The attached document has Below a fictional story. At the end of the prompt, you will be asked to respond to

The attached document has Below a fictional story. At the end of the prompt, you will be asked to respond to various questions regarding constitutional issues that arise given the facts of the story. Thus, your task is to demonstrate your understanding of how the Constitution would likely be applied by the US Supreme Court if the facts in the story were real. Of course, it would be impossible to include all facts from a given complex social situation in a short exam like this. However, I have given you sufficient facts for you to you to answer all exam questions. No additional facts are needed.  

Citation is required. 

You may use bullet points, headings, sub-headings, paragraph form, etc., and organization your responses according to your preference.

Sources that might be useful:

Modes of Constitutional interpretation: https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R45129/3

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)

Marbury v. Madison | Oyez (Links to an external site.)

Marbury vs Madison (umkc.edu) (Links to an external site.)

Marbury v. Madison | Case Brief for Law Students (casebriefs.com)

McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 US 316 (1819)

McCulloch v. Maryland | Oyez (Links to an external site.)

McCULLOCH v. STATE, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) (umkc.edu) (Links to an external site.)

McCulloch v. Maryland | Case Brief for Law Students (casebriefs.com)

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 US 579 (1952)

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer | Oyez (Links to an external site.)

YOUNGSTOWN CO. v. SAWYER, 343 U.S. 579 (1952) (umkc.edu) (Links to an external site.)

Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer | Case Brief for Law Students (casebriefs.com)