NURS 6431 Week 1
NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion
NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion
NURS 6431: Evaluation Methods for Health Information Technology | Week 10
Every decision carries with it potential opportunities and potential costs. When a decision is made, some options (opportunities) are eliminated, whereas others are enabled. This concept is directly applicable to evaluation plans. The unique features of an evaluation plan promote some opportunities for future application or research and limit others. It is important to carefully consider both opportunities and limitations of a design while planning the evaluation to ensure that you are not limiting the project in unintended ways. NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion.
This week, you analyze an evaluation plan’s limitations and opportunities and develop strategies for minimizing unintended consequences. You also conclude your Evaluation Project by generating a presentation of your evaluation plan.
- Analyze an evaluation plan for limitations
- Analyze an evaluation plan for opportunities for further application
- Develop strategies for minimizing unintended consequences
- Synthesize elements of an evaluation plan
Discussion: Identification of Opportunities
and Limitations
Just as no two system implementations are the same, no two evaluation plans are, either. Every system implementation has unique attributes that require the development of a unique evaluation plan; however, nurse informaticists may be able to reuse parts of evaluation plans in similar practice settings or expanded research efforts. When considering existing evaluation plans for future use, it is important not to overlook a plan’s limitations. These limitations may lead to unintended consequences if they are not examined with a keen eye.
In this Discussion, you analyze the limitations of your evaluation plan and opportunities for future application. In addition, you develop strategies for minimizing unintended consequences resulting from your own evaluation plan.
To prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources, focusing on the limitations and opportunities highlighted in the research articles.
- Review your evaluation plan, assessing the possible limitations.
- Consider the plan’s contributions to your organization and to nursing as a whole. Assess future opportunities for building on this research. NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion.
- Research the Walden Library for an article detailing unintended consequences of an HIT implementation. Consider strategies for minimizing unintended consequences resulting from your evaluation plan.
By Day 3
Post a brief summary of the limitations of your evaluation plan. Also describe future opportunities that could build upon your evaluation plan. Summarize the article you identified that deals with unintended consequences, and outline strategies for avoiding unintended consequences stemming from your own evaluation plan. Include the reference in proper APA format.
By Day 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on two different days using one or more of the following approaches:
- Share an insight from having read your colleagues’ postings, synthesizing the information to provide new perspectives.
- Validate an idea with your own experience and additional research.
- Expand on your colleagues’ postings by providing additional insights or contrasting perspectives based on readings and evidence.
Note: You may choose to make changes to your evaluation plan based upon this week’s content.
The widespread adoption and use of Health Information Technology (HIT) in clinical environments has broadly corresponded with several reports of workflow and usability concerns and, in some cases, resulting in sentinel and adverse events. Recent reports from the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and other federal agencies have highlighted the crucial role of rigorous evaluation methods for the design and development of safer HIT.NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion. In this chapter, we describe various methods for evaluating HIT: the first section focuses on the usability methods related to the intrinsic aspects of human-computer interaction (HCI), both from an analytic and user-centered perspective; the second section focuses on the usability methods related to the external and situated aspects of human-computer interaction in complex clinical settings, both from a descriptive and contextual perspective of HIT use. Each of the evaluation methods is described with examples from recent empirical studies published in the biomedical informatics research. Finally, we conclude the chapter by highlighting the challenges of conducting HIT evaluation studies, and potential mechanisms for mitigating some of these methodological challenges. NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion.
Keywords
Evaluation methods Analytic techniques Usability Health IT
Additional Readings
-
Johnson, C. M., Johnston, D., & Crowle, P. K. (2011). EHR usability toolkit: A background report on usability and electronic health records. Rockville: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.Google Scholar
-
Kushniruk, A. W., & Patel, V. L. (2004). Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 37(1), 56–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
Preece, J., et al. (1994). Human-computer interaction. Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.Google Scholar
-
Shortliffe, E. H., & Patel, V. L. (2011). Generation and formulation of knowledge: Human-intensive techniques. In R. A. Greenes (Ed.), Clinical decision support: The road ahead. Academic.Google Scholar. NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion.
References
-
Aarts, J., Ash, J., & Berg, M. (2007). Extending the understanding of computerized physician order entry: Implications for professional collaboration, workflow and quality of care. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 76(Suppl 1), S4–S13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
-
Abraham, J. (2010). Meta-coordination activities: Exploring articulation work in hospitals, in information sciences and technology (IST). Doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar. NURS 6431 Week 10 Discussion
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
