Epidemiology and Population Health NURS 6700 Week 9 Assignment
Assignment for NURS 6700 Week 9 (Epidemiology and Population Health, Walden University)
Assignment 4: Planning for Evaluation
Section 5 of Major Assessment 7: Using an Epidemiological Approach to Critically Analyze a Population Health Problem
This assignment completes the development of your Major Assessment 7 by adding the final evaluation section. It builds directly on Sections 1–2 (Week 6: Defining the Problem and Research Methods), Sections 3–4 (Week 8: Developing an Intervention and Determining the Impact), and your work from earlier weeks on the selected population health problem.
Purpose (exact language from course documents):
DNP-prepared nurses are expected to effectively use research methods to analyze data, “design evidence-based interventions, [and] predict and analyze outcomes…,” (AACN, 2006, p. 11). Every research design requires you to evaluate your results. Epidemiologic studies are no different. … As you begin working on Assignment 4, Section 5 of the Major Assessment 7 paper, consider how you would evaluate the anticipated results of your population health intervention developed in Sections 3 and 4. This Assignment provides you with an opportunity to practice that skill.
To Prepare:
Review the Major Assessment 7 Overview (with Section 5 highlighted).
Review Exhibit 8–7: The Four Stages of Evaluation (Formative Evaluation, Process Evaluation, Impact Evaluation, Outcome Evaluation) on page 400 of Epidemiology for Public Health Practice (Friis & Sellers).
Review articles in the Learning Resources on program evaluation in various settings.
Reflect on how you would evaluate the anticipated results of the intervention you proposed in Sections 3 and 4.
The Assignment:
Write Section 5: Evaluation of your Major Assessment 7 paper. In approximately 3 pages (not including title page and references if submitting as a standalone section), include the following:
An Introduction ending with a purpose statement (e.g., “The purpose of this paper is…”).
A detailed evaluation plan based on the health outcome you have chosen and your anticipated results. Select and justify the best method(s) for evaluating the effect of the intervention from the four stages of evaluation:
Formative Evaluation
Process Evaluation
Impact Evaluation
Outcome Evaluation
Describe how you would implement the chosen evaluation approach(es), including:
Specific evaluation questions
Outcome measures and data sources (e.g., changes in incidence/prevalence, morbidity/mortality, health-related quality of life, disparities, or process indicators)
Timing and methods (e.g., pre/post comparison, qualitative/quantitative approaches)
Strategies to address potential challenges such as bias, confounding, feasibility, or ethical issues
How the evaluation findings would inform nursing practice, future interventions, policy, or positive social change
Additional Requirements (standard for this course):
Use APA 7th edition formatting (title page if submitting the full paper or section, level headings, citations, reference list).
Integrate epidemiologic concepts, course readings (e.g., Friis & Sellers), and scholarly sources throughout.
Support with evidence from prior sections of your paper and additional references as needed.
Submit by the due date specified in your course (typically Day 7 of Week 9; older documents reference a Friday deadline).
Note:
The exact page length, full rubric criteria, any requirement to submit only Section 5 versus the accumulating full paper, or instructor customizations are located in your Blackboard course under Week 9 > Assignments, along with the complete Major Assessment 7 Overview. Student documents consistently title this as “Assignment 4: Planning for Evaluation – Section 5 of Major Assessment 7” and emphasize selecting from the four stages of evaluation while linking back to your intervention and overall epidemiologic analysis.
This assignment often represents the near-final or final piece before any synthesis or full paper submission in later weeks (e.g., Week 11 in some versions).
There is typically a Week 9 Discussion focused on topics such as bias, confounding, information bias, selection bias, or data interpretation issues in epidemiologic studies (tying into evaluation rigor).
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
