Create a PowerPoint presentation comparing the United States and four other countries regulations concerning pharmaceuticals. Choose a specific law concerning the sale and distribution of prescription medication.
Your presentation should address the following substantive requirements:
Name and description of the agency involved in regulating prescription medications. For example, in the United States, this would be the Food and Drug Administration.
The actual law to which you are referring.
Price transparency and caps on expenses.
Analysis of the impact of the regulation on cost control and safety.
Assess any ethical implications for each countrys particular law.
Your presentation should meet the following structural requirements:
Be 6-7 slides in length, not including the cover or reference slides.
Be formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA Requirements.
Provide support for your statements with in-text citations from a minimum of three (3) scholarly articles beyond the text or assigned readings. The CSU-Global Library is a good place to find these references.
Presentation notes are required for each slide to support the slide content. These must be a part of the presentation, and so the presentation cannot be submitted in PDF format, which does not make notes visible to the instructor.
Utilize the following headings to organize the content in your work:
Assessment,
Recommendations, and
Conclusion.
HCM515 Mod02 CT
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements
|
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment, including a description of the agency, the law, and price transparency on expense.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
|
25 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the pharmaceutical laws; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.
|
10 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis
|
25 to >20.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides a strong critical analysis and interpretation based on the information given; shows strong critical thinking in assessing and evaluating regarding ethical implications for each country’s law and the impact of regulation on cost control and safety.
|
20 to >15.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Some significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
15 to >10.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.
|
10 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.
|
|
25 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources / Examples
|
20 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Cites and integrates at least 3 credible sources as specified in description.
|
16 to >12.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria but are lessthan adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
12 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.
|
8 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.
|
|
20 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Project is poorly organized and does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.
|
|
10 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style
|
10 to >8.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than one significant error.
|
8 to >6.0 pts
Approaches Expectation
Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with no more than two to three significant errors.
|
6 to >4.0 pts
Below Expectation
Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with four to five significant errors.
|
4 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU Global Writing Center, with more than five significant errors.
|
|
10 pts
|
|
Total Points: 110
|
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
