Need help with this assignment?Get an original answer from a qualified tutor — from $10/page.
Get it written →Instructions
1. Complete the virtual lab in MH Connect.
2 Write your lab report in essay format. Your report must include the following in 1-2 pages:
- Introduction
- Hypothesis
- Methods
- Results
- Conclusion
Resources
Writing Tips: Lab Reports and Scientific Papers:
How to Write your Lab Report:
MIC101 Lab Report Grading Rubric 20points
MIC101 Lab Report Grading Rubric 20points
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
|
2 to >1.8 pts
Full Marks
Background information is completely accurate Background information has the appropriate level of specificity to provide concise and useful context to aid the readers understanding. Primary literature references are relevant, adequately explained, and indicate a reasonable literature search.
|
1.8 to >1.5 pts
Partial
Background omits information or contains inaccuracies which detract from the major point of the paper. Background information is overly narrow or overly general (only partially relevant). Primary literature references, if present, are inadequately explained.
|
1.5 to >0 pts
No Marks
Background information is missing or contains major inaccuracies. Background information is accurate, but irrelevant or too disjointed to make relevance clear Primary literature references are absent or irrelevant.
|
|
2 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHypothesis
|
4 to >2.0 pts
Full Marks
Hypotheses are novel, insightful, or actually have the potential to contribute useful new knowledge to the field.
|
2 to >0.0 pts
Partial
Hypotheses are plausible and appropriate though likely or clearly taken directly from course material.
|
0 pts
No Marks
Hypotheses are trivial, obvious, incorrect or completely off topic.
|
|
4 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMethods
|
3 to >1.5 pts
Full Marks
Appropriate. Clearly explained. A synthesis of multiple previous approaches or an entirely new approach
|
1.5 to >0.0 pts
Partial
Drawn directly from coursework Not modified where appropriate
|
0 pts
No Marks
Inappropriate Poorly explained /indecipherable
|
|
3 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResults
|
3 to >1.5 pts
Full Marks
Data are relevant, accurate and comprehensive. Reader can fully evaluate validity of writers conclusions and assumptions. Data may be synthesized or manipulated in a novel way to provide additional insight.
|
1.5 to >0.0 pts
Partial
At least one relevant dataset per hypothesis is provided but some necessary data are missing or inaccurate Reader can satisfactorily evaluate some but not all of writers conclusions.
|
0 pts
No Marks
Data are too incomplete or haphazard to provide a reasonable basis for testing the hypothesis
|
|
3 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
|
5 to >3.34 pts
Full Marks
Conclusions are completely justified by data. Connections between hypothesis, data, and conclusions are comprehensive and persuasive.
|
3.34 to >0.0 pts
Partial
Conclusions have some direct basis in the data, but may contain some gaps in logic or data or are overly broad. Connections between hypothesis, data and conclusions are present but weak.
|
0 pts
No Marks
Conclusions have little or no basis in data provided. Connections between hypothesis, data and conclusion are non- existent, limited, vague or otherwise insufficient to allow reasonable evaluation of their merit.
|
|
5 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePage Requirements
|
3 to >2.01 pts
Full Marks
1-2 pages
|
2.01 to >0.0 pts
Partial
1 page or less
|
0 pts
No Marks
less than 1 page
|
|
3 pts
|
|
Total Points: 20
|
Get a plagiarism-free answer to this question
Send us your instructions and we’ll match you with the best writer in your subject.
- 100% human-written, zero AI
- Turnitin report included
- Confidential — we never share your data
- Free revisions & refunds