Getting trained and immersed in ethics and governance scholarly litera

Getting trained and immersed in ethics and governance scholarly literature can be challenging, that students of this important subject need to understand, that to become future ethical business leaders and contributors. The purpose of this assignment is to build up your ability to bridge normative theories and scholarly readings.

From each of these readings, identify whether each uses Deontology, Teleology or Virtue ethics, or a combination to justify their approach. While it may seem like a challenging reading task, please remember, the use of these four readings actually makes your assignment easier.

Assignment 1 Readings

1Gupta R. 2019, Ethics and ethical dilemmas–a practical approach. Vinimaya. 2019; Vol: 40 No 1, pp. 5–19.2Hiekkataipale, M. and Lämsä, A.-M. (2017), “(A)moral agents in organisations? The significance of
ethical organisational culture for middle managers’ exercise of moral agency in ethical
problems”, Journal of Business Ethics Vol. 155, No. 1, 147–1613Reddy Y.R.K., 2009, The ethics of corporate governance An Asian perspective, International Journal of Law and Management, Vol. 51 No. 1, pp. 17-264Christensen, SL. and Kohls J, 2003, Ethical Decision Making in Times of Organizational Crisis A Framework for Analysis, Business & Society, Vol. 42 No. 3, 328-358.

Finding Additional Readings

This assignment offers you the opportunity to find additional scholarly literature that would help you to explain the different definitions of ethics theories, such as Kantian, Deontology, Teleology etc. Finding relevant scholarly literature will assist in helping you to come to valuable judgments as to why readings (1) to (4) may be demonstrative of one of these theories.Assignment 1 TemplateDownload this template for Assignment 1 to help you. The template has two columns in a table, use the right column to select paragraphs of text from the readings that are rich and meaningful and in the left column, analyse and use this to critically engage and explain your justification for the identification of theories.

Warning

This assignment can be challenging for students who may not be confident in constructing an argument – remember, we are not looking for memorised or cut and pasted answers, but how you justify critically your recognition of a particular theoretical influence. Use Turnitin to check, whether you are just citing verbatim, because we want you to develop your own critical judgement. 

Further advice

RMIT Harvard style referencing guide: (Links to an external site.)

RMIT Assessment Policy and Procedures

Information about the assessment policy and procedures at RMIT, including information on applying for special consideration and an extension for submitting an assessment task:

RMIT Assessment Policies and Guidelines (Links to an external site.)

 (Links to an external site.)RMIT policy outlining the minimum procedural standards for academic integrity and procedures for the management of plagiarism:

Academic integrity and plagiarism procedure (Links to an external site.)

The copyright service provides support to RMIT in improving copyright compliance. The focus of the service is the provision of advice and permission seeking in the use of copyright works within RMIT:

Copyright Management Services – Student Resources (Links to an external site.)

The following document is intended for RMIT Business TAFE and undergraduate students, it details how to format your written work and demonstrates:

• the differences between academic essays and business reports;
• guidelines for their preparation;
• how to ensure you meet the technical requirements;
• how to cite references; and
• how to avoid plagiarism.
•  2000 words maximum (+/- 10%)
  (exclusive of references, appendices etc.)