selection of topics.
Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.
Classmate response
Hello all, this week’s discussion we’re asked to briefly explain earned value management (EVM), what the measures tell the PM,
and what performance factors are beyond EVM. I like to say the book does a great job at explaining this to me, but I need a book like
a PM for dummies for me to read in order to understand it. I did other readings and found a better explanation for me, APMG International
made this simpler.
· Schedule variance (SV): This is a measure of the difference between the work that was actually done against the amount of work that was planned to be done. This clearly shows is the project is on schedule or not. (1. APMG)
· Cost variance (CV): This is the measure of the difference between the amount that was budgeted for the work meant to be done and the amount that was actually spent for the work performed. Thus this shows if the project is on budget or not. (1. APMG)
· Schedule performance index (SPI): This is the ratio between the budget that is approved for the work that is performed to the budget that is approved for the work that was planned in the first place. This is a relative measure of the project’s time efficiency. (1. APMG)
According to the APMG EVM “provide more information than project tracking”, EVM’s answers the Where are we at this point in the project, When will this project be complete, and What will the project cost. (1. APMG) The textbook does discuss what factors may hinder EVM’s such as weather, labor, and contractor delays. Among everything that a PM can experience that will delay a project, I don't want, a tough job.
Christopher
Week 10 Discussion
You have now delivered the project to your customer. The project was delivered ahead of schedule, as requested by your project sponsor, but over budget by 20 percent. Now, it is time to reflect on what went well and what didn’t go well. Based on feedback throughout the course, what would you have done differently in terms of scope, resources, and schedule, and why?
,
1. Week 10 Assignment – Project Execution, Control, and Closure Strategies
Overview
This is the final of three assignments.
At this point, most communication issues have stabilized, and the execution process is producing deliverables. The sponsor, as well as the project team, are now focused on project performance and closure.
Instructions
Write a 3 page paper in which you address the following:
0. Now that the project is in the execution process, summarize your project to date.
1. Describe 3–4 deliverables produced from the execution of your project.
2. Explain how project baselines are established and why they are important to EVM calculations.
2. Note: this relates to project control.
. Explain how you assess the results (what is good, what is bad) when you do EVM calculations. Provide examples using 3–5 EVM metrics.
3. Note: this relates to project control.
. Apply the PMBOK best practices to close your project.
4. Note: this relates to project closure.
. List 3–5 lessons learned from your project. Provide examples.
. Use at least three sources to support your writing. Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. For help with research, writing, and citations, access the library .
,
Assignment 3: Using a Sociological Approach
(Student name)
(Professor’s name)
Introduction to Sociology
(Date)
Learn (Write a paragraph of at least 5 to 7 sentences answering the following questions.)
· What were the key findings from the research? Be sure that you are answering in your own words.
Theory (Write 2 paragraphs of at least 5 to 7 sentences each answering the following questions.)
· Choose one of the four major sociological theories—Functionalism, Conflict Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, or Rational Choice Theory.
(Review the Assignment 3 Cheat Sheet in the Help tab in Blackboard and Sections 1.8 – 1.12 in your Webtext for more information.)
· In your own words, define the theory that you chose.
· Discuss how this theory relates to the research findings in the article.
Evaluate (Write at least 2 paragraphs of at least 5 to 7 sentences each answering the following questions.)
· What research method was used in the article?
· What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this research method? (Your response should be a paragraph of at least 5-7 sentences.)
See section 2.9 and table 2.1 of the Webtext to review the advantages and disadvantages of the different research methods.
· What additional research should be conducted to learn more about the problem examined in the article? (Your response should be a paragraph of at least 5-7 sentences.)
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.