it would be the same as the last one.Ethics Presenter(You wi

it would be the same as the last one.Ethics Presenter(You will do this twice.)This presentation is likely to be different fromothers you may have done. The questions you willbe addressing, while they may not be familiar onesin an engineering class, are fairly natural questionsfor people to ask. These are not the questionsabout what actually happened in the case (that isthe case presenters’ job). Rather, the questionsyou will investigate concern the values that were atwork behind the decisions of the engineers in thecase, whether you think these values were the rightones, and whether the case can help engineers tolearn how to be better ethical decision-makers.You will have 7 minutes to present your argument.Your argument must address these questions:* Which values (seem to have) guided theengineers in the case? What evidence is there tosupport the identification of these particular values?* Whose interests were being served or neglectedby the decisions and/or actions of the engineers inthe case?* Should we share the values of the engineers in thecase and/or their particular approach to achievingor futhering these values? Why or why not?* Were the decisions of the engineers in the casethe best they could have made, given what theyknew at the time? Did any non-engineers interferewith the decision-making of the engineers in thecase?* What can we learn from this case about how toresolve moral dilemmas that arise withinengineering work (i.e., the moral lessons of thecase)?Organize your answers into an argument aboutwhat should have happened—with emphasis uponthe decision-making of the engineers in yourcase—and run through a vocal delivery of theorganized material a few times before presenting tothe class. Your presentation should be a polishedand fluid piece of persuasion, and you should notneed to rely on your notes or visual aids whiledelivering your argument.