Compare and contrast these two forms of teaching.? Within your discussion, be sure to address the following questions: What are the central concepts of each method?
he resources this week discuss direct instruction and constructivist learning. For this discussion, compare and contrast these two forms of teaching. Within your discussion, be sure to address the following questions:
- What are the central concepts of each method?
- What do you feel is the single most salient benefit for each method of teaching? The most notable disadvantage?
- Does the appropriateness of using either of these primary teaching methods change according to student age level? Consider the grade level that you are most likely to teach (or currently work with if you are already teaching) and discuss which method you feel would be more appropriate for this level.
- And finally, which method would you rely on more heavily as an intentional teacher? Why?
- Be sure to include properly cited scholarly sources.
Academic Research International ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944
Vol. 4 No. 6 November 2013
Part-II: Educational and Management Sciences SAVAP International
Copyright © 2013 www.savap.org.pk
www.journals.savap.org.pk
301
EFFECTS OF DIRECT INSTRUCTION AND SOCIAL
CONSTRUCTIVISM ON LEARNERS’ CONGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT:
A COMPARATIVE STUDY
Waitshega Tefo Smitta Moalosi
Department of Educational Foundations, University of Botswana,
BOTSWANA.
ABSTRACT
Direct instruction and Social constructivism are discussed in this paper as different
approaches that can enhance the learner’s cognitive development. Direct instruction
is teacher centered and the teacher is the director in the learning setting. Social
constructivism is learner centered and it enables learners to have ownership in
learning, and to develop their thinking more than those depending much on the
teacher guidance. This paper concludes that, social constructivism can have more
effect on the learner’s cognitive development than direct instruction. Learners will be able to share their ideas and collaborate with others to solve different problems they
encounter in the learning environment.
Keywords: Direct instructions, social constructivism, cognitive development
INTRODUCTION
The discussion in this paper is a comparison of Direct instruction and Social constructivism.
Direct instruction is a teacher centered approach while social constructivism is learner
centered. Teacher centered approaches makes the teacher to have more control in the
learning setting; and learners become passive recipients of information provided for them by
the teacher. In a learner-centered approach, learners construct knowledge and take
responsibility for their own learning. Social constructivism can enhance students’ learning
more than direct instruction approach. This reasoning is supported by discussing direct
instruction, and its four phases, social constructivism, and the four characteristics and situated
cognition.
DIRECT INSTRUCTION
Direct instruction is described as “an instructional model to teach well defined knowledge and skills needed for later learning” (Eggen & Kauchak, 2010, p. 409). Some examples of
direct instruction involve younger students using basic operations to solve math problems, students’ using grammar and punctuation in writing, and chemistry students’ balancing
equations. Eggen and Kauchak (2010) have found that direct instruction is effective when skills involve detailed steps. This is especially helpful in working with students who are low
achievers or with those with disabilities. A description of examples of a direct instruction
lesson are discussed below:
1. State learning objectives and orient students to learn the lesson: The teacher is expected to tell the students what they should be learning.
2. Review prerequisites: A revision of skills and concepts learned in previous lessons).
3. Present new materials: The teacher should is expected to present new information with examples to aid students’ learning.
Academic Research International ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944
Vol. 4 No. 6 November 2013
Part-II: Educational and Management Sciences SAVAP International
Copyright © 2013 www.savap.org.pk
www.journals.savap.org.pk
302
4. Conduct learning probes: Questions should be used to assess students’ level of
understanding (Slavin, 2012, p.185).
The above characteristics of direct lessons show that most work is done by the teacher.
The four phases of direct instruction are discussed (see Table below). The four phases of
direct instruction are cognitive in nature. Because the researchers mentioned below thought the four phases of direct instruction are related to human memory, it is important to discuss
them. This writer thinks that they represent a cognitive view of direct instruction. Eggen and
Kauchak (2010) suggested that, the model is cognitive and related to the human memory. The
above mentioned researcher’s findings are supported because one of the model’s cognitive
components, attention, is critical in human learning. Information from the environment
reaches the senses (sensory register) and then passes to the working memory when it is
attended to. It will be transferred to the Long-term memory where it will be stored
permanently. Learners can retrieve the information if they need to use it. Also, Eggen and
Kauchak (2010) proposed that Vygotsky’s (1978) notion of scaffolding is related to Direct
Instruction. Scaffolding is a process where an adult or an experienced peer help learners with
some activities, but when learners are capable of working alone; the adult should reduce
his/her guidance. (See the third phase of the model).
Table 1. Relationships between Phases and Cognitive Learning Components and Cognitive-
Based Direct Instruction (Eggen & Kauchak, 2010 p.410)
Phase Cognitive Learning Component
Introduction and Review: Teachers begin with form of introductory focus
and review previous work.
Attract attention
Access prior knowledge from long-term memory.
Developing Understanding:
Teachers describe and model the skill or explain
and present examples of the concept. Teachers
emphasize understanding.
Acquire declarative knowledge about the skill or
concept.
Encode declarative knowledge into long-term
memory.
Guided practice: Students practice the skill or
identify additional examples of the concept, and
the teacher provides scaffolding.
Move through the associative stage of developing
procedural knowledge.
Independent Practice: Students practice on their
own. Develop automaticity with the skill or concept.
The first phase Introduction and Review suggests that learning begins with attention. Students
are expected to pay attention in the beginning of the lesson. The teacher can find out the students’ opinions regarding the lesson by asking them to give descriptions of the ‘problem
asked’ and revise the work they have done to recover “prior knowledge from the long-term memory” (Eggen and Kauchak, 2010, p.411).
The second phase Developing Understanding focuses on the teacher as modeling the skills,
explaining and demonstrating how students should use the skills. In the second phase the
students obtain the ‘declarative and conditional knowledge’ that help them to be able to
adjust, and get used to applying knowledge in various situations. The declarative knowledge
contained in the Long-term memory is characterized by facts, concepts, procedures and rules
(Eggen and Kauchak, 2010).
Guided practice is emphasized in the third phase. Learners practice skills as teachers scaffold
them. The scaffolding metaphor suggests that teachers guide learners through the tasks that
Academic Research International ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944
Vol. 4 No. 6 November 2013
Part-II: Educational and Management Sciences SAVAP International
Copyright © 2013 www.savap.org.pk
www.journals.savap.org.pk
303
they are engaged in. As learners master the tasks, the teacher must reduce his/her assistance
so that learners can work by themselves without guidance.
The final phase is Independent Practice; the teacher assists students to shift from thinking
about the skill to ‘performing it automatically’. And it encourages responsibility in their
learning and reduces scaffolding as well. The teacher is expected to monitor students
learning. When the teacher monitors students in their learning, it may involve the power of
the teacher over students when working with them, which it is a limitation of the approach.
Social constructivism avoids this limitation by encouraging students take responsibility in
their learning.
SOCIAL CONSTRUCTIVISM
Social constructivism is an aspect of constructivism that suggests that “learners first construct
knowledge in a social context and then individually internalize it” (Eggen and Kauchak,
2010, p. 227). Social constructivism is a process by which more knowledgeable adults or
experienced peers provide guidance which leads to transmission of knowledge so that higher
mental functions and develop in the social learning environment.
Social constructivism helps us to understand the teacher’s role in the learning setting. Teachers use the question methods with instructions and they organize and use learning
activities, motivating and assessing students. The main focus of the social constructivism approach is to facilitate “students’ constructions of knowledge using social interaction”
Flemingo and Alexander (as cited in Eggen & Kauchak, 2010 p.349).
The social constructivism view is, when the learning environment is created by
knowledgeable others, learners have the ability to exchange their ideas as well as collaborate
with others to solve problems. Santrock, (2009) added “in this way, experience in social
contexts provide an important mecha nism for the development of students’ thinking” (p.349). And teacher- centered approaches enable the teacher to be in control of the learning
environment and conditions learners to receive knowledge prepared for them. Therefore, the students’ efforts to create knowledge for themselves are constrained. Learners need to
develop cognitive processes and critical thinking; they ought to be exposed to learning environments that enhance construction of knowledge.
Social constructivists agree on the four characteristics, and the four characteristics have
implications for Cognitive education because social constructivist’s major principle is
“learners construct, rather than record, knowledge” (Eggen and Kauchak 2010, p. 230).
Other theorists believe “the view of the learner has changed from that of a recipient of
knowledge to that of a constructor of knowledge” (p. 230). The characteristics are discussed
below:
Four Characteristics of Social Constructivists
Learners are viewed as creating knowledge that makes sense to them and having control in
their learning. They are perceived as having changed from receiving knowledge from more
knowledgeable others to constructors of knowledge. Eggen and Kauchak (2010) proposed
that “Learners construct knowledge that makes sense to them” (p.230).
New learning depends on what the learners understand. Learning is perceived as meaningful
and social constructivists stress prior knowledge in facilitating learning. Eggen and Kauchak,
2010) suggested that, the emphases from social constructivists, learners develop thoughts to
construct knowledge and are embedded in the existing knowledge they have. Therefore, “new
learning depends on current understanding” (p.230).
Academic Research International ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944
Vol. 4 No. 6 November 2013
Part-II: Educational and Management Sciences SAVAP International
Copyright © 2013 www.savap.org.pk
www.journals.savap.org.pk
304
Learners are perceived as learning from each other and sharing ideas. Interacting with adults
or experienced peers students learn how to solve different kinds of problems. Thus, “Social
interaction facilitates learning” (Eggen and Kauchak (2010 p.230).
The internalization theory of Vygotsky proposed that children learn first by being engaged in
the activities under adult support and with time they continue to perform activities alone.
Therefore, the behavior will be viewed as first regulated socially by instruction of adults, and
then become regulated on their mental plane (Brynes, 2008).
The fourth idea that social constructivists suggested has an influence in learning is real- world tasks. Their perspectives on the above mentioned idea are rooted in situated cognition. They
proposed that most of what is learned is explicit to the setting in which “it is learned.” Anderson et al., (as cited in Eggen and Kauchak, 2010, p. 230). Real world tasks are also
called authentic tasks, learning activities where a student put into practice thinking that is
related to what is essential in the world Eggen & Kauchak, 2010).
Thinking is significant: Authentic activities are activities that promote thinking as well as problem –solving skills. Authentic activities are important in school and out of school setting.
“The most meaningful learning occurs within real-world tasks” (p.230). For example, when students use their knowledge of science to explain the importance of wearing seat belts when
driving; it is an example of including authentic learning activities (Eggen and kauchak 2010).
Situated cognition is related to the most meaningful learning discussed above. Learners are
perceived as ‘learning by participation’ borrowed from Lave & Wenger (1991). The school
setting is a place where learning is situated.
Situated Cognition
Situated cognition is vital in the social constructivist perspective; it implies that thinking is
situated in the social and physical environment not in the person’s mind (Santrock 2009). On one hand knowledge is rooted in, and related to the environment “in which the knowledge
is developed” (Santrock, 2009 p.350). The cognitive view perceives knowledge as possession while the socio-cultural sees knowledge as “belonging, participating and communicating”
Mason, 2007, p.3) Their explanations suggest that knowledge is not an ‘entity’ in the head of an individual, which the individual can obtain, develop or modify, but an action that cannot
be thought of as disconnected from the environment in which it takes place. The classroom is
“a community of learners” the teachers and students do joint work of learning together
aiming at assisting other individuals to achieve their goal in the learning environment Eggen
and Kauchak, 2010).
CONCLUSION
Direct instruction and social constructivism of knowledge differ in relation to student
learning. Direct instruction approach can contribute less input for learners in their
construction of knowledge. Direct instruction approach does not enhance much of
individual’s cognitive abilities. Social constructivists advocate for creation of learning
settings where learners share ideas and work in collaboration with each other solving
different problems they encounter as they learn.
The key element is the teacher has to make sure the type of learning where students construct
knowledge happens. Also, students are involved with others as they learn. They have the
chance of evaluating and improving their understanding through interaction and “exposed to
the thinking of others and as they participate in creating and understanding” (Santrock 2009,
p.350). When students interact and assist each other in learning; their cognitive abilities
Academic Research International ISSN-L: 2223-9553, ISSN: 2223-9944
Vol. 4 No. 6 November 2013
Part-II: Educational and Management Sciences SAVAP International
Copyright © 2013 www.savap.org.pk
www.journals.savap.org.pk
305
increase and are free as the learning environment becomes conducive. It is cooperative work
and learning. Cooperative learning happens when students are engaged in small groups
helping each other in the learning setting. Students are encouraged to work in pairs or groups
not exceeding four members. Ashman and Conway, 1997) add “the aim is to ensure that students work together to maximize their own and other group members’ learning” (p. 143).
The four characteristics social constructivists agree on stress that learners create meaningful
knowledge. When learners create knowledge that makes sense is motivated to learn by them.
Situated cognition is significant in the social construction of knowledge, it implies that
thinking is located (situated) within the social and physical environment not within the
learner’s mind. The learner’s knowledge is “embedded in” attached to the environment where
knowledge is developing. (Santrock, 2009, p. 350)
REFERENCES
[1] Ashman, F. & Conway, R. N. F. (1997) an introduction to cognitive education: theory
and applications. London: Routledge.
[2] Brynes, J. P. (2008) Cognitive development and learning: instructional contexts.
London: Pearson, Educational Inc.
[3] Eggen, P. & Kauchak, D. (2010) Educational psychology: windows on classroom
(eight edition). London: Pearson Education, Inc.
[4] Lave J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge: University Press.
[5] Manson, L. (2007) Introduction: bridging the cognitive and socio-cultural approaches
in research on conceptual change: is it feasible? Educational psychologist, 42(1), 1-7.
[6] Santrock, J. W. (2009) Educational psychology (4 th Edition). London: Mc Graw- Hill.
[7] Slavin, R. E. (2012). Educational psychology (10 th
edition). London: Pearson.
[8] Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in the society: the development of higher psychological
processes. Harvard University Press.
AUTHOR’s PROFILE
Dr. Waitshega Tefo Smitta Moalosi is a Senior Lecturer in the Department of Educational Foundations, University of Botswana. She teaches courses in Educational Psychology. Dr.
Moalosi started teaching in the University of Botswana in January, 2000 as a Staff
Development Fellow (SDF).
Dr. Moalosi holds the following qualifications: a) PhD in Educational Psychology and Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (USA), b) M.ED Psychology of Education,
Bristol University, (England UK), c) BSc Psychology, Bolton Institute of Higher Education (England UK). Diploma in Counseling Studies, Keele University, (England UK). d)Primary
Teachers Certificate, Serowe Teacher Training College, Botswana.
Smitta’s research interests are: Teacher efficacy and classroom management, reasons for
choosing teaching as a career, self- concept and adolescent development.
,
Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice
Twelfth Edition
Chapter 7
The Effective Lesson
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
If this PowerPoint presentation contains mathematical equations, you may need to check that your computer has the following installed:
1) MathType Plugin
2) Math Player (free versions available)
3) NVDA Reader (free versions available)
Organizing Questions
What Is Direct Instruction?
How Is a Direct Instruction Lesson Taught?
How Does Research on Direct Instruction Methods Inform Teaching?
How Do Students Learn and Transfer Concepts?
How are Discussions Used in Instruction?
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
What Is Direct Instruction?
At times, the most effective and efficient way to teach students is for you to present information, skills, or concepts in a direct fashion.
The term direct instruction is used to describe lessons in which you transmit information directly to students, structuring class time to reach a clearly defined set of objectives as efficiently as possible.
Direct instruction is particularly appropriate for teaching a well-defined body of information or skills that all students must master.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
How Is a Direct Instruction Lesson Taught?
The general lesson structure is vastly different in different subject areas and different grade levels.
The sequence of activities in direct instruction flows along a logical path:
arousing student interest
presenting new information
allowing students to practice their new knowledge or skills
assessment
This orderly progression is essential to direct instruction at any grade level and in any subject, although various components look different for different subjects and grades.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
State Learning Objectives
The first step in presenting a lesson is to state learning objectives and orient students to the lesson.
Tell students what they will be learning and what performance will be expected of them.
Whet students’ appetites for the lesson by informing them how interesting, important, or personally relevant it will be to them.
Give an astonishing or exciting opener that gets kids eager to learn the content.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Review Prerequisites
For the next major task in a lesson, you need to ensure that students have mastered prerequisite skills.
Go over any skills or concepts students need in order to understand the lesson.
Link information that is already in their minds to the information you are about to present.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Present New Material
Here begins the main body of the lesson, the point at which you present new information or skills.
In this step you teach the lesson by:
presenting information
giving examples
demonstrating concepts
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Conduct Learning Probes
Effective teaching requires you to be constantly aware of the effects of your instruction.
In this stage you conduct learning probes.
The term learning probe refers to any of a variety of ways of asking for brief student responses to lesson content.
To conduct a learning probe you will pose questions to students to assess their level of understanding and correct misconceptions.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Provide Independent Practice
The term independent practice refers to work students do in class on their own to practice or express newly learned skills or knowledge.
In this step of the lesson you will give students an opportunity to practice new skills or use new information on their own.
Independent practice is most critical when students are learning skills, such as mathematics, reading, grammar, composition, map interpretation, or a foreign language.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Assess Performance and Provide Feedback
Every lesson should contain an assessment of the degree to which students have mastered the objectives set for the lesson.
You should assess the effectiveness of the lesson and give the results of the assessment to students as soon as possible.
Steps in this process:
review independent practice work or give a quiz
give feedback on correct answers
reteach skills if necessary
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
Provide Distributed Practice and Review
Practice or review spaced out over time increases retention of many kinds of knowledge.
Steps in this process:
assign homework to provide distributed practice on the new material
in later lessons, review material
provide practice opportunities to increase the chances that students will remember what they learned and also be able to apply it in different circumstances
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
How Does Research on Direct Instruction Methods Inform Teaching?
Most of the principles of direct instruction discussed in this chapter have been derived from process-product studies in which observers record the teaching practices of teachers whose students consistently achieve at a high level.
Although the research on direct instruction models has produced mixed conclusions, most researchers agree that the main elements of these models are essential minimum skills that all teachers should have.
Copyright © 2018,2015,2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved
How do Students Learn and Transfer Concepts?
A very large proportion of all lessons focus on teaching concepts.
A concept is an abstract idea that is generalized from specific examples.
Concepts are generally learned in one of two ways:
most concepts we learn outside of school we learn by observation
other concepts are typically learned by definition: for example it is very difficult to learn the concept Aunt or Uncle through observation
Copyrig
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.