Does not respond to the discusion question

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_6670_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Grid View

List View

Outstanding Performance Excellent Performance Competent Performance Proficient Performance Room for Improvement

Main Posting: Response to the discusion question is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

44 (44%) – 44 (44%)

* Thoroughly responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. * supported by at least 3 current, credible sources

40 (40%) – 43 (43%)

* Responds to the discusion question(s) *is reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

* Responds to most of the discusion question(s) *is somewhat reflecive with critical analysis and synthesis representive of knowledg gained from the course readings for the module. * 50% of post has exceptional depth and breadth * supported by at least 3 credible references

31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

* Responds to some of the discusion question(s) * one to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addresed *is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * post is cited with fewer than 2 credible references

0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

* Does not respond to the discusion question(s) * lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria *lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis *does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. * contains only 1 or no credible references

Main Posting: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

* Written clearly and concisely * Contains no grammatical or spelling errors * Fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Written clearly and concisely * May contain one or no grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

* Written concisely * May contain one to two grammatical or spelling error * Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style

4 (4%) – 5 (5%)

*Writtten somewhat concisely * May contain more than two2 spelling or grammatical errors * Contains some APA formatting erros

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

* Not written clearly or concisely * Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors * Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style

Main Posting: Timely and full participation

10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts main discussion by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

* does not meet requirement for full participation

First Reponse

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

* reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

First Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

* Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

First Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

* does not meet requirement for full participation

Second Reponse: Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings * responds to questions posed by faculty * the use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives

8.5 (8.5%) – 8.5 (8.5%)

* response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings

7.5 (7.5%) – 8 (8%)

* response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting

6.5 (6.5%) – 7 (7%)

* response is on topic, may have some depth

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

* reponse may not be on topic, lacks depth

Second Reponse: Writing

6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are fully answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5.5 (5.5%) – 5.5 (5.5%)

* Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are answered if posed * Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources * Response is effectively written in Standard Edited English

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

* Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues * Response to faculty questions are mostly answered if posed * Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources * Response is written in Standard Edited English

4.5 (4.5%) – 4.5 (4.5%)

* Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication * Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered if posed * Few or no credible sources are cited

0 (0%) – 4 (4%)

* Responses posted in the discussion lack effective * Response to faculty questions are missing * No credible sources are cited

Second Reponse: Timely and full participation

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

* meets requirements for timely and full participation * posts by due date

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

* does not meet requirement for full participation

Total Points: 100

Name: NURS_6670_Week1_Discussion_Rubric