My classmate did the data analysis section and I have to based on what she analysis to write a narrative report. I have screenshot and document for t
My classmate did the data analysis section and I have to based on what she analysis to write a narrative report. I have screenshot and document for the example on how to write the narrative report. My classmate also leaves a notes on that section about how she analysis the data.
Alcohol Use and Depression Risk
Elizabeth Keane, Joey Lam, Janna Nixon, Angela Schwab
Andrews University
FDNT 560-999
Dr. Jean Cadet
November 17, 2024
Objectives
Research question: Is increased alcohol use related to higher prevalence of depression?
Ho: Alcohol use does not have an effect on depression screening risk.
Ha: Alcohol use has an effect on depression screening risk.
1
Objectives
Research question: Is increased alcohol use related to higher prevalence of depression?
Ho: Alcohol use does not have an effect on depression screening risk.
Ha: Alcohol use has an effect on depression screening risk.
Background and Rationale
The World Health Organization (WHO, 2023) estimates that 3.8 percent of the global
population and 5 percent of adults have depression, which involves depressed mood or extended
periods where there is a loss of pleasure or interest in activities. According to results from the
2015–2020 National Survey on Drug Use and Health on U.S. individuals aged ≥12 years, 9.2
percent of Americans experienced depression in the year 2020, up from 7.3 percent in the year
2015. The highest prevalence of depression was among young adults aged 18-25 years at 17.2
percent, followed by adolescents aged 12-17 years at 16.9 percent (Goodwin et al., 2022).
Increasing rates of depression occur on a global scale as well, with an estimated 50 percent
increase in prevalence between 1990 and 2017 (Visontay et al., 2023). Evidence indicates that
depression is linked with diminished quality of life along with elevated risk for
non-communicable diseases and all-cause mortality (Machado et al., 2018). With the
burdensome impact of depression and the concerning trend of its increasing prevalence, there is a
need for more research on contributing and preventive factors in order to address depression in
public health.
Evidence also indicates that Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) is the most common
co-occuring disorder among individuals with major depressive disorder such that individuals
with AUD are 2.3 times more likely to have major depressive disorder in the last year (McHugh
& Weiss, 2019). Risky drinking is defined as “more than four standard drinks per day and 14
2
drinks total per week for men and more than three drinks per day and seven drinks in total per
week for women” (Nunes, 2023). A secondary analysis of the National Longitudinal Survey of
Youth 1979 cohort revealed surprising findings of a J-shape relationship between drinking levels
and risk of depression (Visontay et al., 2023). Light to moderate drinkers were found to have the
lowest risk for depression, while abstainers have a higher risk, and risky drinkers have the
highest risk for depression (Visontay et al, 2022). This J-shape relationship between depression
and AUD has been replicated in many studies, and is therefore the expected result in this analysis
of data collected by the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).
3
Methodology
a) Research Design
This study will adopt a mixed research approach to answer the above research questions.
While the first method will use the survey technique to measure the co-relations of major
variables, the second mechanism will employ semi-structured interviews to identify and
understand the existential arrangement of participants' lives. The use of statistical trends and the
personal accounts of other students makes the research results provide a broad perception of a
given topic.
b) Sample
As study participants, purposive sampling will be used to sample individuals. The study
will target 100 participants who meet the inclusion criteria: participants usually are people
between the ages of 18 and 50 who speak English and have backgrounds related to the research.
Patients with aphasia or other cognitive abnormalities that could make them incapable of giving
informed consent or otherwise unable to participate in the study entirely will be excluded. The
recruitment process will involve using social networks and enrollment in community-based
organizations. However, before participating in the study, participants will have to fill out the
pre-study survey to ensure they meet the inclusion criteria. So, while retaining the element of
chance and randomness that is needed in order to achieve a certain level of generalizability, a
combination of survey sampling (strict/no/accidental) and interview sampling (convenience) will
be utilized (ALQ_L, 2021).
c) Measurement/Instrumentation
4
The two main variables of concern are psychological health indexed by the dependent
variable and social determinants to which the independent variable belongs. Well-being data will
be collected using standard self-complete measures like the General Health Questionnaire
(GHQ-12) and an original demographic survey to elicit exposure information. The GHQ-12 is
proper based on the reliability and validity indices: Cronbach's alpha = 0.89. Quantitative data
will be collected through questionnaires, while questionnaire data will be quantitative because
they are structured and measure response strength (ALQ_L, 2021).
d) Detailed Study Procedures
Recruitment of participants will be done over a three-month timeline. As part of the
survey, participants will respond to questionnaires on the Internet, and interview participants will
meet the researcher face-to-face using secure video conferencing. The steps taken to protect the
participants' identity involve removing any identifiable information from the databases, storing
records electronically in safe locations, and shredding or erasing any identifiable information
after six months of the study. To ensure anonymity, participants will be assigned unique
identification numbers.
The timeline for participation includes:
● Week 1-4: Recruitment and screening.
● Week 5-8: Survey dissemination and response collection.
● Week 9-12: Conducting interviews and transcribing data.
All measures align with ethical standards, minimizing participant risks and maintaining
voluntary, informed consent.
5
e) Internal Validity
To reduce internal validity threats in the study, it will be possible to blind some of the
data analysts, and they were not to know the identity of the participants. Bias is controlled in the
following ways: The questions to be asked in the survey are pre-designed, and interview
procedures are uniform across surveyors. External validity concerns, like sample
representativeness, will be mitigated by subject recruitment from a wide area with further
diversification by geographic area and demographic characteristics.
f) Data Analysis
Data described in the quantitative form will be tabulated, and means, standard deviations
and other tests of significance will be used, as well as regression analysis. The analysis will be
done with the help of SPSS software. For qualitative data collection, interview data will be
analyzed using thematic analysis, where the interview data will be coded to develop themes or
patterns. Such a dual approach is used in order to enrich the study results with statistical and
narrative data at the same time.
6
Data Analysis
Descriptive Results
This is where Elizabeth’s descriptive analysis of the demographic data will go.
Inferential Results
Angela and Joey, I used the binary logistic test with the level of significance set at 0.05 (for
your reference, this is unit 7 in biostatistics; Dr. Kijai’s video on this topic is called “On binary
logistic regression analysis,” and it’s the fourth link from the top of the unit 7 Learning Hub
page). The binary logistic test is the appropriate choice for our data because the dependent
variable (depression risk) is categorical and binary (depressed or not). I re-defined depression as
depressed (1-3 in the codebook) or not depressed (0 in the codebook). I re-defined alcohol use as
non-drinker (0 in the codebook), light drinker (6-10 in the codebook), and moderate/heavy
drinker (1-5 in the codebook). Based on what’s in tables 1 and 2, Level of alcohol use is
non-drinker, Level of alcohol use (1) is light drinker, and Level of alcohol use (2) is
moderate/heavy drinker. Redefining the original alcohol and depression variables allowed me to
create new variables based on those categories, and I used those new variables (along with the
gender data) when I ran the binary logistic tests. The results show that not drinking alcohol and
being a moderate/heavy drinker ARE both significantly correlated with depression when we
don’t control for gender (table 2). However, when we do control for gender (table 3), the results
change: gender IS significantly correlated with depression, but alcohol use is NO LONGER
significantly correlated with depression. If I’m understanding this correctly, I think that means
that gender is a greater predictor of depression risk than alcohol use. I was unable to get SPSS to
7
show me each gender individually, even after trying a few different things; I can ask Dr. Cadet
about this after class on Monday. Please text me if you have any questions!
Table 1, Descriptive Statistics
Variables n M SD Skewness
Depressed or not 5518 .33 .47 .70
Gender 11933 1.53 .50 .02
Level of alcohol use 4917 1.20 .71 .04
Valid N (listwise) 4917
Table 2, Binary Logistic Regression Model without Gender
b SE Wald df p Exp(B)
Level of alcohol use 6.42 2 .04
Level of alcohol use(1)
.09 .09 1.07 1 .30 1.10
Level of alcohol use(2)
.17 .07 6.42 1 .01 1.18
Constant -.76 .0507 226.94 1 <.001 .47
Note: R2=0.002, p<.001
Table 3, Binary Logistic Regression Model with Gender
8
b SE Wald df p Exp(B)
Gender .30 .06 23.53 1 <.001 1.35
Level of alcohol use 3.01 2 .22
Level of alcohol use(1) .06 .09 .47 1 .50 1.06
Level of alcohol use(2) .12 .07 3.00 1 .08 1.12
Constant -1.19 .10 132.57 1 <.001 .30
Note: R2=0.008, p<.001
9
References
Ballester, L., Alayo, I., Vilagut, G., Almenara, J., Cebrià, A. I., Echeburúa, E., … &
UNIVERSAL Study Group. (2021). Validation of an online version of the alcohol use
disorders identification test (AUDIT) for alcohol screening in Spanish university
students. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(10),
5213. https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5213
Berner, D., & Amrhein, V. (2022). Why and how we should join the shift from significance
testing to estimation. Journal of evolutionary biology, 35(6), 777-787.
https://academic.oup.com/jeb/article-abstract/35/6/777/7317859
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, September). Alcohol Use (ALQ_L).
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey August 2021-August 2023
Questionnaire Data.
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2021-2022/ALQ_L.htm#SEQN
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024, September). Mental Health – Depression
Screener (DPQ_L). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
https://wwwn.cdc.gov/Nchs/Nhanes/2021-2022/DPQ_L.ht
Goodwin, R. D., Dierker, L. C., Wu, M., Galea, S., Hoven, C. W., & Weinberger, A. H. (2022).
Trends in U.S. Depression Prevalence From 2015 to 2020: The Widening Treatment Gap.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 63(5), 726–733.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2022.05.014
10
Machado, M. O., Veronese, N., Sanches, M., Stubbs, B., Koyanagi, A., Thompson, T., Tzoulaki,
I., Solmi, M., Vancampfort, D., Schuch, F. B., Maes, M., Fava, G. A., Ioannidis, J. P. A.,
& Carvalho, A. F. (2018). The association of depression and all-cause and cause-specific
mortality: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. BMC Medicine,
16(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-018-1101-z
McHugh, R. K., & Weiss, R. D. (2019). Alcohol Use Disorder and Depressive Disorders.
Alcohol research : current reviews, 40(1), arcr.v40.1.01.
https://doi.org/10.35946/arcr.v40.1.01
Nunes, E. V. (2023). Alcohol and the Etiology of Depression. American Journal of Psychiatry,
180(3), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.20230004
Visontay, R., Mewton, L., Slade, T., Aris, I. M., & Sunderland, M. (2023). Moderate Alcohol
Consumption and Depression: A Marginal Structural Model Approach Promoting
Causal Inference. American Journal of Psychiatry, 180(3), 209–217.
https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.22010043
Visontay, R., Sunderland, M., Slade, T. et al. (2022). Are there non-linear relationships between
alcohol consumption and long-term health?: a systematic review of observational studies
employing approaches to improve causal inference. BMC Med Res Methodol 22, 16.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01486-5
World Health Organization. (2023). Depressive disorder (depression). World Health
Organization; World Health Organization.
https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/depression
11
Appendix
Codebook
Variable/Label SPSS Variable Name
Variable Type
Code & Variable Description
Demographics
Gender of the participant.
RIAGENDR Dichotomous 1 = Male 2 = Female . = Missing
Age in years of the participant at the time of screening. Individuals 80 and over are top-coded at 80 years of age.
RIDAGEYR Continuous 0 to 79 = range of values 80 = 80 years of age and over . = Missing
Recode of reported race and Hispanic origin information, with Non-Hispanic Asian Category
RIDRETH3 Categorical 1 = Mexican American 2 = Other Hispanic 3 = Non-Hispanic White 4 = Non-Hispanic Black 6 = Non-Hispanic Asian 7 = Other Race – Including Multi-Racial . = Missing
What is the highest grade or level of school {you have/SP has} completed or the highest degree {you have/s/he has} received?
DMDEDUC2 Categorical 1 = Less than 9th grade 2 = 9-11th grade (Includes 12th grade with no diploma) 3 = High school graduate/GED or equivalent 4 = Some college or AA degree 5 = College graduate or above 7 = Refused 9 = Don’t know . = Missing
Study Variables
[Over the last 2 weeks, how often have you been
DPQ020 Categorical 0 = Not at all 1 = Several days 2 = More than half the days 3 = Nearly every day
12
bothered by the following problems:] feeling down, depressed, or hopeless?
During the past 12 months, about how often did you drink any type of alcoholic beverage? PROBE: In other words, how many days per week, per month, or per year did you drink?
ALQ121 Categorical 0 = Never in the last year 1= Every day 2= Nearly every day 3 = 3 to 4 times a week 4 = 2 times a week 5 = Once a week 6 = 2 to 3 times a month 7 = Once a month 8 = 7 to 11 times in the last year 9 = 3 to 6 times in the last year 10= 1 to 2 times in the last year
,
Example of Binary Logistic Regression in SPSS with one independent and one dependent variable
Research Question
Our research question is: to what extent does political party affiliation predict the respondents’ having gun in home
Hypotheses
Null Hypothesis (H0): There is no statistically significant relationship between political party affiliation and having gun in home?
Alternative Hypothesis (HA): There is statistically significant relationship between political party affiliation and having gun in home?
Variables
Independent Variables (IV):
partyid — political party affiliation, measured as categorical, where 0 = Strong Democrat, 1 = Not Strong Democrat, 2 = Independent Near Democrat, 3 = Independent, 4 = Independent Near Republican, 5 = Not Strong Republican’ 6 = Strong Republican, and 7 = Other Party.
Dependent Variables (DV):
Owngun — have gun in home, where 1 = Yes; 2 = No. Prior to conducting the analysis, the variable “owngun” was recoded as 0 = No and 1 = Yes.
Results
The average age of participants is 49.37 ( SD = 19.143) (Table 1).
Table 1
Descriptives Statistics for Age of Respondents
Statistic |
Std. Error |
|||
AGE OF RESPONDENT |
Mean |
49.37 |
.662 |
|
95% Confidence Interval for Mean |
Lower Bound |
48.07 |
||
Upper Bound |
50.67 |
|||
5% Trimmed Mean |
49.03 |
|||
Median |
49.00 |
|||
Variance |
293.879 |
|||
Std. Deviation |
17.143 |
|||
Minimum |
18 |
|||
Maximum |
89 |
|||
Range |
71 |
|||
Interquartile Range |
27 |
|||
Skewness |
.226 |
.094 |
||
Kurtosis |
-.781 |
.188 |
Regression results
At the model level, the results showed the Nagelkerke R square to be .111, which means that 11.1% of the variability in having gun in home is explained by political party affiliation (See Table 2). The analysis showed that political party affiliation was significantly associated with having gun in home ꭕ2(7) = 36.010, p < .001 (See Table 3).
Table 2
Model Summary
Step |
-2 Log likelihood |
Cox & Snell R Square |
Nagelkerke R Square |
1 |
501.181a |
.077 |
.111 |
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001. |
Table 3
Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients
Chi-square |
df |
Sig. |
||
Step 1 |
Step |
36.010 |
7 |
.000 |
Block |
36.010 Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers. Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper? Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials. We write plagiarism Free Content Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties. Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions. All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions |