NR 503 Week 1 Assignment
Week 1: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper
HealthyPeople 2020 goals
The National HIV/AIDS strategy has three primary goals: to reduce the number of new HIV infections, improve access to care and health outcomes for HIV patients, and minimize HIV-related health inequities (HealthyPeople.gov, 2018). Guidelines for screening and diagnosis of HIV include routine screening for pregnant women and the recommendation for anyone between ages 13 and 64 to get tested at least once a year (HealthyPeople.gov, 2018). There are three types of HIV tests: nucleic acid tests (NAT), antigen/antibody, and antibody (HealthyPeople.gov, 2018). If a test reads positive, the individual will be referred to a health care provider for follow-up testing (Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention et al., 2018)…..
This assignment was locked Jul 18 at 11:59pm.
The Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper must be submitted by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 1. The guidelines and grading rubric for this assignment are located in the Course resources section.
This assignment will follow the late assignment policy specified in the course syllabus.
Rubric
Week 1: Healthy People 2020 Impact Paper
NR503 Week 1 Healthy People 2020
| NR503 Week 1 Healthy People 2020 |
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction of the problem/concern |
| 10.0 pts
Exceptional- Comprehensively identifies the problem/concern.
|
9.0 pts
Exceeds- Adequately identifies the problem/concern.
|
8.0 pts
Meets- Identification of problem/concern is limited.
|
4.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Identification of problem/concern is unclear.
|
0.0 pts
Developing- Identification of problem/concern is absent.
|
|
10.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscussion of the problem |
| 20.0 pts
Exceptional- Background is complete, presents risks, disease impact and includes a review of incidence and prevalence of the disease within the student’s local area, state, and nationally. Evidence supports background.
|
18.0 pts
Exceeds- Background is complete, presents risk, disease impact and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented and supported by evidence.
|
16.0 pts
Meets- Background missing one or more key points and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented. Lack of evidence or limited presentation of the background.
|
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Background missing more than one key point and at least one set of incidence and prevalence statistics are presented, or there is no supported evidence. Unclear conclusions or presentation.
|
0.0 pts
Developing- Background and significance of the disease is not provided.
|
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentification of Epidemiological Data |
| 20.0 pts
Exceptional- Comprehensive review and analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and population most at risk, supported by scholarly evidence.
|
18.0 pts
Exceeds- Adequate review with some analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and population most at risk supported by scholarly evidence.
|
16.0 pts
Meets- Limited review and analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and at-risk population.
|
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Minimal analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and at-risk population.
|
0.0 pts
Developing- No analysis of key descriptive epidemiological points of the identified disease and at-risk population is provided.
|
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHealthy People 2020 Goals |
| 20.0 pts
Exceptional- Comprehensive review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
|
18.0 pts
Exceeds- Adequate review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
|
16.0 pts
Meets- Limited review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
|
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Minimal or unclear review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem.
|
0.0 pts
Developing- Review of Healthy People 2020 goals for problem not provided.
|
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProgram Plan |
| 20.0 pts
Exceptional- A comprehensive plan of action specific to the problem; including the actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease.
|
18.0 pts
Exceeds- An adequate, but not fully comprehensive, plan of action specific to the problem; including the actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease.
|
16.0 pts
Meets- A limited plan of action specific to the problem; including the actions that will be taken to address the impact, outcomes, or prevalence of the disease. The actions are presented with limited or little evidence.
|
8.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Actions are minimal or unclear, are not supported directly by evidence or are not actions specific to the problem.
|
0.0 pts
Developing- Plan of action not provided.
|
|
20.0 pts |
| This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format / Writing Mechanics |
| 10.0 pts
Exceptional- APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation are accurate, or with zero to one errors.
|
9.0 pts
Exceeds- Two to four errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
|
8.0 pts
Meets- Five to seven errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted.
|
4.0 pts
Needs Improvement- Eight to nine errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and syntax noted or the paper exceeds maximum of two (2) pages.
|
0.0 pts
Developing- Greater than ten errors in APA format, grammar, spelling, and/or punctuation noted or repeatedly makes the same errors after faculty feedback.
|
|
10.0 pts |
| Total Points: 100.0 |
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
