NR 503 Week 3: Discussion- Current Event

This week we will explore current events related to epidemiology. You will present a scientific article to the class. Please focus on interpreting the research question, methodology, results, and conclusions from a sample of peer-reviewed scientific literature. Please be sure the article is related to epidemiology, summarizing its contents for the class, and providing a succinct written summary. Current events must have been published within the last six months. Written summaries should include:

• State the objectives of the study
• Summarize the study design and findings
• Provide a reference of the article
• Provide your opinion on how the “average” reader will respond to the article. Will the article influence decision making or thinking? Does the article leave out any important information?

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL PAPER

Happy Monday

As future APNs, you will need to be able to identify best practices, which will include evaluating and incorporating published research into your practice.

I’ve listed below some guidelines that you may find useful when critiquing research studies.

Article Title

1. Is the title concisely stated?
2. Does the title convey the content of the study?
3. Introduction
4. Statement of the Problem
5. Is the problem significant?
6. Is the problem clearly and completely formulated?
7. Is the general scope of the study adequately presented?
8. Is the purpose of the study precisely stated?
9. Related Research
10. Is previous research related to the study presented?
11. Is the cited research relevant to the study presented?
12. Is a succinct and meaningful summary presented?
13. Hypotheses or Questions
14. Are the hypotheses to be tested or the questions to be answered clearly stated?
15. Assumptions and Delimitations
16. Are the assumptions underlying the study made explicit?
17. Are these assumptions reasonable?
18. Operational Definitions
19. Are essential concepts or terms clearly defined or explained?
20. Are the definitions or explanations meaningful?
21. Method
22. Population and Sample
23. Are the characteristics of the selected population and sample (size, source, nature, etc.) fully presented?

• Is the sampling method indicated?

1. Research, Instruments and/or Apparatus
2. Are the techniques employed (e.g. interview, questionnaire, apparatus, tests, etc.) clearly and fully described?
3. Are the instruments or techniques appropriate for collecting the data?
4. If tests were used, what evidence is presented regarding their rationale, reliability, and validity?
5. Procedure
6. Is the design or procedure clearly and fully reported?
7. Are appropriate statistical methods used in analyzing the data?
8. Can the study be replicated?

III. Results and Conclusions 

7. Are the findings intelligibly reported in textual presentation?
8. Are the conclusions logically drawn (i.e. based on the data presented)?
9. Are tables and figures used appropriately?
10. Discussion
11. Are the findings discussed adequately and meaningfully?
12. Does the investigator indicate the possible implications of the study?
13. Are these implications meaningful?
14. Are limitations of the study recognized?
15. What are some other limitations that were not mentioned?
16. Are any suggestions offered regarding avenues for further research?
17. Are these suggestions worthwhile?
18. Summary
19. Are the problem and methodology restated?
20. Are the major findings, generalizations, implications, and limitations succinctly

synthesized?

Communication 

19. Is the report well organized?
20. Is the report well written?

Here’s a link to a good guidance document for critiquing research-

http://www.flinders.edu.au/slc_files/Documents/Blue%20Guides/Critiquing%20Research%20Articles.pdf Links to an external site.

NR 503 Week 3: Discussion- Current Event SAMPLE INTRO

I found an interesting current event article about a recent outbreak of measles in Japan. Japan has been improving vaccination rates among children, and in 2015, the World Health Organization (WHO) thought that measles was eliminated in the country (Mizumoto, Kobayashi, & Chowell, 2018). After a foreign traveler came to visit, ninety-nine new cases of measles were discovered from March to May 2018, the number peaking around week fifteen (Mizumoto et al., 2018). Measles can appear in two forms. Classic measles presents with fever, maculopapular rash, rhinitis, cough, and conjunctivitis (Mizumoto et al., 2018). Those with modified measles usually do not report with the typical symptoms and is generally due to lower immunity or insufficient vaccines (Mizumoto et al., 2018).

The objective of the study was to determine vaccination status and compare with age and type of measles. Thirty-three percent of cases were modified measles, most of these being adults (Mizumoto et al., 2018). A real-time epidemiological analysis was conducted, looking at the type of measles, the age of the person affected, and their vaccination status (Mizumoto et al., 2018). Four were infants, twenty-four were between the ages of one to nineteen, and seventy-one were twenty and older (Mizumoto et al., 2018). Of the reported people, only thirty-two percent had been vaccinated, twenty with one dose, ten with two doses, and 2 with unknown doses (Mizumoto et al., 2018). Research shows that vaccinated cases appear to be less contagious compared to those that are unvaccinated (Mizumoto et al., 2018).

NR 503 Week 3: Discussion- Current Event SAMPLE RESPONSE

You did a good job with reviewing and summarizing the article. I read this article too when I tried to choose the topic. It seems like the authors used case-control study designs, not cohort design since the article attempts to understand the causation of disease in this study. According to the lesson from this week (CCN, 2018), a cohort study is observational which means it doesn’t involve specific intervention, treatment, or randomization. The study concluded the article that vaccinated cases appeared to be less contagious than unvaccinated cases with classic meals (Mizumoto, Kobayashi & Chowell, 2018). As a healthcare provider, we have to be up-to-date with the most current evidence to provide the best care. Thus, it’s important to be informed about this kind of outbreak since it’s closely related to the vaccination which can help to prevent and control outbreaks such as the one affecting Okinawa. Enjoyed reading your post. Thank you !

Chamberlain College of Nursing (CCN). Week 3: Lesson. Estimating Risk, Cohort Design, and Chronic Illness. Retrieved from (2018). https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/29191/pages/week-3-lesson?module_item_id=3556896

Mizumoto, K., Kobayashi, T., & Chowell, G. (2018). Transmission potential of modified measles during an outbreak, Japan, March‒May 2018. Euro Surveillance: Bulletin Europeen Sur Les Maladies Transmissibles = European Communicable Disease Bulletin, 23(24), doi:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.24.1800239

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.