nication Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed Few or no credible sources are cited Points Range: 0 (0%) – 4 (4%) Responses posted in the discussion lack effective Response to faculty questions are missing No credible sources are cited First Response: Timely and full participation Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Meets requirements for timely and full participation posts by due date Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) NA Points Range: 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Does not meet requirement for full participation Second Response: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources. Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives Points Range: 8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%) Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings Points Range: 7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%) Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting Points Range: 6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%) Response is on topic
Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →lacks depth
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues
Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed
Provides clear
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds
Your pal for every paper is one click away
Join 12,000+ students getting original, on-time papers with free Turnitin reports.
All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions
College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018