Establishing a Clear Communication Protocol

CIS314 – Enterprise Risk Management Unit 3 Assignment Forum: Risk Communication, Escalation, and Reporting – Group Assignment Due Dates: • • Friday at 11:59 pm EST of Unit 3 – Post to the Assignment Forum as a group Sunday at 11:59 pm EST of Unit 3 – Respond to at least one other group as an individual Points: 100 Overview: Risk communication, escalation, and reporting procedures are essential to manage potentially dangerous situations. The decisions making process involves more than one person. Instructions: You have been assigned to a group. In your group area: • Discuss strategies to follow when communicating, escalating, and reporting risks to organizational management. In the Unit 3 Assignment Forum discussion board: • • • Each group will pick a member that will post three distinct strategies the group created to Unit 3 Assignment Forum discussion board. Classmates in other groups will provide feedback on the effectiveness of your group’s posted strategies and include a follow up question for one of the strategies. Groups will respond to each other’s feedback and follow up questions. Requirements: • You will participate in the group area often with purposeful posts that aid in the strategies being developed. © 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED • • • • Submit your group’s three strategies to the Unit 3 Assignment Forum discussion board. Reference any resources used in APA format on your post. Respond to at least one other group as an individual and include a question for the group in your response. Respond to questions posed to your group. Be sure to read the criteria below by which your work will be evaluated before you write and again after you write. © 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Evaluation Rubric for Unit 3 Assignment Forum CRITERIA Needs Improvement 0 – 14 points 15 – 19 points Group Work: Participation in Participation in Participation the group area the group area was meaningful was less than 2 was more than 2 and aided in the times during the times during the development of week. Comments week. Comments the strategies made were not made were helpful to somewhat constructing the helpful and strategies. missing key details. Group Work: Quality of the strategies developed Group work: Number of strategies developed Clear and Professional Writing and APA Format Individual: Peer response to another group Deficient Proficient Exemplary 20 – 24 points Participation in the group area was more than 2 times during the week. Comments made were constructive and collegial but missing minor details. 25 points Participation in the group area was more than 3 times during the week. Comments made were constructive and collegial. The strategies created are lacking in clarity, cannot be implemented as written or are missing. The strategies created are basic and lacking key details. The presentation tone is acceptable. The strategies are clear and concise but missing minor details. They are presented in a professional manner to the organization’s leaders. The strategies are clear, concise, and purposeful. They are presented in a professional manner to the organization’s leaders. 0 points No strategies. 5 points 1 strategy. 8 points 2 strategies. 10 points 3 strategies. 0 – 2 points Errors impede professional presentation; guidelines not followed. 3 points Significant errors that do not impede professional presentation. 4 points Few errors that do not impede professional presentation. 5 points Writing and format are clear, professional, APA compliant, and error free. 0 – 8 points No response or question to another group is posted or it is poorly written. 9 – 11 points At least 1 response to another group. The assessment of the strategies 12 – 14 points At least 1 response to another group. The assessment of the strategies 15 points At least 1 response to another group. The assessment of the strategies is © 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED CRITERIA Individual: Peer response to questions posed to their group Posting due dates Deficient Needs Improvement and unique question was posed to the group was missing key details. and unique question was posed to the group was missing minor details. sound and helpful. A unique question was posed to the group. 0 – 5 points Does not respond or participate in the response to questions posed to their group. 6 – 7 points n/a 8 – 9 points n/a 10 points At least 1 response to a question posed to their group or adds clarification to a response from their group. The group assignment and the responses were not posted to the forum by the due date. n/a Either the assignment or responses were not posted by the due dates. Both the group assignment and all responses were posted to the forum by the due dates. © 2021 Post University, Waterbury, CT ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Proficient Exemplary