Michael Bull makes the argument in his essay, ‘The Audio-Visual iPod’ that the iPod aesth
Michael Bull makes the argument in his essay, "The Audio-Visual iPod" that the iPod aestheticizes' the city and transforms the public experience of the street into a private one. Bull is quite critical of iPod use in the city, arguing that it 'distracts' and 'isolates' the user and he asks us to consider the moral consequences of iPod use.
What does it mean to 'share' public space with each other when we are sequestered into our own privatized and commoditized experiences? What does it mean for our ability to see and tolerate others in public space? As you have, most likely, had the experience of using an iPod (or similar device) in public, do you agree with Bull? specifically, what parts of his essay do you agree with? or do you disagree with him? if so, what parts of his argument do you disagree with? or maybe its a bit of both?
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
