Unit 5 Assignment – Preadmission ScreeningSubmit AssignmentDue Sunday by 11:59pm Points 70 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file uploadAfter reading Chapter 8, we will use the criteria from the case study on pages 157-1158. Review the criteria set in Table 8.4 (p. 157) and the history and physical report in Figure 8.5 (p. 158), and compare the patient’s history with the admission criteria to determine whether the patient meets criteria for admission to the hospital. To qualify, the patient must meet at least one criterion in the severity of illness and one criterion in the intensity of service.InstructionsIdentify at least one criterion in each of these categories (severity of illness and intensity of service).Explain why it meets the requirements for admission to the hospital.Then summarize why the preadmission screening process is an important component of the continuum of care. (NOTE: do not address the customer satisfaction questions in the case study “Project Application” section – we are only concerned with the admission criteria).Prepare an APA-style paper that includes the following elements:Introduction: Why do we need criteria to assess preadmission, care management and discharge processesBody: Identify the criteria that meet requirements for hospital admission (one from the severity of the illness category and one from the intensity of service category).Conclusion: Summarize why the preadmission process is so important, what negative outcomes can happen if patients are not appropriately screened? What are the implications for the hospital (financial or otherwise), for the patient?Minimum length of 2 pages excluding cover page and reference page.List your references in proper APA style, including the textbook.RubricUnit 5 Assignment – Preadmission ScreeningUnit 5 Assignment – Preadmission ScreeningCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTopic10.0 ptsLevel 5Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.9.0 ptsLevel 4Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.8.0 ptsLevel 3Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.7.0 ptsLevel 2Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.6.0 ptsLevel 1Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.0.0 ptsLevel 0Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeExisting Knowledge, Research, and/or Views10.0 ptsLevel 5Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).9.0 ptsLevel 4Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.8.0 ptsLevel 3Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.7.0 ptsLevel 2Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.6.0 ptsLevel 1Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.0.0 ptsLevel 0Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent10.0 ptsLevel 5Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.9.0 ptsLevel 4Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.8.0 ptsLevel 3Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.7.0 ptsLevel 2Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.6.0 ptsLevel 1Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is no evidence of a defined statement.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P10.0 ptsLevel 5Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.9.0 ptsLevel 4Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.8.0 ptsLevel 3Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.7.0 ptsLevel 2Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.6.0 ptsLevel 1Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.0.0 ptsLevel 0Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion10.0 ptsLevel 5Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.9.0 ptsLevel 4Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.8.0 ptsLevel 3Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.7.0 ptsLevel 2Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.6.0 ptsLevel 1States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.0.0 ptsLevel 0States an illogical conclusion from findings.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLimitations and Implications10.0 ptsLevel 5Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.9.0 ptsLevel 4Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.8.0 ptsLevel 3Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.7.0 ptsLevel 2Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.6.0 ptsLevel 1Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.0.0 ptsLevel 0Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.10.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting5.0 ptsLevel 5The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.4.5 ptsLevel 4The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.4.0 ptsLevel 3The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.3.5 ptsLevel 2The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.3.0 ptsLevel 1The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.0.0 ptsLevel 0The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.5.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I5.0 ptsLevel 5The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.4.5 ptsLevel 4The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.4.0 ptsLevel 3The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.5 ptsLevel 2The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.3.0 ptsLevel 1Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.0.0 ptsLevel 0There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.5.0 ptsTotal Points: 70.0PreviousNext
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we\'ll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.