What was happening at the time of the event, the place? (location) or the decision(s) that sheds more light on why the? social m
● What was happening at the time of the event, the place
(location) or the decision(s) that sheds more light on why the
social movement came to be in the first place?
● In what type of society did the event occur? (Example: An urban
one? A rich/ poor one? An educated one? An unstable one? Was
it due to any type of ongoing conflict, new or/and emerging
conflict and injustices?
Five (5) page, double spaced
12- point font
● On Berkeley in the Sixties by California Newsreel
documentary
● A reference page at the end of
your five (5) pages with a
list of sources. This is an
additional page
● Write using the first-person narrative, ensuring that the tone is very
personal.
● Name, identity and embed at
least three (3) of the key
concepts, theories and
definitions of your choice that
best fit and apply within the
documentary you have chosen
to critical self-reflect
Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements Author(s): J. Craig Jenkins Source: Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 9 (1983), pp. 527-553 Published by: Annual Reviews Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2946077 Accessed: 07-02-2020 05:11 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms
Annual Reviews is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annual
Review of Sociology
This content downloaded from 141.217.20.120 on Fri, 07 Feb 2020 05:11:46 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Ann. Rev. Sociol. 1983. 9:527-53
Copyright ? 1983 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved
RESOURCE MOBILIZATION
THEORY AND THE STUDY OF SOCIAL MOVEMENTS
J. Craig Jenkins
Department of Sociology, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211
Abstract
Resource mobilization theory has recently presented an alternative interpreta tion of social movements. The review traces the emergence and recent con troversies generated by this new perspective. A multifactored model of social movement formation is advanced, emphasizing resources, organization, and political opportunities in addition to traditional discontent hypotheses. The McCarthy-Zald (1973) theory of entrepreneurial mobilization is critically assessed as an interpretation of the social movements of the 1960s-1970s, and the relevance of the Olson (1968) theory of collective action is specified. Group organization is argued to be the major determinant of mobilization potential and patterns. The debate between the Gerlach-Hine (1970) and entrepreneurial theories of social movement organization is traced in terms of historical changes in the social movement sector and the persistence of organizational diversity. A model of social movement politics is outlined, building on Gam son's (1975) theory of strategy and Tilly's (1978) polity theory by emphasizing political alliances and processes shaping success and failure. Piven & Cloward (1977) are correct that disruptiveness leads to success and that disruptions can be mobilized without formal organization; they are wrong in asserting that formal organization is necessarily incompatible with mobilization. The future development of resource mobilization theory lies in two directions: extending the polity theory to deal with different states and regimes, including the development of neo-corporatism, and providing a more sophisticated social psychology of mobilization.
527
0360-0572/83/0815-0527$02.00
534 JENKINS
"participation revolution" in American politics but merely reflected improved
facilitative conditions for professionalized mobilization. Professionals and
college students with discretionary time schedules and income, liberal institu-
tions with "slack" resources, and pervasive mass media that could be coopted
by enterprising movement entrepreneurs were the major factors behind the
stormy 1960s. Evidence on political trends, however, indicates a virtual
explosion of unconventional mass political participation between 1960 and
1974. Figure 1 shows that the number of protest demonstrations and riots
escalated dramatically, peaking in the 1967-1972 period. This "participation
revolution" was, in turn, undergirded by a general increase in the mobilization
for unconventional politics as the number of political ideologues increased
from 1% of the citizenry in the 1950s to 19% in 1972, then declining to 7% in
1976 (Nie, Verba & Petrocik 1980:367), membership in political organizations
expanded from 2.8% in 1956 to a peak of 4.4% in 1974 (Survey Research
Center & Davis et al 1981), and political activists involved in nonelectoral
activity rose from 5-12% in the 1950s to 15-20% in the late 1960s and early
1970s (Campbell et al 1960:51-2; Converse 1972:332-6; Rosenau 1974:44-
86; Milbrath & Goel 1977:18-19). Simultaneously, mobilization for routine
politics declined as voter turnout slowly declined, partisan independence
rose, and general distrust of elected officials and major institutions
260
240
220
200
180
160
140
1 20
1 00 Demonstrat ions-:
80
60 -Riots
40
20
.
kD tD tD s tD tD s s~D ~
a an m in th ts,
Figure I Demonstrations a
This content downloaded from 141.217.20.120 on Fri, 07 Feb 2020 05:11:46 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 141.217.20.120 on Fri, 07 Feb 2020 05:11:46 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
This content downloaded from 141.217.20.120 on Fri, 07 Feb 2020 05:11:46 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
,
PCS 2010, HIS 2520, PS 2830
Social Justice Activism Week 3
Collective Identity:
The Lesbian Feminist Movement encourages
women to engage in wide ranges of social and
political actions designed to challenge, influence
and take control of dominant systems.
Protesters with signs, Miss America protest, Atlantic City, 1968 (left: Carol Giardina)
1979 March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights
Mary Daly Author of ‘Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism
Angela Davis, Author, Educator, Activist, Black Panther Party Movement
Marsha P. Johnson Co-founder Street Transvestite Action
Revolutionaries (S.T.A.R)
“Women are not inherently passive or peaceful. We’re not inherently anything but human”.
~ Robin Morgan
“You cannot, you cannot use someone else’s fire. You can only use your own. And in order to do
that, you must first be willing to believe that you have it.”
~Audre Lorde
1979 March on Washington for Lesbian and Gay Rights
Protesters at Stonewall Stonewall Inn in New York’s Greenwich Village, June 28, 1969.
Frances E.W. Harper, Early Black Lesbian and Bisexual Writer
Lesbian Feminism is a cultural movement that was most vigorous during the 1960’s, 70’s, 80’s as well as presently.
The Lesbian feminist movement, a subset and collective Identity (sub-merged networks) of feminism that emerged in the mid-to-late 20th century in the conjunction of the women’s movement, the gay rights movement and the sexual revolution.
Lesbians played a prominent role in many new feminist organizations, helping to organize for equity:
• workplace • home • courts
The first wave of women’s movements came between 1840-1925. The main battles these women fought for were:
• right to vote • higher education • employment • right to own property after marriage
The second wave of women’s movements was between 1960-1995. Radical feminism: Also known as the women’s liberation movement.
Radical feminism:
Radical feminists believe that the oppression of women is the doorway to all other forms of oppression.
These members are very committed to equality and utilize many techniques to make their meetings equal for all those in attendance.
They wanted to raise attention about the oppression of women and to demand changes in where women distinctly stand in society and also in relationships.
The third wave of women’s movements is still active today. It includes women of all backgrounds and economic situations.
Six features are a part of this wave: 1. Recognizing differences among women: Fight for the rights of all
women, women are not just one big group. Differences between women including sexual orientation, class, race, body shape, and ability.
2. Building coalitions: Other groups to work with in the fight for women’s rights. Alliances are built with men’s rights groups and other groups.
3. Engaging in everyday resistance: The second wave passed many laws giving rights to women and to people of other races. Laws are not being followed through upon on a personal level. People still make racist and sexist jokes on a daily basis. Third wave feminists challenge all sexist or racist jokes and comments.
4. Being media savvy: Third wave feminists are able to use media both to learn information about what is happening but also to spread their ideas.
5. Embracing aesthetics and consumerism: These feminists believe that women can be strong and be sexy at the same time. It is not inherently bad for women to buy fashionable clothes and look beautiful. They encourage women to explore their sexuality for themselves, not for others.
6. Individualism: Third wave feminists focus on individuals having their own goals and identities. Women are very diverse, not of a single political agenda.
• The lesbian feminist movement evolved as as social movement community (collective identity) at the national level through connections between local communities in decentralized and fragmented social structures.
• The lesbian feminist movement organized and mobilized through political actions to criticize homophobia within the women's movement as their platform and cultivated political strategies as a form of resistance.
Two types of participatory social movement organizations (SMO’s) are:
• Mass protest organizations – advocate for social change through protest and demonstration.
• Grassroots organizations – tend to work through existing political structures to promote social change
Not all grassroots radicals are the same. The radicals according to Della and Porta’s research account evolved into the more militant type.
• This is due in part to the way radicals are in contact with law enforcement as well as their ability to build trust among tightly knit groups. This is only one type of radical.
Here, we’ll identify four types of radicals or routes that activists can take as they
expand into radicals.
Opportunistic Radicals:
Are opportunistic due to the fact that their activities are constrained in terms of what they can accomplish by themselves and tend to steer clear of violent forms of activism.
Coordinated Radicals:
Are identified by close associational ties and the support facilitative of high- risk activism, as well as by a rational approach towards violence and unlawfulness.
Militant Radicals:
Are like the coordinated radicals, are able to form tight knit affinity groups, their embrace of more extremist approaches often puts them at odds with their less radical peers.
Loner Radicals:
Are loners, or lone-wolf radical. Loners, like the opportunistic radicals are unable to find an affinity group.
Like the militants, they share the impression that they are hunted and oppressed bylaw enforcement, and that extreme methods are the best solution.
Key Concepts to note from Week 3 textbook readings, Lesbian Feminist Movement in Frontier’s in Social Movement Theory
• Collective Identity (Identity-Oriented Paradigms)
• Consciousness (cognitive frameworks)
• Collective Identity (sub-merged networks)
• Boundaries (dominant groups social, cultural, economic, political, multiple systems of domination)
• Collective Identity (Negotiation, personal transformation, expressive action )
• Resource Mobilization (Collective Identity, Collective Action, Collective Behavior)
Key Concepts to note from Week 3 textbook readings, Cycles of Protests Frontier’s in Social Movement Theory
• Cycle of Protests (Temporal, Clusters, Spatial, Emergent)
• Social Movement Organizations (SMO’s)
• Master Frames (frame alignment, frame resonance)
• Collective Action Frames (injustice, problems/issues exposed, immoral, signaling)
• Dynamics of the Cycle of Protest (Tactical, Shape, Decline)
Key Concepts to note from Week 3 textbook readings, Collective Identity and Activism Frontier’s in Social Movement Theory
• Structural and Network Activism
• Rational Choice Theory of Collective Action
• Rational Actors
• Free-Riders
• Three Stages of Development of Social Movements: Participation (Networks, Existing and New Members and Collective Identity)
Class,
Please read all textbook assign reading for this week, watch all of the video clips/documentaries and read supplemental articles, specifically:
Women's Culture and Lesbian Feminist Activism- A Reconsideration of Cultural Feminism Author(s)- Verta Taylor and Leila J. Rupp.pdf
Week 3 Discussion Questions: Class,
In material’s covered in Week 3, all textbook readings assignments to date. Remember, this includes all film/documentaries and video clips. You will not be to successfully participate in the class discussion board forum without reviewing all of the textbook readings and supplemental reading located in Week 3 content module.
1. Please identify what wave(s) of feminism (lesbian or not) that appeared in the documentary, “BBC Documentary Women’s Liberation Movement”. Did you notice any overlapping waves? If so, please provide an example of what you noticed.
2. In the journal article, Women's Culture and Lesbian Feminist Activism- A Reconsideration of Cultural Feminism Author(s) – Verta Taylor and Leila J. Rupp, what underlying theme of collective action was prevalent in comparison to the brief videos, “Gay Rights March Part 1-3 and Stonewall 40 years Later”.
Week 3 Discussion Questions continued:
3. Please identify one of the four types of radicals or routes that social activists took that expanded in to radical(s) from a historical perspective in the video, “The Lesbian and Feminist Movements and the article, “The waves of feminism, and why people keep fighting over them, explained” and “BBC Documentary Women’s Liberation Movement”. Please provide one example of each of the above videos in your response.
Please note: I’m looking for your varying perspectives and not just (1) one in your critical analysis discussion board forum response and also to your fellow classmates responses.
End of Slides Only Presentation
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.