(a) Has protection for proprietary software gone too far, as

(a) Has protection for proprietary software gone too far, as some critics suggest? (b) If not, why? (c) If so, what are the implications for innovation and competition in the computer industry? (d) How can we achieve an appropriate balance between those who hold legal rights to proprietary information and ordinary users who wish to access, share, and communicate that information? Defend your answer. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (knowledge)Back in chapter 5 privacy advocates argue for greater control of personal information by individuals, while many in the commercial sector argue for access to that information. It appears that these positions have reversed now in chapter 8—entrepreneurs argue for control of the flow of information on the Internet, while ordinary users argue for access to that information. (a) Is there an irony, perhaps even an inconsistency, here? (b) Can this inconsistency be resolved in a logically coherent manner? (c) Explain how. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)(a) What is meant by “information commons”? (b) How is this commons disappearing in the cyberage? (c) Mr. Boyle’s has suggested that a political movement, similar to the environmental movement in the 1970s, is needed to save the commons. Does his suggestion merit further consideration? Explain. Please elaborate (beyond a yes or no answer) and provide your “theoretical” rationale in support of your responses. (comprehension)