2 – 3 pages neededThe purpose of this assignment is to pro

2 – 3 pages neededThe purpose of this assignment is to provide you with competing perspectives on organizational change and challenge you to make arguments for and against those perspectives based on your readings and your personal experiences. Carefully read and review Applebaum et al.’s critique of Kotter’s 8-step approach to change. Upon analyzing and contrasting the two positions, make one argument supporting Kotter’s position and one argument supporting Applebaum’s critique.APA formatting, proper in-text citations, and references are required for each initial post. After your references, please attach PDF files or include permalinks to your articles.Link to videoMcKinsey 7S Framework Explainedhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DFNJypMOIMI&feature=youtu.beReadingsThe reading selected for this week will provide you with detailed information about the commonly used organizational management tools such as McKinsey’s 7-S model and Kotter’s 7-step approach. They will also provide you with insights as to why organizational change efforts often fail.Back to the Future: Revisiting Kotter’s 1996 Change Model (attached)Appelbaum, S.H., Habashy, S., Malo, J.L., & Shafiq, H. (2012).Back to the Future: Revisiting Kotter’s 1996 Change Model.Journal of Management Development, 31(8), 764-782.The Eigth ‘S’s of Successful Strategy Execution (attached) Higgins, J.M. (2005).The Eight ‘S’s of Successful Strategy Execution.Journal of Change Management, 5(1), 3-13.