|
INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET RUBRIC
|
|
Criteria
|
Ratings
|
Pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Information
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
The brochure has all of the required information on 4 learning disabilities (see checklist) and some additional information
|
17 pts
Proficient
The brochure has all of the required information on 4 learning disabilities (see checklist)
|
14 pts
Basic
The brochure has most of the required information (see checklist) or all of the information on 3 learning disabilities.
|
11 pts
Minimal
The brochure has little of the required information or has all of the information on 2 or fewer learning disabilities.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2 – Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent – Accuracy
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
All facts are accurate and referenced
|
17 pts
Proficient
90% + of the facts are accurate and referenced. )
|
14 pts
Basic
80% + of the facts are accurate and referenced.
|
11 pts
Minimal
Less than 80% of the facts are accurate and referenced.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent Match to Intended Audience
|
|
10 pts
Advanced
Content is excellent match for intended audience.
|
8.5 pts
Proficient
Content is appropriate match for intended audience
|
7 pts
Basic
Content is somewhat a match to intended audience.
|
5.5 pts
Minimal
Content is not well matched to intended audience.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisual Appeal
|
|
10 pts
Advanced
Pamphlet has attractive format, well organized, graphics ‘fit’ well.
|
8.5 pts
Proficient
Pamphlet is well organized but format or graphics don’t ‘fit’ well with topic.
|
7 pts
Basic
Pamphlet is not well organized but format or graphics ‘fit’ the topic well.
|
5.5 pts
Minimal
Pamphlet organization and graphics cause confusion.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSources
|
|
20 pts
Advanced
There are 3 credible sources for each disability and all are referenced (
|
17 pts
Proficient
There are 2 credible sources for each disability and all are referenced )
|
14 pts
Basic
There is only one credible source for each disability and all are referenced
|
11 pts
Minimal
There are no sources referenced for one or more of the targeted disabilities.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
20 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA formatting
|
|
10 pts
Advanced
The presentation specifically attends to Belhaven APA format. There is a Works Cited/ Reference page with no errors.
|
8.5 pts
Proficient
Consistently follows Belhaven APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references (NO errors).
|
7 pts
Basic
Limited (no more than 3) APA errors in Belhaven APA format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.
|
5.5 pts
Minimal
More than 6 APA errors in format including title page, running heads, citations, quotations or references.
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics
|
|
10 pts
Advanced
The presentation demonstrates exceptional use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.
|
8.5 pts
Proficient
The presentation demonstrates consistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax). NO ERRORS.
|
7 pts
Basic
The presentation demonstrates inconsistent use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
5.5 pts
Minimal
The presentation does NOT demonstrate use of standard English conventions (mechanics, usage, grammar and syntax).
|
0 pts
No Marks
|
|
10 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2B – Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills
|
|
—
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeInTASC #2C – Learning Differences
The teacher uses understanding of individual differences and diverse cultures and communities to ensure inclusive learning environments that allow each learner to reach his/her full potential.
threshold: 3.0 pts
|
|
4 pts
Advanced – The candidate’s performance is exemplary and consistently exceeds expectations. Indications of a high level of critical and reflective thinking, with a depth of understanding a core knowledge base, as well as demonstrates academic and professional skills.
|
3 pts
Proficient – The candidate’s performance consistently meets expectations. The candidate effectively demonstrations the requirements with expected professional performance indicating an understanding of a core knowledge base with the application of critical thinking, academic, and professional skills.
|
2 pts
Basic – The candidate’s performance sometimes meets expectations but is not doing so consistently. Candidate demonstrates little depth of knowledge base understanding and little evidence of critical and/or reflective thinking.
|
1 pts
Minimal – The candidate’s performance demonstrates mediocre work, very little effort or demonstration of responses to requirements. The candidate demonstrates little to no understanding of a core knowledge base with little to no critical/reflective thinking, academic or professional skills.
|
|
—
|
<tr
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions
College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018
and Read the Article “Access for All” (https://www.mdek12.org/OAE/2019-Access-for-All-GuideLinks to an external site.)