Qualitative research critique

This assignment provides an opportunity for students to write a formal paper reflecting review and critique of a qualitative research article. The critique is an analysis of the qualitative research article. A Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide lists the questions to answer for the assignment. A link for the Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide is listed below. The questions listed on the Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide are based on required readings for module five and six, particularly chapter 5 of Polit and Beck (2017) in regard to completing an overall critique of a qualitative research report. Please thoroughly and accurately answer all questions on the Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide to fully meet grading criteria on the Qualitative Research Critique Grading Rubric. The Qualitative Research Critique Grading Rubric is provided below.

Students need to address each research component thoroughly from the content of the article, providing rationale for each of the statements. If a research component is not addressed in the article, students must explain whether or not this is justified.

The Qualitative Research Critique paper is a formal paper and should include a title page, an introduction, body of the paper, personal reflection, conclusion, and a reference page (listed on a separate page following the conclusion of the paper).  An abstract is not necessary. The paper should be no more than 8 or 9 pages, excluding title and reference page. The paper is to be written using APA format per APA (2020) manual. Citations and references must be included to support information shared in the paper. Citations and references need to reflect required readings as well as current (within the last three to five years) professional sources.
Please choose one of the following three articles on which to write your critique. Choose just one and include the entire citation in your critique.

Mcabe, M., Behrens, L., Browning, S., Vessey, J., Williams, M. (2019). The clinical research nurse: Exploring self-perceptions about the value of the role. American Journal of Nursing, 119(8), 24-32.

MSN 600 Qualitative Article The Clinical Research Nurse Exploring Self Perceptions About the Value of the Role.pdf

Paddock, K., Wilson, C., Walshe, C., & Todd, C. (2019). Care home life and identity: A qualitative case study. The Gerontological Society of America, 59(4), 655-664. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000126

MSN 600 Qualitative Article Care Home Life and Identity A Qualitative Case Study.pdf

Salzmann-Erikson, M., & Hicdurmaz, D. (2017). Use of social media among individuals who suffer from post-traumatic stress: A qualitative analysis of narratives. Qualitative Health Research, 27(2), 285-294. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315627364

MSN 600 Qualitative Article Use of Social Media Among Individuals Who Suffer From Post Traumatic Stress A Qualitative Analysis of Narrative.pdf

Assignment Objectives:

Critique study objectives in research reports.
Demonstrate knowledge of methods to gather and organize information for a study.
Identify research problems generated from the practice setting.
Critique research problems and the purpose for a study.
Critique literature reviews for relevance, currency, and multidisciplinary sources.

Qualitative Research Article Critique Grading Rubric is provided below.

*The last 4 criteria of the rubric are for faculty to assess student writing of this formal paper assignment. Students do not include the last 4 criteria in their paper. The criteria that are reserved for faculty only AND that students do not write to are the following:

—Ideas organized and clearly expressed including an introduction and summary–4 points

—Information of the critique provided with few quotes from original sources–4 points

—Grammar and sentence structure is correct–6 points

—Adheres to APA 7th edition format/style–6 point

*Plagiarized papers will be given a grade of zero and could result in failure of the course.

Rubric
Qualitative Article Critique Grading Rubric
Qualitative Article Critique Grading Rubric
Criteria    Ratings    Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTitle: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
2.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
1.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract:Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
2.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
1.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Purpose:Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
2.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
1.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Significance: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
2.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
1.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Statement of Problem: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
2.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Qualitative Method Used: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
2.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
1.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
2.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Research Question: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
2.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Literature Review: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
4.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction-Conceptual Underpinnings: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
6.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
3.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethod-Protection of Human Rights: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
2.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethod-Research Design and Research Tradition: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
4.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethod-Sample and Setting: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
4.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethod-Data Collection: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
2.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethod-Procedures: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
2.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethod-Enhancement of Trustworthiness: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
6.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
3.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults-Data Analysis: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
6.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
3.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults-Findings: Refer to Qualitative Research Critique Paper Question Guide for questions to answer.
8.0 pts
Full Marks
Clearly covered.
4.0 pts
Half
Partially and/or unclearly covered.
0.0 pts
No Marks
Incorrect or missing.
8.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdeas organized and clearly expressed including an introduction, personal reflection, and conclusion/summary. *Faculty assess student writing.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
2.0 pts
Half
0.0 pts
No Marks
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInformation of the critique provided with few quotes from original sources. *Faculty assess student writing.
4.0 pts
Full Marks
2.0 pts
Half
0.0 pts
No Marks
No Marks and/or Plagiarism Plagiarism: Source material not adequately paraphrased; direct quotes not identified; source material not referenced. *Plagiarized papers will be given a grade of zero and could result in failure of the course
4.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, sentence structure is correct. *Faculty assess student writing.
6.0 pts
Full Marks
3.0 pts
Half
0.0 pts
No Marks
6.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAdheres to APA 7th Edition format/style. *Faculty assess student writing.
6.0 pts
Full Marks
3.0 pts
Half
0.0 pts
No Marks
6.0 pt

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.