By end of day on Wednesday, submit: Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience
By end of day on Wednesday, submit:
Final revised version of Part 1: Argument to your Opposing Audience
Final revised version of Part 2: Argument to your Like-Minded Audience
Self-Analysis Contrast Essay.
To Submit:
Download all your work from Google Docs into a PDF.
Note: only PDFs will be accepted.
When you click START ASSIGNMENT, choose Browse My Computer
Attach ALL THREE documents by clicking ADD ANOTHER FILE
Only submit when all 3 parts are attached as PDFs.
Please try NOT to submit a second or third attempt. It overwrites e9xisting submitted work and then I can’t find them.
Rubric
Module 2 Grading
Module 2 Grading
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting/DesignGenre Appropriate, real world formatting
Appealing to the eye for medium of publication (print, digital, etc)
Hyperlinks/use of evidence is smooth and effective for genre
20 to >19.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond.
19 to >16.0 pts
Strong
Good choices.
16 to >15.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
15 to >13.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution.
13 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 1: Writing to the OppositionDirectly Address opposition’s view. Critique their position. Make your own claim, creating a rebuttal or refutation. End with goodwill. Use evidence effectively.
40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond .
36 to >34.0 pts
Strong
Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.
34 to >30.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
30 to >28.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution
28 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 2: Writing to the Like-Minded AudienceBuild a relationship with Your audience. Give reasons for further action. Give clear next steps/goals for moving forward. Effectively use evidence to inspire.
40 to >36.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond .
36 to >34.0 pts
Strong
Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.
34 to >30.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
30 to >28.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution
28 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePart 3: Self-AnalysisIdentify and explain each audience group (do more than identify them. Explain their values, biases, and expectations). Analyze WHY you had to make different choices based on your knowledge of the target audiences
Contrast how your knowledge/awareness of the DIFFERENCES in target audiences’ identity, values, biases, and expectations to explain WHY the techniques had to be different.
Analyze HOW the techniques affected each audience differently, but still supported your overall position on the topic.
80 to >72.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Goes above and beyond .
72 to >68.0 pts
Strong
Meets assignment goals effectively, though possibly without finesse, style, or insights.
68 to >60.0 pts
Effective
Mostly meets the assignment goals but may be weak or underdeveloped.
60 to >56.0 pts
Developing
Attempts to meet assignment goals but has a variety of weaknesses or problems in execution
56 to >0 pts
No Marks
Totally missing or clearly misunderstanding the assignment.
80 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClarity and Analytical LanguageClearly edited for grammar, verb tenses, sentence structure, spelling, and other proofreading skills. Language is clear and easy to read and appropriate for the context/community.
20 to >19.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
Style and flair.
19 to >16.0 pts
Strong
Clear and concise.
16 to >15.0 pts
Effective
Mostly clear but a few consistent problems.
15 to >13.0 pts
Developing
Lots of grammar/editing errors showing widespread weaknesses in proofreading.
13 to >0 pts
No Marks
Not in English.
20 pts
Total Points: 200
Collepals.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we'll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Get ZERO PLAGIARISM, HUMAN WRITTEN ESSAYS
Why Hire Collepals.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.