NRS 437V Week 4 Assignment

Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V

Details:

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment. Part ONE is an individual assignment that will also be used in Part TWO, the culminating paper.

For this individual Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V assignment, interview a hospital administrator, a spiritual leader, a health care colleague, or a neighbor/friend.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER

In your interview, ask about the individual’s philosophy and worldview in relation to the ethical dilemma of your choosing, which was:

[[      Dilemma 3: Voluntary/Assisted Euthanasia

Confronting Death: Who Chooses? Who Controls? A Dialogue between Dax Cowart and Robert Burt http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/706/

The Terry Schiavo Documentary http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cki55BM42kw ]]

Individually, you will need to interview all 4 (four) different individuals and perspectives to complete Part Three of the Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma assignment.

Make sure all roles are covered.

Craft a 250-500-word summary of the individual’s response, including the individual’s identified philosophy and worldview.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

Week 4 DQ 1

Does the principle of autonomy guarantee a person the right to do something that is harmful to oneself? To others? Explain your response with ethical rationale.

Week 4 DQ 2

• What is the difference between beneficence and nonmaleficence? Give examples of each from your clinical practice.

Week 5 DQ 1

• What is the ethical dilemma?
• What is your value and ethical position related to the case? Include discussion of theory and principles on which your position is based.
• What are some other alternatives for resolving the problem?
• What are the possible consequences for those acceptable alternatives?
• How would you prioritize the acceptable alternatives?
• What is your plan of action?

Week 5 DQ 1

Health care providers are obligated to provide for those entrusted in their care. To what extent do they meet this obligation? How might their obligation to others conflict with their obligation to themselves?

Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Two)

Details:

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part ONE), share your interview results. Consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words. Incorporate the research YOU HAVE done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your position and the rationale for your position.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V assignment to Turnitin.

NRS 437V Week 5 Assignment Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part Three)

This is a CLC assignment.

Refer to the “Collaborative Learning Community: Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma” resource for the dilemmas and resources that will be used for this multi-part assignment.

After completing the individual interviews (Part Two), share your interview results. As a group, consider the responses of the four types of individuals interviewed. Assess their similarities and differences.

Compose a written recommendation of 750-1,000 words. Incorporate the research your group has done as well as your interview results for the four types of individuals to come to a resolution to the ethical dilemma. Be sure to clearly articulate your group’s position and the rationale for your position.

Prepare this Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this Analysis of an Ethical Dilemma (Part One) NRS 437V assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.