After the meeting with Mrs Gonzalez from Ayuntamiento of Montcada I Reixac (Barcelona), you as a PM, need to develop a scope o

Task:

The assignment must be prepared individually and submitted in pdf format.

Description:

After the meeting with Mrs Gonzalez from Ayuntamiento of Montcada I Reixac (Barcelona), you as a PM, need to develop a scope of statement for the project opening a public clinic in the region of approximately 35000 populations including parking and green zone. Besides presenting the Scope of the Project, you also advance with WBS and demonstrate the project priority (in matrix).

Useful information: Customer: Ayuntamiento of Montcada i Reixac (Barcelona) Budget: as economic as possible Deadline: September 2022 (the clinic should not be equipped; you propose just the building with parking and green area around) Special technical requirements: 1) no elevators (must be 1-floored building)

2) use of solar panels

Formalities:

• Wordcount: 500 words.

• Cover, Table of Contents, References and Appendix are excluded of the total wordcount.

• Font: Arial 12,5 pts.

• The in-text References and the Bibliography have to be in Harvard’s citation style.

Submission: Week 6, Sunday 6th March 23:59 CEST – Via Moodle (Turnitin).

Weight: This task is a 40% of your total grade for this subject.

Outcomes: This task assesses the following learning outcomes:

• Describe the need for a project-based approach inside organizations.

• Understand the role of project management as a strategic element inside organizations.

• Critically assess the roles and responsibilities of a Project Manager.

• Evaluate how to select, develop, plan schedule and measure its outcomes and risks.

BBA222 PROJECT MANAGEMENT – Task brief & rubrics ASSIGNMENT 2

Rubrics

Exceptional 90-100

Good 80-89

Fair 70-79

Marginal fail 60-69

Knowledge & Understanding

(20%)

Student demonstrates excellent understanding of key concepts and uses vocabulary in an entirely appropriate manner.

Student demonstrates good understanding of the task and mentions some relevant concepts and demonstrates use of the relevant vocabulary.

Student understands the task and provides minimum theory and/or some use of vocabulary.

Student understands the task

and attempts to answer the question but does not mention key concepts or uses minimum

amount of relevant vocabulary.

Application (30%) Student applies fully relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.

Student applies mostly relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class.

Student applies some relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstanding may be evident.

Student applies little relevant knowledge from the topics delivered in class. Misunderstands are evident.

Critical Thinking (30%)

Student critically assesses in excellent ways, drawing outstanding conclusions from relevant authors.

Student critically assesses in good ways, drawing conclusions from relevant authors and references.

Student provides some insights but stays on the surface of the topic. References may not be relevant.

Student makes little or none critical thinking insights, does not quote appropriate authors, and does not provide valid sources.

Communication (20%)

Student communicates their ideas extremely clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities.

Student communicates their ideas clearly and concisely, respecting the time limit and other formalities.

Student communicates their ideas with some clarity and concision. It may be slightly over or under the time limit. Some formalities are missing.

Student communicates their ideas in a somewhat unclear and unconcise way. It is over or under the time limit and formalities are not respected.