Five Forces Framework and Strategic Industry MapFor this ass

Five Forces Framework and Strategic Industry MapFor this assignment you will compare and contrast, as well as assess the usefulness of the Five Forces framework and the strategic industry map, which are frequently used by healthcare organizations in their strategic planning efforts. Your paper is expected to briefly describe each tool and explain how each is used in formulating strategy. In addition, you must describe the strengths, limitations, and challenges of each.The paper should be well-written and meet the following requirements:3-4 pages in length (excluding title and reference pages),Include at least three current references from peer-reviewed articles.RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRequirements15.0 to >12.0 ptsMeets ExpectationIncludes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.12.0 to >9.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationIncludes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.9.0 to >6.0 ptsBelow ExpectationIncludes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.6.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceIncludes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent25.0 to >20.0 ptsMeets ExpectationDemonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.20.0 to >15.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.15.0 to >10.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.10.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Analysis25.0 to >20.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProvides a strong critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.20.0 to >15.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationSome significant but not major errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.15.0 to >10.0 ptsBelow ExpectationMajor errors or omissions in analysis and interpretation.10.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceFails to provide critical analysis and interpretation of the information given.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDemonstrates proper use of APA style10.0 to >8.0 ptsMeets ExpectationProject contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.8.0 to >6.0 ptsApproaches ExpectationFew errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.6.0 to >4.0 ptsBelow ExpectationSignificant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.4.0 to >0 ptsLimited EvidenceNumerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.10.0 pts