The project involves having you take someone from history, p

The project involves having you take someone from history, popular culture, sports, literature, or politics, and analyzing their personality from at least THREE perspectives or theories covered in this course. See the rubric below for more information.YOU HAVE TO COVER THREE. (Please list in separate document which three you covered) You can pick any three, I have included links to everything we have covered in class, please let me know if any of the links do not work https://nobaproject.com/modules/personality-traitshttps://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/eysenck.htmlhttps://moodle.ulm.edu/pluginfile.php/3016348/mod_resource/content/1/cattells-16-personality-factors-2795977.pdfhttp://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/allport.html( Allport’s, Cattell’s, and Eysenck’s trait theories propose that individuals possess certain personality traits that partially determine their behavior. ) https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/05/100512125257.htmhttps://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/kelly.htmlhttps://youtu.be/GyRE-78g_z0http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/ellis.htmlhttps://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/skinner.htmlhttp://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/bandura.htmlMaslow’s Theories https://www.businessballs.com/self-awareness/maslows-hierarchy-of-needs/Carl Rogers http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/rogers.htmlCarl Jung https://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/jung.htmlAlfred Adler https://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/adler.htmlFreud https://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/freud.htmlAnna Freud http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/annafreud.htmlErik Erikson http://webspace.ship.edu/cgboer/erikson.htmlPsychodynamic theories are attached in file, file on Raymond Cattell is also Attached Grading Rubric A (18-20 points)ExemplaryB (17-16) points)CompetentC (15-14 points)DevelopingD (13- 12) points) Minimal0Dimensions:Overall Understanding(20 points)Shows a deep/robust understanding of the topic with a fully developed argument per the categories belowShows a limited understanding of the topic, not quite a fully developed argument per the categories belowShows a superficial understanding of the topic, argument not developed enough per the categories belowShows no understanding of the topic and no argument per the categories belowNo effortArgument(20)Clearly articulates a position or argumentArticulates a position or argument that is incomplete or limited in scopeArticulates a position or argument that is unfocused or ambiguousDoes not articulate a position or argumentNo effortEvidence(20)Presents evidence that is relevant and accuratePresents a sufficientamount of evidence to support the argumentPresents evidence that is mostly relevant and/or mostly accuratePresents limited evidence to support an argumentPresents evidence that is somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant.Generally does notpresent enough evidence to support the argumentPresents a lot of inaccurate and/or irrelevantevidenceDoesn’t present enough evidence to support an argument anywhereNo effortStructure(20)There is logic in the progression of ideasThere are a few areas of disjointedness or intermittent lack of logical progression of ideasIdeas are somewhat disjointed and/or do not always flow logically, making it a bit difficult to followIdeas are disjointed and/or do not flow logically, hence argument is very difficult to followNo effortCreativity (or Mechanics)(20)OutstandingMild creativity or a few errorsRoutine creativity or mild errorsClichéd or many, many errorsNo effort