Explain sources of structural, economic, and health inequalities among older people in the United States.

Grading Rubric: Maximum 100 Points

Grading Criteria Points

Deliverable requirements addressed; understanding of material and presenter’s message and intent are clear 40 points Followed assignment guidelines and criteria 20 pts Yes/Complete Mostly Not at all

Overall quality 20 pts Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Scholarly research that supports the presenter’s position is properly acknowledged and cited, and direct quotations do not exceed 10% of the word count of the body of the assignment deliverable 25 points Title slide, agenda, tables, exhibits, appendices or reference slides included 12.5 pts Yes Partially Not at all

Content is original with less than 35% match 12.5 pts Yes 36–50% 51% or over

Critical thinking: Position is well-justified; logical flow; examples 10 points Position is justified with examples 5 pts Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Presentation flows logically 5 pts Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Structure: Includes introduction and conclusion slides, proper slide formatting, and reads as a polished, academic or professional presentation, as appropriate for the required assignment deliverable 7.5 points Includes introduction and conclusion slides 2.5 pts Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Slides are formatted properly with 5 lines of text 2.5 pts Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Reads as polished academic or professional presentation 2.5 pts Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement

Mechanical: No spelling, grammatical, or punctuation errors 10 points Spelling and grammar are accurate 5 pts Yes Partially Not at all

Punctuation is accurate 5 pts Yes Partially Not at all

APA: Deliverable is cited properly according to the APA Publication Manual 7.5 points References are cited in accordance with APA formatting 5 pts Yes Partially Not at all

Reference slide is included 2.5 pts Yes Partially Not at all