Choose a quantitative original research study to complete your analysis (following the example provided) and create a quantitative instrument (with specific
This post has 2 assignments
Choose a quantitative original research study to complete your analysis (following the example provided) and create a quantitative instrument (with specific questions). See examples provided.
Just a few reminders…
– Use ONLY the mock topic from week 1 for all work in this course
– Embed all previous feedback in each new assignment
– Obtain a copy of the APA 7th edition manual to see examples of scholarly language and format
– Always check all the attachments and examples provided
Always make sure to provide your original empirical research rather than providing the review.
provide answer in separate documents for each assignment.
Assignment 1: summary of a quantitative research article
Overview: We will focus on writing a scholarly summary of a quantitative journal. More information about writing a summary can be found via the web resource “Writing Scholarly Abstracts.” Since the purpose of this summary is to summarize, there should not be any direct copying and pasting from the original article.
Directions: View the rubric to make sure you understand the expectations of this assignment. Create a 1-2 page (more is fine) single-spaced Analysis of Research summary published quantitative scholarly article related to your mock dissertation topic/research question from week 1. Additionally, this assignment functions just like assignment R.1 only it reviews a quantitative article instead of a qualitative one. Brevity and being concise are important as this analysis is intended to be a brief summation of the research.
Each summary must therefore consist of the following in this order:
- Bibliographic Citation – use the correctly formatted APA style citation for the work as the title of your abstract, displaying the full citation in bold font.
- Author Qualifications – name and qualification of each author conducting the research
- Research Concern – one paragraph summary of the reason for the overall research topic
- Research Purpose Statement AND Research Questions or Hypotheses – specific focus of the research
- Precedent Literature – key literature used in proposing the needed research (not the full bibliography or reference list)
- Research Methodology – description of the population, sample, and data gathering techniques used in the research
- Instrumentation – description of the tools used to gather data (surveys, tests, interviews, etc.)
- Findings – summation of what the research discovered and the types of analysis that were used to describe the findings (tables, figures, and statistical measures)
Assignment 2: Quantitative Data Collection Instrument:
Overview: Using the topic and research question you developed in week 1, you will design a quantitative instrument that could potentially answer your topic/research question if it were to be applied to a quantitative study. Keep in mind, this may take some stretching if you wrote your question leaning quantitatively. The purpose here is not to box you in but to ensure that you have a solid understanding of both methodologies. This assignment functions similar to 3.1 but in a quantitative format. Finally, view the rubric and examples to make sure you understand the expectations of this assignment.
Directions:
You will develop a word document to include:
- Your research question in the form of a quantitative question (if it was not already).
- An instrument or protocol (survey, questionnaire, archival data, etc) that could be used to answer the quantitative version of your research question.
*Special note for those using archival data, you will describe the process of data retrieval for your archival data.
- A one-paragraph description/justification of how your chosen instrument/protocol is the best choice for answering the quantitative version of your research question. This should include citations from the literature to support justification.
Additional links:
Types of quantitative research question | Lærd Dissertation
What is Quantitative Data? Types, Examples & Analysis | Fullstory
DSRT 837 Rubric (Adapted from Doctoral Research Handbook)
|
Criterion |
4 (Expert) |
3 (Proficient) |
2 (Fair) |
1 (Poor) |
|
I. Critical and reflective thinking capable of facilitating institutional, informational technology, or business related problem-solving or school/ college improvement |
Critically analyzed the topic. Discussion of the topic was extensive and anchored in fact and reason. Information about significant aspects of the topic were analyzed from the perspective of key related concepts. Meaning of the analysis was summarized. |
Critically analyzed the topic. Discussion of the topic was anchored in fact and reason. Information about significant aspects of the topic were analyzed from the perspective of key related concepts. Either the analysis or summary lacked some level of detail. |
Somewhat critically analyzed the topic. Discussion of the topic was minimally anchored in fact and reason. Information about significant aspects of the topic were somewhat analyzed from the perspective of key related concepts. Analysis and summary included but lacks a significant level of analysis and discussion. |
Minimally discussed the topic without supporting facts and reasons. Poor organization of the information and limited level of detail. |
|
II. Consideration for the impact of leadership, information technology, or business on institutional constituents. |
Demonstrates an extensive understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business. |
Demonstrates a good understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business. |
Demonstrates a fair understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business. |
Demonstrates a minimal understanding of the topic’s relationship to leadership, information technology, or business. |
|
III. Effective analytical and communication skills |
Demonstrates a professional level of skills associated with formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers. |
Demonstrates acceptable skills associated with formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers. |
Needs minor improvement in skills associated with formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers. |
Needs significant improvement in skills associated formatting, grammar, spelling, syntax, and use of numbers. |
|
IV. Knowledge of genres, paradigms, theories, literature or trends in business, criminal justice, education, English, health sciences, history, information technology, math, nursing, psychology, religion, or student personnel services. |
Subject is identified, realistic, and grounded in a recognized genre, paradigm, theory, literature, or trend. |
Subject is identified and is realistic, but it lacks grounding in a recognized genre, paradigm, theory, literature, or trend. |
Subject is identified but is not realistic or grounded in a recognized genre, paradigm, theory, literature, or trend. |
Subject area is not established. |
|
V. Required Components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions. |
All required parts of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions are included. |
Minor information is missing from the required components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions. |
Significant information is missing from the required components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions. |
The assignment lacks the detail needed to meet the requirements for the components of the assignment as listed in the assignment directions. |
,
DSRT 837 Rubric (Adapted from Docto
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
