Describe how data will be gathered Explains any test instruments

Describe how data will be gathered Explains any test instruments or questionnaito be used Describes the process of data analysis Shows how evaluation will be used for program improvements Describes any evaluation reports to be produced For tDiscussion, keep thevaluation criteria in mind as you review the two grant applications listed in the Learning Resources.?Project description Grant Proposals Proposals must include a plan for determining the degree to which objectives are met and methods are followed. Tsection is extremely important as funders pay particular attention to evaluation methods, since they nhelp determining whether a proposed project represents an intelligent investment for them. The evaluation section should meet the following criteria: Presents a plan for evaluating accomplishment of objectives Presents a plan for evaluating and modifying methods over the course of the program Explains who will be doing the evaluation and how they were chosen Clearly states evaluation criteria Describes how data will be gathered Explains any test instruments or questionnaito be used Describes the process of data analysis Shows how evaluation will be used for program improvements Describes any evaluation reports to be produced For tDiscussion, keep thevaluation criteria in mind as you review the two grant applications listed in the Learning Resources. Two applications were submitted. Only one can receive the grant funds. Based on the information you have available, and using the evaluation rubric for each grant application, determine which one of the grants you believe should receive funding. With ththoughts in mind: Post two reasons why you selected the grant that you choose to fund and two reasons why you chose not to fund the other grant. Then, briefly explain two grant-writing strategies that you might recommend to improve the unsuccessful proposal. Be sure to support your postings and responses with specific references to the Learning Resources Required readings and citations Institute of Medicine. (2003). Unequal treatment: Confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Washington, DC: National Academyof Sciences. Retrieved from the Walden Library databases. Chapter 2, The Healthcare Environment and Its Relation to Disparities Shining Beacon Community Services Center. (2001). Shining light: Anger management for women. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=331613513571494&id=260537440679102 HIV Awareness Project. (n.d.). HIV prevention and planning coalition. Retrieved from https://thegrantdoctor.com/samples/sample-proposal-aids-hiv-prevention-grant/Sample-Proposal-AIDS-HIV-Prevention2.html National Science Foundation. (n.d.). Grant proposal guide. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf11001/gpgprint.pdf Grant-Proposal GuideNSF 11-1 by The National Science Foundation. Honeycutt, A. A., Clayton, L., Khavjou, O., Finkelstein, E. A., Prabhu, M., Blitstein, J. LRenaud, J. M. (2006, March). Guide to analyzing the cost-effectiveness of community public health prevention approaches. Retrieved from https://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/06/cphpa/report.pdf Guide to Analyzing the Cost-Effectiveness of Community Public Health Prevention Approaches by Wilma Tilson, M.P.H., 2006. RTI Project Number 0208827.001U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Source: https://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/06/cphpa/report.pdf Document: Scholar-Practitioner Project (SPP) Guidelines Document: Grant Evaluation Rubric: Grant 1 Document: Grant Evaluation Rubric: Grant 2 Instruction filesgrant_proposals.docx(13,06 KiB) pubh_8315_week11_grantevaluationrubric_grant_1.pdf(43,58 KiB) pubh_8315_week11_grantevaluationrubric_grant_2.pdf(43,57 KiB)