This Session Evaluation Assignment is designed to give you the opportunity to review a video? recorded session as an observe
Brief Therapy for Addictions, 6, Motivational Interviewing Video (start at 20:35) I can't find the hole video only half of the video on YouTube
SESSION EVALUATION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
OVERVIEW
This Session Evaluation Assignment is designed to give you the opportunity to review a video
recorded session as an observer and assess the counselor’s verbal and non-verbal interactions
with his client. You will then take that information and respond to the Session Evaluation
Assignment with feedback on the session as well as what they may do differently and why. The
Session Evaluation Assignment will conclude with you completing an evaluation on the
counselor in the video.
INSTRUCTIONS
For this Session Evaluation Assignment, you will evaluate a session during which William R.
Miller is meeting with his client "Mike." You will be listening for things you felt Miller did well
and things he may have said that you would not recommend. It is suggested that you take notes
as you listen to the session as you will need to select 5 statements that you would have changed,
followed by a list of what you would have said instead and what counseling skills you would be
using in those altered statements. Lastly, you will be completing a Core Counseling Skills (CCS)
evaluation on Miller’s work in the 2nd part of the Session Evaluation Assignment. Please note
that you must have supporting explanations for the ratings that you choose to assign.
As this Session Evaluation Assignment uses a template, no page number is required, but
be sure to answer each question fully and with the details requested
Please use APA formatting for any citations or support you choose to include
No specific number of citations are required, but you must include support where the
assignment identifies it is necessary
Sources will include the video session and any text support you may choose to include
for your rationale regarding the counselor’s work
Please review the template for this Session Evaluation Assignment prior to viewing the video
session. This should help you to prepare for what information you will be asked to report on as
well as how to assess the counselor’s overall work and use of core counseling skills
ADCN 505
Session Evaluation Template
Watch this video of William R. Miller and “Mike”, using the OARS form to track counts and take notes on the session. Note 5 different places where you would have said or done something different. Below, you will answer the following questions. Afterwards, complete the Counseling Competencies Scale and the Counselor IM ratings.
1.) What things did Miller do well? These can be related to session content, process, or a particular skill (see ratings rubric in the following pages regarding skills areas).
2.) Share the areas where you felt Miller “got stuck” or struggled. These can be related to session content, process, or a particular skill (see ratings in the following pages). List the 5 statements Miller made that you would have done something differently. Include the time (e.g. 20:20) when the statement was made.
3.) What would you do/say differently in the 5 instances you list? Provide details for the specific type of skill you would be using, as well as why you would use that skill at that particular instance. Provide course material support for why that particular skill may be better suited at that particular time.
4.) Please rate the session using the Counseling Competencies Scale on the next pages as well as the Counselor IM ratings as well. For each rating, please identify why you are providing the particular rating, with supporting examples from the video.
Counseling Competencies Scale (CCS)
(Lambie, Mullen, & Swank, & Blount, 2014) with minor adaptations
The Counselor Competencies Scale—Revised (CCS-R) assesses counselors’ and trainees’ skills development and professional competencies. Additionally, the CCS-R provides counselors and trainees with direct feedback regarding their demonstrated ability to apply counseling skills and facilitate therapeutic conditions, and their counseling dispositions (dominant qualities) and behaviors, offering the counselors and trainees practical areas for improvement to support their development as effective and ethical professional counselors.
Scales Evaluation Guidelines
· Exceeds Expectations / Demonstrates Competencies (5) = the counselor or trainee demonstrates strong (i.e., exceeding the expectations of a beginning professional counselor) knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the specified counseling skill(s), ability to facilitate therapeutic conditions, and professional disposition and behavior(s).
· Meets Expectations / Demonstrates Competencies (4) = the counselor or trainee demonstrates consistent and proficient knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the specified counseling skill(s), ability to facilitate therapeutic conditions, and professional disposition(s) and behavior(s). A beginning professional counselor should be at this level at the conclusion of his or her practicum and/or internship.
· Near Expectations / Developing towards Competencies (3) = the counselor or trainee demonstrates sometimes inconsistent and limited knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the specified counseling skill(s), ability to facilitate therapeutic conditions, and professional disposition(s) and behavior(s). This is an acceptable skills level for a beginning counseling student in COUN 505.
· Below Expectations / Insufficient / Unacceptable (2) = the counselor or trainee demonstrates limited or no evidence of the knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the specified counseling skill(s), ability to facilitate therapeutic conditions, and professional disposition(s) and behavior(s).
· Harmful (1) = the counselor or trainee demonstrates harmful use of knowledge, skills, and dispositions in the specified counseling skill(s), ability to facilitate therapeutic conditions, and professional disposition(s) and behavior(s).
Directions: Please evaluate your counseling skills and ability to facilitate therapeutic conditions per rubric evaluation descriptions & record rating in the “score” column on the left.
Part I (Other parts will be completed in other classes): Counseling Skills & Therapeutic Conditions
# |
Score |
Primary Counseling Skill(s) |
Specific Counseling Descriptors |
Exceeds Expectations / Demonstrates Competencies (5) |
Meets Expectations / Demonstrates Competencies (4) |
Near Expectations / Developing towards Competencies (3) |
Below Expectations / Unacceptable (2) |
Harmful (1) |
1.A |
Nonverbal Skills |
Includes Body Position, Eye Contact, Posture, Distance from Client, Voice Tone, Rate of Speech, Use of silence, etc. (matches client) |
Demonstrates effective nonverbal communication skills, conveying connectedness & empathy (85%). |
Demonstrates effective nonverbal communication skills for the majority of counseling sessions (70%) |
Demonstrates some inconsistency in his or her nonverbal communication skills. |
Demonstrates limited nonverbal communication skills. |
Ignores client &/or gives judgmental looks. |
|
1.B |
Encouragers |
Includes Minimal Encouragers & Door Openers such as “Tell me more about…”, “Hmm” |
Demonstrates appropriate use of encouragers, which supports development of a therapeutic relationship (85%). |
Demonstrates appropriate use of encouragers for the majority of counseling sessions, which supports development of a therapeutic relationship (70%) |
Demonstrates some inconsistency in his or her use of appropriate encouragers. |
Demonstrates limited ability to use appropriate encouragers. |
Uses skills in a judgmental manner. |
|
1.C |
Questions |
Use of Appropriate Open & Closed Questioning (e.g., avoidance of double questions)
|
Demonstrates appropriate use of open & close-ended questions, with an emphasis on open-ended question (85%). |
Demonstrates appropriate use of open & close-ended questions for the majority of counseling sessions (70%). |
Demonstrates some inconsistency in using open-ended questions & may use closed questions for prolonged periods. |
Uses open-ended questions sparingly & with limited effectiveness. |
Uses multiple questions at one time |
|
1.D |
Reflecting a Paraphrasing |
Basic Reflection of Content – Paraphrasing |
Demonstrates appropriate use of paraphrasing as a primary therapeutic approach (85%). |
Demonstrates appropriate use of paraphrasing (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Demonstrates paraphrasing somewhat inconsistently & inaccurately or sometimes mechanical or parroted responses. |
Demonstrates limited proficiency in paraphrasing or is often inaccurate. |
Judgmental, dismissing, &/or overshoots |
|
1.E |
Reflecting b Affect |
Reflection of Feelings |
Demonstrates appropriate use of reflection of feelings as a primary approach (85%). |
Demonstrates appropriate use of reflection of feelings (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Demonstrates reflection of feelings somewhat inconsistently & sometimes is not matching the client. |
Demonstrates limited proficiency in reflecting feelings &/or is often inaccurate. |
Judgmental, dismissing, &/or overshoots |
|
1.F |
Reflecting c Summarizing |
Summarizing content, feelings, behaviors, & future plans |
Demonstrates consistent ability to use summarization to include content, feelings, behaviors, and future plans (85%). |
Demonstrates ability to appropriately use summarization to include content, feelings, behaviors, and future plans (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent & inaccurate ability to use summarization. |
Demonstrates limited ability to use summarization. |
Judgmental, dismissing, &/or overshoots |
|
1. G |
Advanced Reflection (Meaning) |
Advanced Reflection of Meaning including Values and Core Beliefs (taking counseling to a deeper level) |
Demonstrates consistent use of advanced reflection & promotes discussions of greater depth during counseling sessions (85%). |
Demonstrates ability to appropriately use advanced reflection, supporting increased exploration in session (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent & inaccurate ability to use advanced reflection. Counseling sessions may appear superficial at times. |
Demonstrates limited ability to use advanced reflection &/or switches topics in counseling often. |
Judgmental, dismissing, &/or overshoots |
|
# |
Score |
Primary Counseling Skill(s) |
Specific Counseling Descriptors |
Exceeds Expectations / Demonstrates Competencies (5) |
Meets Expectations / Demonstrates Competencies (4) |
Near Expectations / Developing towards Competencies (3) |
Below Expectations / Unacceptable (2) |
Harmful (1) |
1.H |
Confrontation |
Counselor challenges client to recognize & evaluate inconsistencies. |
Demonstrates the ability to challenge clients through verbalizing inconsistencies & discrepancies in the client’s words &/or actions in a supportive fashion. Balance of challenge & support (85%). |
Demonstrates the ability to challenge clients through verbalizing inconsistencies & discrepancies in the client’s words &/or actions in a supportive fashion (can confront, but hesitant) or was not needed and therefore appropriately not used (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent ability to challenge clients through verbalizing inconsistencies & discrepancies in client’s words &/or actions in a supportive fashion. Used minimally/missed opportunity. |
Demonstrates limited ability to challenge clients through verbalizing discrepancies in the client’s words &/or actions in a supportive & caring fashion, &/or skill is lacking. |
Degrading client, harsh, judgmental, &/or being aggressive |
|
1. I |
Goal Setting |
Counselor collaborates with client to establish realistic, appropriate, & attainable therapeutic goals |
Demonstrates consistent ability to establish collaborative & appropriate therapeutic goals with client (85%). |
Demonstrates ability to establish collaborative & appropriate therapeutic goals with client (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent ability to establish collaborative & appropriate therapeutic goals with client. |
Demonstrates limited ability to establish collaborative, appropriate therapeutic goals with client. |
No therapeutic goals collaboratively established |
|
1. J |
Focus of Counseling |
Counselor focuses (or refocuses) client on his or her therapeutic goals – i.e., purposeful counseling |
Demonstrates consistent ability to focus &/or refocus counseling on client’s goal attainment (85%). |
Demonstrates ability to focus &/or refocus counseling on client’s goal attainment (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent ability to focus &/or refocus counseling on client’s therapeutic goal attainment. |
Demonstrates limited ability to focus &/or refocus counseling on client’s therapeutic goal attainment. |
Superficial, &/or moves focus away from client |
|
1.K |
Facilitate Therapeutic Environment a |
Expresses accurate empathy & care. Counselor is “present” and open to client. (includes immediacy and concreteness) |
Demonstrates consistent ability to be empathic & uses appropriate responses (85%). |
Demonstrates ability to be empathic & uses appropriate responses (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent ability to be empathic &/or use appropriate responses. |
Demonstrates limited ability to be empathic &/or uses appropriate responses. |
Creates unsafe space for client |
|
1.L |
Facilitate Therapeutic Environment b |
Counselor expresses appropriate respect & unconditional positive regard |
Demonstrates consistent ability to be respectful, accepting, & caring with clients (85%). |
Demonstrates ability to be respectful, accepting, & caring with clients (majority of counseling sessions; 70%). |
Sometimes demonstrates inconsistent ability to be respectful, accepting, & caring. |
Demonstrates limited ability to be respectful, accepting, &/or caring. |
Demonstrates conditional or negative respect for client |
_______: Total Score (out of a possible 60 points)
Rate Counselor MI
Cultivating Change Talk |
||||
Low |
High |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Clinician shows no explicit attention to, or preference for, the client’s language in favor of changing |
Clinician sporadically attends to client language in favor of change – frequently misses opportunities to encourage change talk |
Clinician often attends to the client’s language in favor of change, but misses some opportunities to encourage change talk |
Clinician consistently attends to the client’s language about change and makes efforts to encourage it |
Clinician shows a marked and consistent effort to increase the depth, strength, or momentum of the client’s language in favor of change |
Comments:
Softening Sustain Talk |
||||
Low |
High |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Clinician consistently responds to the client’s language in a manner that facilitates the frequency or depth of arguments in favor of the status quo. |
Clinician usually chooses to explore, focus on, or respond to the client’s language in favor of the status quo. |
Clinician gives preference to the client’s language in favor of the status quo, but may show some instances of shifting the focus away from sustain talk. |
Clinician typically avoids an emphasis on client language favoring the status quo. |
Clinician shows a marked and consistent effort to decrease the depth, strength, or momentum of the client’s language in favor of the status quo. |
Comments:
Partnership |
||||
Low |
High |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Clinician actively assumes the expert role for the majority of the interaction with the client. Collaboration or partnership is absent. |
Clinician superficially responds to opportunities to collaborate. |
Clinician incorporates client’s contributions but does so in a lukewarm or erratic fashion. |
Clinician fosters collaboration and power sharing so that client’s contributions impact the session in ways that they otherwise would not. |
Clinician actively fosters and encourages power sharing in the interaction in such a way that client’s contributions substantially influence the nature of the session. |
Comments:
Empathy |
||||
Low |
High |
|||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
Clinician gives little or no attention to the client’s perspective. |
Clinician makes sporadic efforts to explore the client’s perspective. Clinician’s understanding may be inaccurate or may detract from the client’s true meaning. |
Clinician is actively trying to understand the client’s perspective, with modest success. |
Clinician makes active and repeated efforts to understand the client’s point of view. Shows evidence of accurate understanding of the client’s worldview, although mostly limited to explicit content. |
Clinician shows evidence of deep understanding of client’s point of view, not just for what has been explicitly stated but what the client means but has not yet said. |
Comments:
Page 2 of 2
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.