For your initial post, begin by reviewing the Research Changes and Practices Excerpts PDF document (uploaded) for information about the history of ho

PSY Programmatic Themes

Psychology is more than just one course you are taking in college. Psychology is everywhere! It’s a tool that can help you live a better life, make a bigger impact on the world, and build stronger relationships. As you complete coursework throughout your degree program, you’ll discover and rediscover five key themes. Each one illustrates a way to apply psychology in your life both personally and professionally. By the end of your program, you’ll have the tools to understand yourself more fully, improve your personal and professional connections, and effect positive change in the world.

 Self-care: When you hear the term self-care, you may think of things like bubble baths and dark chocolate. But self-care is about more than just pampering yourself. Engaging in self-care means taking time for personal reflection and developing skills to improve your well-being. You can also take care of yourself by increasing your resilience and self-regulation.

 Social justice: Everyone deserves the same rights and access to opportunities. When you apply psychology ethically and empathetically, you’re supporting social justice. As you work through this program, you’ll see that psychology can do more than just improve your own life—it can help you enhance the lives of others and promote social justice for society as a whole.

 Emotional intelligence (EI): Emotional intelligence is defined as the practice of self-control and the ability to accurately perceive the emotions of self and others, appropriately adapt emotions and actions in daily interactions, and consistently understand and express interest in the well- being of self and others. In short, it’s how you understand and respond to emotions in yourself and the people around you. Emotional intelligence is not just an abstract concept. It’s a set of skills, including self-awareness, self-regulation, ethical judgment, empathy, social awareness, and conflict resolution.

 Career connections: Even if you don’t become a psychologist, studying psychology can help advance your career. Psychology helps explain why people behave in certain ways and how you can work with them more effectively. Whether you major in psychology or use this course as a stepping-stone to other opportunities, the study of psychology can improve your daily life and job prospects.

 Ethics: Modern psychology is guided by ethical principles. While formal ethics are set by governing bodies such as the American Psychological Association, you also have your own set of values and morals that influence your personal ethics. Throughout your coursework, you will apply ethics by citing your sources.

1

1

PSY 215 Research Changes and Practices Excerpts

Excerpt 1 This article addresses how homosexuality was pathologized in the DSM. “A good example is the pathologisation of homosexuality. Until the mid-1970s, homosexuality was classified as a mental illness on the DSM (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—see below). In December of 1973, the APA board of trustees voted to declassify homosexuality as a mental disorder. In 1974, the DSM was updated, and homosexuality was replaced with a new diagnostic code for individuals distressed by their homosexuality (Spitzer, 1981). However, it is still classified as a mental illness in the latest edition of the Chinese diagnostic system (CCMD-3), is illegal in many countries and carries the death penalty in several African countries.” (Humphreys, 2011, “The Human and Cultural/Historical Construction of Abnormality” section, para. 3)

Excerpt 2 This article outlines the history of homosexuality in the DSM. “The American Psychiatric Association (APA) recently completed a several year process of revising the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5). During that time, there were objections raised to retaining DSM’s gender identity disorder diagnoses and calls to remove them, just as homosexuality had been removed from DSM-II in 1973. At the conclusion of the DSM-5 revision process, the gender diagnoses were retained, albeit in altered form and bearing the new name of ‘gender dysphoria.’ The author of this paper was a member of the DSM-5 Workgroup on Sexual and Gender Identity Disorders and presently serves on the WHO Working Group on Sexual Disorders and Sexual Health. Both groups faced similar tasks: reconciling patients’ needs for access to care with the stigma of being given a psychiatric diagnosis. The differing nature of the two diagnostic manuals led to two different outcomes. As background, this paper updates the history of homosexuality and the gender diagnoses in the DSM and in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD) as well as what is expected to happen to the homosexuality and gender diagnoses following the current ICD-11 revision process.” (Drescher, 2015b)

Excerpt 3: This article outlines theoretical views on homosexuality and addresses destigmatization. “APA’s 1973 diagnostic revision was the beginning of the end of organized medicine’s official participation in the social stigmatization of homosexuality. Similar shifts gradually took place in the international mental health community as well. In 1990, the World Health Organization removed homosexuality per se from the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) [64]. As a consequence, debates about homosexuality gradually shifted away from medicine and psychiatry and into the moral and political realms as religious, governmental, military, media, and educational institutions were deprived of medical or scientific rationalization for discrimination. As a result, cultural attitudes about homosexuality changed in the U.S. and other countries as those who accepted scientific authority on such matters gradually came to accept the normalizing view. For if homosexuality was no longer considered an illness, and if one did not literally accept biblical prohibitions against it, and if gay people are able and prepared to function as productive citizens, then what is wrong with being gay? Additionally, if there is nothing wrong with being gay, what moral and

2

legal principles should the larger society endorse in helping gay people openly live their lives?” (Drescher, 2015a, 571–572)

Excerpt 4: This article gives an overview and outlines the history of the PTSD diagnosis. “The risk of exposure to trauma has been a part of the human condition since we evolved as a species. Attacks by saber tooth tigers or twenty-first century terrorists have probably produced similar psychological sequelae in the survivors of such violence. Shakespeare’s Henry IV appears to meet many, if not all, of the diagnostic criteria for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), as have other heroes and heroines throughout the world’s literature. The history of the development of the PTSD concept is described by Trimble (1). In 1980, the American Psychiatric Association (APA) added PTSD to the third edition of its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-III) nosologic classification scheme (2). Although controversial when first introduced, the PTSD diagnosis has filled an important gap in psychiatric theory and practice. From an historical perspective, the significant change ushered in by the PTSD concept was the stipulation that the etiological agent was outside the individual (i.e., a traumatic event) rather than an inherent individual weakness (i.e., a traumatic neurosis). The key to understanding the scientific basis and clinical expression of PTSD is the concept of ‘trauma.’” (Friedman, n.d., “A Brief History of the PTSD Diagnosis” section, paras. 1–2)

References Drescher, J. (2015a). Out of DSM: Depathologizing Homosexuality. Behavioral Sciences, 5(4), 565–575.

https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.3390%2Fbs 5040565

Drescher, J. (2015b). Queer diagnoses revisited: The past and future of homosexuality and gender

diagnoses in DSM and ICD [Abstract]. International Review of Psychiatry, 27(5), 386–395. https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.3109%2F0 9540261.2015.1053847

Friedman, M. J. (n.d.). PTSD history and overview. PTSD: National Center for PTSD. U.S. Department of

Veterans Affairs. https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/essentials/history_ptsd.asp#:~:text=In%201980%2 C%20the%20American%20Psychiatric,in%20psychiatric%20theory%20and%20practice

Humphreys, P. (2011, April). Psychopathologies: Paul Humphreys explores definitions and diagnoses of

‘abnormality,’ from historical perspectives to the present day. Psychology Review, 16(4), 2+. Spitzer, R. L. (1981). The diagnostic status of homosexuality in DSM-III: a reformulation of the issues.

American Journal of Psychiatry, 138(2), 210-215.

https://go.openathens.net/redirector/snhu.edu?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10. 1176%2Fajp.138.2.210

3