The purpose of these recap discussion boards is to create dialogue and analytical discourse about the material covered in
The purpose of these recap discussion boards is to create dialogue and analytical discourse about the material covered in the chapter. In answering the recap discussion questions, you should engage in meaningful discussion with your fellow classmates as well. Your responses, your initial post and your secondary posts, should be about a paragraph (5-7 sentences) in length. Please make sure to pay close attention to the specific due dates for each discussion board. You can contact me directly if you have any questions and please make sure to review the discussion board rubric under 'Course Resources'.
Due Dates:
**Initial post due 2/25
Please respond to the following questions with at least 5-7 sentence paragraph responses per question.
**Secondary posts due 2/27
You should respond to at least two of your classmates post by the above due date. Your responses should be substantial, meaning they should be about 5-7 sentences in length and relate to your classmates post in some way. Please review the discussion board rubric on the course site for an elaboration on the grading criteria.
Question:
- How do you feel about cultural appropriation? How might cultural appropriation be viewed as a negative social phenomenon? As a positive social phenomenon? From a sociological point of view, what are some issues with cultural appropriation? (give at least two examples and include some concepts from the chapter to strengthen your argument)
Guidelines and Rubric for Online Discussion Boards
In this class, online discussions will count towards your Participation and attendance grade in the course (see syllabus). The purpose of the discussion board is to frame and promote collaborative learning. Active and regular participation is not only important for me to see, but also important for you in learning the course content and in developing your thoughts and positions on various topics.
The three cardinal rules for Discussion Boards:
1. Please remember that the cultural of mutual respect that is part of this course extends into the virtual classroom environment.
2. Participation in these discussion boards is required.
3. Participation alone is not enough; a thoughtful and meaningful approach in your posts is required. (Quality counts!)
The total of your participation in a single discussion board question (topic) will be graded on a ten point scale.
Here is the protocol for posting and contributing to an online discussion:
a. You are expected to participate on at least 2 different days. |
b. You should begin at least one thread and provide at least two posts in response to other participants’ threads. |
c. Posting should be a minimum of one short paragraph. Word totals for each post should be in the 100-300 words range. Whether you agree or disagree explain why with supporting evidence and concepts from the readings or a related experience. |
d. Be organized in your thoughts and ideas. |
e. Incorporate correlations with the assigned readings or topics. |
f. Stay on topic. |
g. Provide evidence of critical, college-level thinking and thoughtfulness in your responses or interactions. Avoid summarizing. |
h. Contribute to the learning community by being creative in your approaches to topics, being relevant in the presented viewpoints, and attempting to motivate the discussion. |
i. Be aware of grammar and sentence mechanics. |
j. Use proper etiquette. Remember that being respectful is critical. |
Discussion Rubric:
Participating is measured by posting on 2 different days. You should make a minimum of 3 postings in total: one new thread and two thoughtful responses to different members. Your participation will be graded on a ten point scale as follows.
A Discussion (9-10 points) – participated 3 times, minimum of 3 posts
A-level postings:
· Are made in a timely fashion, giving others an opportunity to respond.
· Are thoughtful and analyze the content or question asked.
· Make connections to the course content and/or other experiences.
· Extend discussions already taking place or pose new possibilities or opinions not previously voiced.
· Are from participants aware of the needs of the community, motivate group discussion, and present a creative approach to the topic.
*If these criteria are met but the 100 word count is not met, the score will drop one point.
B Discussion (8-9 points) – participated 2 times, minimum of 2 posts
B-level postings:
· Are made in a timely fashion, giving others an opportunity to respond.
· Are thoughtful and analyze the content or question asked.
· Make connections to the course content and/or other experiences, but connections are unclear, not firmly established or are not obvious.
· Contain novel ideas, connections, and/or real-world application but lack depth, detail and/or explanation.
· Are from participants who interact freely and occasionally attempt to motivate discussion.
*If these criteria are met but the 100-200 word count is not met, the score will drop one point.
C Discussion (5-8 points) – participated 2 time, minimum of 2 posts
C-level postings:
· Are usually, but not always, made in a timely fashion.
· Are generally accurate, but the information delivered is limited.
· Make vague or incomplete connections between class content and posting by other students.
· Summarize what other students have posted and contain few novel ideas.
· Show marginal effort to become involved with group.
*If these criteria are met but the 100-200 word count is not met, the score will drop two points.
D Discussion (1-4 points) – participated 1 time, minimum 1 posts
D level postings:
· Are not made in timely fashion, if at all.
· Are superficial, lacking in analysis or critique.
· Contribute few novel ideas, connections, or applications.
· Show little effort to participate in learning community as it develops.
*If these criteria are met but the 100-200 word count is not met, the score will drop 1 point.
F Discussion (0 points).
· Participant was rude or abusive to other course participants. In this case, the number and quality of other posts is irrelevant.
OR
· Participant failed to meet the basic criteria for the “D Discussion”.
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.