Entire first draft of review of article, including:

Entire first draft of review of article, including:

    • Title page with Abstract
      • Asbtract should be 250-300 words, single spaced
      • Include the word count of the abstract and body of the paper on the title page
      • Use the format in the model papers.
    • Body:
      • 1200-1250 words, double spaced
      • Use these headings: Introduction, Narrative, Conclusion, References
    • 8 supporting references listed on separate References page should be APA format, double spaced, and cited in the text.
      • Supporting articles must not be older than 10 years, unless you can justify why the particular older source must be used.
    • Page numbers in the upper right corner

Submit to Canvas before the due date and time.

    • Use this format for naming your paper before uploading:
      FirstName-LastName-[Assignment Name and Draft]-[Quarter and year].docx
      i.e. Peter-Anteater-ROAFinalDraft-Fall2021.docx

Rubric for the ROA First Draft

For instructions on the form and content of the paper, do not use the rubric! Use the lecture slides and ROA Resources page. The rubric just provides brief descriptions of the point deductions.Review of Article – First Draft (NEW)

Review of Article – First Draft (NEW)
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReference Use and Listing-4: no citations or reference page |
-3: no reference page |
-2: no in-text citations |
-1: incorrect APA formatting |
-1: mismatch between reference list and citations |
up to -2: fewer than 8 references cited in text and/or in reference list
4 pts

Full Marks

 3 pts

-1

Incorrect APA format OR mismatch between reference list and citations OR fewer than 8 references cited in text OR fewer than 8 scholarly references in reference list

 2 pts

-2

Some combination of two of the following: Incorrect APA format OR mismatch between reference list and citations OR fewer than 8 references cited in text OR fewer than 8 scholarly references in reference list

 1 pts

-3

No reference page OR No in-text citations

 0 pts

No Marks

No citations or references at all

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAbstract and Title Page-4: No title page or abstract at all |
-3: No abstract |
-2: <200 or >350 words in abstract |
-1: Formatting problems, such as missing word counts
4 pts

Full Marks

Great work – keep it up!

 3 pts

-1

<200 words or >350 words in abstract OR Major formatting problems, such as missing word counts OR No title page

 2 pts

-2

Combination of two of the following: <200 words or >350 words in abstract OR Major formatting problems, such as missing word counts OR No title page

 1 pts

-3

No abstract or combination of three of the following: <200 words or >350 words in abstract OR Major formatting problems, such as missing word counts OR No title page

 0 pts

No marks

No title page or abstract at all

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction and Conclusion-3: Missing introduction | -1: Missing conclusion | up to -4: Thesis needs to be clearer, contextualization needs more (or less) detail, conclusion is vague or goes too far.
4 pts

Full Marks

Great work – keep it up!

 3 pts

-1

Thesis or conclusion is vague or unsupported OR Midding conclusion

 2 pts

-2

Thesis needs to be clearer or contextualization needs more (or less) detail or conclusion is vague or goes too far.

 1 pts

-3

Major problems with thesis, contextualization, or conclusion. OR Missing introduction

 0 pts

No Marks

No introduction or conclusion.

4 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeNarrative-3: <1200 words in body or >1250 words in body | -5: <900 words in body or >1500 words in body | up to -7: Problems with topic sentences, clear support, paragraph structure, and/or argument.
8 pts

Full Marks

Great work – keep it up!

 7 pts

-1

Overall very good work, but there may be a weak topic sentence or a paragraph that needs more support.

 6 pts

-2

Overall good work, but there may be weak topic sentences or paragraphs that needs more support.

 5 pts

-3

A good start, but paragraphs need more support and/or need to be better and more clearly structured. OR <1200 words in body or >1250 words in body

 4 pts

-4

Paragraphs need much more support and/or to be restructured.

 3 pts

-5

Major problems with evidence, support, and/or argument OR <900 words in body or >1500 words in body

 2 pts

-6

Major problems with evidence, support, and/or argument, possibly misunderstands the assignment.

 1 pts

-7

Major misunderstanding the assignment or very little is written.

 0 pts

No Marks

The Narrative section is missing.

8 pts

Total Points: 20

PreviousNext

Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers

Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.

Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS

Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?

Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.

We write plagiarism Free Content

Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.

Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.

Related Posts

All Rights Reserved Terms and Conditions
College pals.com Privacy Policy 2010-2018