There are two to five grammatical and spelling errors, and headings are only partially used.

Field Activity and Interview of a Emergency Nurse Practitioner

• Develop an interview guide with 6–8 questions that reflect the topics reviewed in this course, such as professional role theory, patient perceptions, professional and societal expectations, health policy, and reimbursement policies that affect the APRN role.

• Conduct an interview with an individual representing an advanced practice role. Report the interview findings in a 2-3 page report excluding cover page and reference page formatted using APA guidelines. The submission must include:

o Interview guide with 6–8 questions

 professional role theory

 patient perceptions

 professional expectations

 societal expectations

 health policy

 reimbursement policies that affect the APRN role

o An introduction

o A description of the interviewee’s current role, practice settings, and the educational path she/he traveled to reach their present position

o Answers to the following questions:

 Does the advanced practice nurse practice in a clinical, leadership, educational, research, or practice role, or a combination of these roles? In her/his present setting, is an advanced practice role accepted and respected? Provide an example.

 What barriers are experienced in her/his clinical practice area?

 What professional issues are of concern on the local, state, or national level?

o Summary/Conclusion

o A minimum of one reference, which may be included in the introduction and/or conclusion.

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS 660 Field Activity and Interview Rubric

Description: NURS 660 Field Activity and Interview Rubric

Grid View

List View

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Introduction/Topic–

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 19.92 (16.60%) – 24 (20.00%)

Identifies the correct APN to interview. Clearly identifies and describes the APN role selected and succinctly introduces the theme of the paper.

Emerging 18.24 (15.20%) – 19.68 (16.40%)

Identifies the correct APN to interview. Identifies the correct APN role, but provides a limited or unclear description of the APN role, or the theme of the paper is limited.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 18 (15.00%)

Does not select, identify, or describe an APN role. Does not introduce the theme of the paper.

Feedback:

Content–

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 29.88 (24.90%) – 36 (30.00%)

Content includes a clear description of the APN’s practice setting and role and responsibilities (clinical practice, leadership, research, or combination), educational pathway, and perceptions of role acceptance and respect with at least one coherent example provided, and any barriers experienced in the APN role. Identifies local, state, or national professional issues of concern clearly.

Emerging 27.36 (22.80%) – 29.52 (24.60%)

Content includes a limited description of the APN’s practice setting and role and responsibilities but does not include all of the required content criteria as outlined in the assignment.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 27 (22.50%)

Content does not include the APN’s practice setting, role and responsibilities, or any of the required content criteria as outlined in the assignment.

Feedback:

Writing/Organization/Cohesiveness–

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 29.88 (24.90%) – 36 (30.00%)

The paper flows logically and integrates source materials skillfully with no more than one grammatical or spelling error. Headings are utilized appropriately to delineate specific assignment requirements.

Emerging 27.36 (22.80%) – 29.52 (24.60%)

The paper follows a logical path, but lacks a cohesive integration of source materials or does not flow logically, but source materials are skillfully integrated. There are two to five grammatical and spelling errors, and headings are only partially used.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 27 (22.50%)

The paper does not flow logically, and the direction of the paper is unclear or confusing. Headings are not used. There are seven or more grammatical and spelling errors, and the writing lacks skill.

Feedback:

Conclusion–

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 14.94 (12.45%) – 18 (15.00%)

Clearly summarizes all of the important points of the paper and demonstrates a clear analysis and synthesis of the material.

Emerging 13.68 (11.40%) – 14.76 (12.30%)

Partially summarizes some of the important points of the paper and demonstrates a limited analysis and synthesis of the material.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 13.5 (11.25%)

The summary and analysis of the material are missing or are disconnected from the topic(s).

Feedback:

APA–

Levels of Achievement:

Accomplished 4.98 (4.15%) – 6 (5.00%)

Uses APA formatting and adheres to correct citation and reference standards with no errors. Contains the minimum of three required references.

Emerging 4.56 (3.80%) – 4.92 (4.10%)

Uses APA formatting and adheres to correct citation and reference standards with one to two errors, or contains less than the three required references.

Unsatisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 4.5 (3.75%)

APA formatting is not used and no reference material is cited.

Feedback: